ESPN Insider, Why you should (or shouldn't trust) every top 25 team?

[mcdrier]

Anyone who has a subscription to ESPN Insider, could they be willing to summarize what they say about ISU?

I would assume they are not trusting ISU b/c they have lapses on defense and lack of depth?

I would be interested in what they say about Iowa, but I know F*ck Iowa. But someone could make a quick mention.

 

[SplitIdentity]

Poaching paid info. Nice.

 

[Hoiball92]

Poaching paid info. Nice.

Espn insiders is a waste of money

 

[SplitIdentity]

Espn insiders is a waste of money

100% agree.

 

[carvers4math]

For Iowa, they said **** Iowa.

 

[ISUTKD]

Basically they said what we already know...

George and Monte are great. We lack depth, but have lots of seniors. Jameel has to to have his head in the game if we are to have a chance of going deep in the tourney.

About Iowa, they said Uthoff is great and the guards aren't. No mention regarding the eye poking T-Rex that plays center.

 

[isu_oak]

Espn insiders is a waste of money

I think it's worth $5 a year. I'll spend more than that in the beers I drink watching the game tonight.

 

[SplitIdentity]

I think it's worth $5 a year. I'll spend more than that in the beers I drink watching the game tonight.

Beer snob.

 

[CYdTracked]

Espn insiders is a waste of money

If it wasn't worth the minimal costs to have it there wouldn't always been people asking for the info. You get ESPN The Mag with the subscription too which some might like, me personally mine usually goes in the recycling bin without reading most weeks but I do read a lot of insider articles that makes it worth it to me.

 

[CoKane]

Might sign up just to see what the reason to trust this team was.

 

[madguy30]

Might sign up just to see what the reason to trust this team was.

Seniors?

They did this same **** last year, so that's stretching for a reason.

 

[SoapyCy]

Poaching paid info. Nice.

You mean an opinion?

Ever told.someone what happens on.a cable show? Same thing.