agree. The kid should have communicated he is going through something and tried to talk to the staff about it instead of disappearing (if in fact that is what happened). I'm sure if he would have done that, the staff would have tried to find some resources to help him out. But it is Ole Miss, I don't feel bad if negative repercussions come their way. This program has been cheating for decades. When they have been caught, it doesn't really matter, they pay whatever little hand slap price for the violations and just go back to cheating again. And why not? It is helped them win a lot. Now, of course in the age of NIL it is different, but back before NIL, they were paying players like crazy.Quite frankly, I don’t disagree with Kiffin here. He does have a right to kick him off the team. They just can’t pull his scholarship as a result.
Lane Kiffin has been a ginormous preening d*uchebag ever since he became a public figure with his first head coaching job at Tennessee. This episode probably won't cost him his current job, sorry to say, but it does validate why I have always had nothing but contempt for him.
I think he actually says not showing up to work. I don't think this is the legal gotcha some seem to want it to be. One can perform work or even show up to a place to work without legally being an employee.Kiffin yelled at the kid for "not showing up for work". He's gonna regret that comment as his players are not employees.
You're right, but I don't think "for" or "to" make much difference. The operative word he used was "work" and I'm guessing the player's lawyer will latch onto that.I think he actually says not showing up to work. I don't think this is the legal gotcha some seem to want it to be. One can perform work or even show up to a place to work without legally being an employee.
So when a teacher says you need to do better work on your test, it means that junior high and high school kids are now employees of their school?You're right, but I don't think "for" or "to" make much difference. The operative word he used was "work" and I'm guessing the player's lawyer will latch onto that.
While I think the coach was probably within his rights to dismiss a player from the team for going AWOL for 2 weeks, if that player was suffering from documented mental health issues at the time, the university will probably end up having to pay a settlement.
I wouldn't be surprised if the university administration ends up telling Kiffin he needs to reinstate the player.
You're right, but I don't think "for" or "to" make much difference. The operative word he used was "work" and I'm guessing the player's lawyer will latch onto that.
While I think the coach was probably within his rights to dismiss a player from the team for going AWOL for 2 weeks, if that player was suffering from documented mental health issues at the time, the university will probably end up having to pay a settlement.
I wouldn't be surprised if the university administration ends up telling Kiffin he needs to reinstate the player.