spot on. many boards have lots of "experience" and don't recruit the right people to take over for them. they want their ways to continue forever (often not realizing or accepting that things change) and if it was good enough 10 years ago or 2 years ago why change? i face this situation on a monthly basis with boards i am on. the best ones don't always get friends to be the new board members but people who add the right value. if the D2D board is full of runners it will fail if no one looks at the details and becomes the "heretic" to bring up potential problems. If the whole board is detailed finance guys they'll be bad at marketing. for volunteer boards it's not "who you know" but rather "what THEY know".I don't personally know but I read elsewhere that one problem they've had is the older people have squashed ideas from others and that now they don't have younger people to takeover and keep it going. Just judging by the people I saw at the press conference I can easily see that being the case.
It would be better to charge a few more dollars for professional manager that will keep the name and spirit of the event. Otherwise they will completely cede the day and route to a for profit organizer.
Seems as though their thing has always been cheap entry fees/no corporate sponsors, and they want to keep it that way.
The name Dam to Dam will be done, but the race will surely continue under a new name/sponsors.
I think it is on the lower scale, especially considering the popularity that it has.Being a non runner and not a DSM person how does their entry fee compare to others of similar scale, offerings etc. It seems to me a lot of the draw was the "dam to dam" aspect. My fear is that they are giving up one of the biggest positive aspects of the event just because they didn't want to raise the entry fee $10.
I looked it up last night and was kind of surprised how high it was. Perhaps it's comparable to other races in the area, but I've run the Bolder Boulder multiple times and the price was within $10-15 of that race. The Bolder Boulder is often considered the gold standard for road races under the half marathon length. 55k+ runners running in a city roughly half the size of Des Moines.Being a non runner and not a DSM person how does their entry fee compare to others of similar scale, offerings etc. It seems to me a lot of the draw was the "dam to dam" aspect. My fear is that they are giving up one of the biggest positive aspects of the event just because they didn't want to raise the entry fee $10.
That sounds horribleI looked it up last night and was kind of surprised how high it was. Perhaps it's comparable to other races in the area, but I've run the Bolder Boulder multiple times and the price was within $10-15 of that race. The Bolder Boulder is often considered the gold standard for road races under the half marathon length. 55k+ runners running in a city roughly half the size of Des Moines.
The release I read really made it sound like they were just mailing it in. There are plenty of races, and larger races, which are run successfully with volunteers. If lack of volunteers is their reason, it makes me think they didn't try real hard to find any. Every single high school in the area offers graduation honors for volunteer hours. That's thousands of potential volunteers just in this area. So their excuse of "not enough volunteers" sounds pretty weak IMO.
getting people to volunteer on race day is not the problem. those people commit to one day of work for a good event. the problem is finding volunteers to RUN the event, discuss it's details, line up all those one-day volunteers, get permits, get insurance, organize the party festivities, etc. Those are run by the volunteer board of directors that is having trouble finding people. again, it's not getting people to hand out water or shuttle people the day of race - it's getting people to be the board of directors.
You are telling me they can't find someone to do that even as a part time job? Weak excuse IMO. I don't know if they do but from my math if they sold out of all spots they would have $430,000 in revenue plus sponsorship money.
I looked it up last night and was kind of surprised how high it was. Perhaps it's comparable to other races in the area, but I've run the Bolder Boulder multiple times and the price was within $10-15 of that race. The Bolder Boulder is often considered the gold standard for road races under the half marathon length. 55k+ runners running in a city roughly half the size of Des Moines.
As someone who has planned large events (not a race, but week long conservation projects), they have a way of consuming your life. It's not a "once in a while" thing, it's a "do something every day, put out fires" thing. It's constantly on your mind and can be incredibly stressful.getting people to volunteer on race day is not the problem. those people commit to one day of work for a good event. the problem is finding volunteers to RUN the event, discuss it's details, line up all those one-day volunteers, get permits, get insurance, organize the party festivities, etc. Those are run by the volunteer board of directors that is having trouble finding people. again, it's not getting people to hand out water or shuttle people the day of race - it's getting people to be the board of directors.
You are telling me they can't find someone to do that even as a part time job? Weak excuse IMO. I don't know if they do but from my math if they sold out of all spots they would have $430,000 in revenue plus sponsorship money.
As someone who has planned large events (not a race, but week long conservation projects), they have a way of consuming your life. It's not a "once in a while" thing, it's a "do something every day, put out fires" thing. It's constantly on your mind and can be incredibly stressful.