This movie looks pretty intense. A24 has been knocking em out of the park, so solid chance this is a good movie. Fascinated to see how California and Texas become allies against the US government.
This movie looks pretty intense. A24 has been knocking em out of the park, so solid chance this is a good movie. Fascinated to see how California and Texas become allies against the US government.
Like Snakes on a PlaneI love movies like this that could possibly become reality
Fascinated to see how California and Texas become allies against the US government.
I'm sure thats done very purposefully to suggest it's a work of fiction and the conflict is not going to be based on current real world political divides.Texas working with California? LMAO.
I'm sure thats done very purposefully to suggest it's a work of fiction and the conflict is not going to be based on current real world political divides.
This movie looks pretty intense. A24 has been knocking em out of the park, so solid chance this is a good movie. Fascinated to see how California and Texas become allies against the US government.
Thinking that either side would easily win if we had a civil war is a take I definitely disagree with.The "Civil War" as we learned in history class wasn't really a civil war (small c small w). It was more a regular war where we temporarily broke into two countries and had what amounted to a regular war for the middle of the 1800s, though certain theaters of the conflict (especially Missouri and other parts of the West) had more the "neighbor against neighbor" bushwhacking tenor of an actual civil war.
It wouldn't be States XYZ teaming up against States PDQ. It would be more rural areas against urban areas, the real divide in our politics... which would be much messier and the rural areas would easily win.
Thinking that either side would easily win if we had a civil war is a take I definitely disagree with.
I think the only real world scenario of any kind of war in the US is if there is some kind of cataclysmic event that results in the breakdown of society and a scarcity of resources. The average American is way too comfortable to actually go and fight it out in any sort of real way over politics, even as divided as we are over that currently.The "Civil War" as we learned in history class wasn't really a civil war (small c small w). It was more a regular war where we temporarily broke into two countries and had what amounted to a regular war for the middle of the 1800s, though certain theaters of the conflict (especially Missouri and other parts of the West) had more the "neighbor against neighbor" bushwhacking tenor of an actual civil war.
It wouldn't be States XYZ teaming up against States PDQ. It would be more rural areas against urban areas, the real divide in our politics... which would be much messier and the rural areas would easily win.
I think a civiI war today would be various acts of terror and sabotage. Some committed by lone wolves. Some by more organized groups on a larger scale. Mixed in with larger insurrections like January 6.Thinking that either side would easily win if we had a civil war is a take I definitely disagree with.
I think the only real world scenario of any kind of war in the US is if there is some kind of cataclysmic event that results in the breakdown of society and a scarcity of resources. The average American is way too comfortable to actually go and fight it out in any sort of real way over politics, even as divided as we are over that currently.
The "Civil War" as we learned in history class wasn't really a civil war (small c small w). It was more a regular war where we temporarily broke into two countries and had what amounted to a regular war for the middle of the 1800s, though certain theaters of the conflict (especially Missouri and other parts of the West) had more the "neighbor against neighbor" bushwhacking tenor of an actual civil war.
It wouldn't be States XYZ teaming up against States PDQ. It would be more rural areas against urban areas, the real divide in our politics... which would be much messier and the rural areas would easily win.
Texas working with California? LMAO.