Great question. The disparity is just so great that what they can spend on a project or yet fully developed player with big possible upside dwarfs what we can spend on our most critical starters.
Example would be Tampa. He’s already getting looks that would probably offer him 150k to 300k for a single season of eligibility. We would probably max out on him at 20k to 25k. If it was a QB or RB, we could possibly stretch up to 50k but then not have anything for 2-3 other big pieces.
The collective will help but it’s probably going to max out at under 100k per year. Maybe it gets higher, but it’s got a long ways to go still - much will depend on some of its new financial offering program and incentives. Outside of the collective, we may pull together roughly 200k to 400k (on a really good year).
When you see other schools spending that on 1 or 2 players and it’s our total budget for all sports, that’s where it really comes into focus. I’d say the top 6-7 programs in the Big 12 will have no less than 3mil per year and on up to 5-8mil at places like OSU, Baylor, etc.
And unfortunately, I don’t see that decreasing. Big donors have always given big dollars with very little ROI. Now they’ll be able to target a specific set of players and actually feel like they get a return.
I could also see a big focus on transfers where they can use the ISUs to develop players and then snatch them for years 3-4.