It is kind of surprising to me as well. ISU has only had women's soccer as a conference sport for 18 years. Again, if this coach lost her job for performance, is there a reason to expect ISU to be better in women's soccer, or is this a general reflection of the AD's expectation for all sports? Should it be "easy" to be a top-tier Big 12 women's soccer team? It's an honest question.
Yes - the Big 12 is an incredibly weak soccer conference. The conference has
never (including before the Big 12) had a College Cup (final four) participant, including A&M, Missouri, Nebraska, and Colorado.
NCAA Division I Women's Soccer Championship - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why do you reward a coach who in 6 years averages 1 win per season in the conference? The standard in the Big 12 is to at least make the conference tourney, and Dillinger only did it this year. Throw in she was 0-6 against Iowa (they are 13-5-1 this year), often getting blown out, and only beat two ranked teams in six years. You don't dump the kind of money into a non-revenue sport to have it be the habitual whipping boy of the conference like we have in soccer and softball.
As Tornado Man says and I agree, the softball coach needs to be on watch, because they have been terrible for years, and when your in-state rival has had a winning program for years, you can't use the weather as an excuse as to why you can't get talent, which is the same for soccer.
It also wouldn't surprise if a couple of others aren't on the hot seat.