Greene is very good and probably is the best player in the Big 10. Now, the real question is how much credit best guy in a very bad conference get? And the Big 10 is very bad. IL lost to a MAC team, WI should have lost to Cal-Poly! Heck Iowa was is real trouble at home against a horrible ISU team.
I know the national media just loves to try and figure out a way to have a Big 10 team in the BCS games, but every time the Big guns in the Big 11 have a chance to do something they fall on their faces. Ohio state was murdered by USC. Penn State was completely outclassed by Iowa. Without all the turnovers that game would not have been close.
Greene is very good and he would be at least good even behind the ISU line. I hope he gets all the awards he deserves, because he has really done a lot in a short period of time. Heisman is out of reach this year and I just don't think a guy that like school all that much is going to stay at Iowa another year when he is getting lots of looks from the pros.
1. The Big 10 has 1 auto-bid, didn't you know? There is no "figuring it out."
2. Iowa won that game by 1 point, it's hard to say that Iowa outclassed Penn State. The Hawks made the plays they had to make when they had to make them.
It's funny to read Cyclone fans trying to downplay the recognition that Greene is getting. Saying things like he only got all those yards because of his o-line, and even then only because he played in the Big 10, the Big 10 sucks, etc. The guy ran for 100 yards in every single game this year. More often than not, he was the best player on the field in every game. He didn't go to spring practice, didn't play last year, and his only goal going into this season was to make the team.
Why do you people feel the need to qualify everything the young man has accomplished? Why can't you look at his body of work and appreciate it for what it is? Or is that too hard?