Actually, ISU charging the $90 a ticket favors the U of Iowa
Call Iowa afraid, call them anything but the $90 thing and the mandatory season tix deal have ruffled some feathers big time.
I am an I-club member and at an August event this very topic came up..I saw some big donors voicing their opinion on this series...if they have any pull things don't look good. Just about every Iowa Fan that I know does not want to play ISU anymore.
As an Iowa Fan I personally see our rivalry with Minny a much bigger deal...But of course It might be because I don't hate ISU like many Iowa fans do..
this rivalry is in jeaporday...Many people thing that there is a State Law that requires the series....that is simply untrue.
The current contract favors Iowa State, if only because Iowa has almost 15,000 more seats at Kinnick Stadium. Following the 2004 game, Iowa State took home $583,935. After last year's game, Iowa paid Iowa State $593,103. Both of those games were played in Iowa City.
ISU paid Iowa $386,914.17 after the 2005 game in Ames.
I'm sorry, but Iowa fans .... They don't have to go to the game if it is so objectionable.
.
This part I love:
How can this favor ISU??? What did the UofI take from the IC game in 2004 versus what ISU took in the 2003 game? Because the 20% payout is higher, it also means the 80% take is higher.... geezzz... what kind of math are we using??!!:wideeyed:
-keep.
THe point is Many including some big boosters ARE finding it objectionable...and instead of following your advice about not going to the game they are taking it a step further by wanting the series cancelled.
Barta has been very close to the vest on the contractual issues...there has been considerable buzz about the Tickets around this years game and the unfairness of the current contract...this has fanned the flames by Iowa fans to start barking about ending the series. It is nothing new..Iowa fans have been talking for quite awhile about changing the series or outright ending it.
I have heard ISU fans mention the same thing.
This part I love:
How can this favor ISU??? What did the UofI take from the IC game in 2004 versus what ISU took in the 2003 game? Because the 20% payout is higher, it also means the 80% take is higher.... geezzz... what kind of math are we using??!!:wideeyed:
-keep.
Gee I thought the argument was equity in what the visiting team gets. Its not Iowa's fault that ISU has a smaller stadium. You are making it sound like the only way Iowa fills a stadium is when ISU comes to town..