Big 12 Expansion

2clones4cy

Active Member
Dec 2, 2012
171
41
28
37
So with the Blow to Baylor and qb Seth Russell I am going to assume they will finish the season with 1-2 losses. I don't see how any of the Big 12's powers will finish undefeated as I see the top teams all with at least 1 loss. Lets say the selection committee leaves us out again this year. Will we finally see an Expansion?? I just cant think of anyway we get into the Playoff with one of our teams that still have a chance (TCU, Baylor, Okie St, Oklahoma) losing this late in the year.

If we don't expand if the scenario above happens I can see the Big 12 not being around much longer. I know we signed the TV contracts but it would benefit all the powers of our conference by splitting up teams so the big boys don't have to meet every team year in and year out plus ISU would be decent the non years they don't have to play all 5 powers like the Mcarney era.
 

3GenClone

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2009
6,423
4,067
113
Des Moines
Probably no to conference expansion because the PAC 12 just lost a bid too. I think 8 team playoff expansion is more likely.
 

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 6, 2010
5,577
2,395
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
There are a lot of things this year that could make a playoff decision very difficult.

What happens if there are like 9 one loss teams?

Wouldn't want to be the people who make those decisions...
 

TXCyclones

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 13, 2011
11,191
12,196
113
TX
And it's not like the ACC is looking to fill a slot. So now you've got 3 of the P5 showing issues.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,246
13,706
113
Iowa
I doubt we'll see more than 1-2 teams undefeated when push comes to shove. Clemson might get in just by default.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
54,479
63,187
113
Ankeny
Probably no to conference expansion because the PAC 12 just lost a bid too. I think 8 team playoff expansion is more likely.

If notre dame ran the table and got a bid, keeping a second p5 conference out, i think that might speed up the expansion to 8 that needs to happen.
 

isukendall

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
2,446
581
113
Fort Collins, CO
If notre dame ran the table and got a bid, keeping a second p5 conference out, i think that might speed up the expansion to 8 that needs to happen.

This may be the only thing that makes me cheer for Notre Dame, ever.

Once they make the playoff, I hope they fall flat on their faces.
 

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
I saw two ESPN commentators making playoff predictions today (one was Brett McMurphy). One had the Pac-12 left out and the other had the SEC left out.

If Clemson loses, this decision appears to get a lot easier. If not, I think a one-loss TCU, Baylor, or Oklahoma gets in over a one-loss Pac-12 team and they'll be out this year.
 

CyJack13

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2010
12,666
1,665
113
Eight team playoff, nine conference games for all P5 conferences, no more P5-FCS matchups, penalize teams for playing low ranked OOC opponents, and favor quality wins over undefeated or one loss teams that played weak schedules. That's where college football needs to get to.
 

laminak

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2010
6,495
9,828
113
Marion
I saw two ESPN commentators making playoff predictions today (one was Brett McMurphy). One had the Pac-12 left out and the other had the SEC left out.

If Clemson loses, this decision appears to get a lot easier. If not, I think a one-loss TCU, Baylor, or Oklahoma gets in over a one-loss Pac-12 team and they'll be out this year.

I would love to see the SEC left out. I doubt the selection committee will do it, though.
 

erikbj

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2006
7,506
649
113
45
hiawatha, ia
I love the current final 4 setup NYE and 10 days later.

They just need to figure out, 4 conferences. The (8) division winners play at the end of November (round 1). Then the final 4 like now.
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
23,878
26,307
113
Behind you
Eight team playoff, nine conference games for all P5 conferences, no more P5-FCS matchups, penalize teams for playing low ranked OOC opponents, and favor quality wins over undefeated or one loss teams that played weak schedules. That's where college football needs to get to.

This x 10,000.
 

AustinHawk

Member
Dec 10, 2009
174
0
16
Eight team playoff, nine conference games for all P5 conferences, no more P5-FCS matchups, penalize teams for playing low ranked OOC opponents, and favor quality wins over undefeated or one loss teams that played weak schedules. That's where college football needs to get to.

This is logical and makes too much sense. Are you not familiar with the way the NCAA works?
 

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 4, 2007
13,786
20,454
113
Minneapolis
And it's not like the ACC is looking to fill a slot. So now you've got 3 of the P5 showing issues.

Uhhh, what? Clemson, at this point, is right there. They could falter like they always do, but to say there isn't an ACC team in the mix is wrong.
 

fsanford

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 22, 2007
6,703
4,815
113
Los Angeles
Probably no to conference expansion because the PAC 12 just lost a bid too. I think 8 team playoff expansion is more likely.

Stanford runs the table they get in.

Either Bama or LSU gets in.
1 of Ohio State or Michigan State, or Iowa
Clemson

Stanford gets 1 more game, if they beat a Utah, UCLA or ASU, they will get the nod.