Feds could tax UT and NE and hand the money over to the little schools as redistribution.:smile:How does this help ISU? Getting back at schools after they already left doesn't do **** for us.
Feds could tax UT and NE and hand the money over to the little schools as redistribution.:smile:How does this help ISU? Getting back at schools after they already left doesn't do **** for us.
Chuck was just voted hardest working senator by thehill.com. Good to have a guy like that go to work for you.
This...lots of money involved and EVERYONE is looking to profit from it.
How does this help ISU? Getting back at schools after they already left doesn't do **** for us.
Yeah Chuck! He mows his own lawn.
All this conference re-alignment is strictly based on money. I think it's fair game to question their tax status with the type of dollars likely involved with these decisions. But 1 thing I hate hearing is these politicians thinking they have any leverage at all to affect what schools wind up doing. It's all political positioning by them, they have no power or leverage to keep the Big 12 from breaking up or a certain school changing conferences. Anyone who believes that they do are morons that just bought into the political tactic they used to get your attention and support.
Matt and Chris -- I know you are both professionals and will do a great job of putting together questions for Senator Grassley if he's able to be on your show.
However, two suggested questions are:
(1) Is it possible to go to Federal Court and suspend the process of conferences expanding in order to explore possible violations of anti-trust laws?; and
(2) Obviously you realize what a large impact conference re-alignment will have on Iowa State University and our state's overall economy. Tens of millions of dollars are at stake over the next decade alone. What do you feel are within your powers to effectively influence the process for a positive outcome for Iowa State University?
Hate to say it, cause I love Chuck. Quality person, quality family.
But I'll believe it when I see it.
I agree with your point Matt that the number one obstacle for congressional action is the speed with which this all is apparently going to happen. Second is the fact that other representative won't hurt their players in the super conferences.
He must be an Iowa grad. I normally hire Iowa grads to mow my yard--that is when they aren't delivering pizza.:biglaugh:
I do love the differences in peoples reaction. Culver gets scrutinized while Chuck gets cheered on...
lol. good point. I don't think it's a coincidence that both are up for re-election this year. If Harkin was up he'd be doing the same thing.
Yep, my opinion is no matter what political affiliation a politician may have and they are trying to help our cause then Ill support them, not scrutinize them for trying to help....
but i guess thats too difficult of a concept for some to understand here.
Yep, my opinion is no matter what political affiliation a politician may have and they are trying to help our cause then Ill support them, not scrutinize them for trying to help....
but i guess thats too difficult of a concept for some to understand here.