Any athletic 3 or 4 in today's NBA could guard Bird.I hate the 'if he played in another era' argument but, if Bird had the offensive freedom that today's shooters are allowed, he would be Steph Curry today. But more accurate and more well-rounded.
You serious Clark?Any athletic 3 or 4 in today's NBA could guard Bird.
Any athletic 3 or 4 in today's NBA could guard Bird.
Bird may have made some crazy shots. But he missed plenty too. His FG% for his career was 49.6% which would rank him 107th this season in the NBA. His 3PT% was 37.6%, which would rank 110th, in between Meyers Leonard and Damion Lillard. But hey, he can shoot like Steph Curry.There were several in his day. It didn't matter. The circus shots he made were Curry-esque, and he was well-guarded on a lot of them. Put Bird in today's NBA he's a taller Curry, better Curry.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVSI1_eVuhs
Are you guys stilt having this argument?
Bird may have made some crazy shots. But he missed plenty too. His FG% for his career was 49.6% which would rank him 107th this season in the NBA. His 3PT% was 37.6%, which would rank 110th, in between Meyers Leonard and Damion Lillard. But hey, he can shoot like Steph Curry.
You can say that all you want but it doesn't make it true.He played in a much tougher defensive era. In fact his FG% compared to today's NBA proves my point. Scoring is so much easier in today's NBA, everyone shoots at a higher clip. It's hard to compare eras.
But overall, in fact, scoring was much easier for most of the 1990s, including Jordan's heyday. (And it was even easier in the 1980s.) Not only was the game played faster, a clear sign that there was relatively little resistance as players went up and down the court and to the basket, but teams also scored a lot more per possession. For instance, in 1992-93, known for a rough-and-tumble series between the Knicks and the Bulls, scoring was at 108.0 points per 100 possessions. This year, it's down to 105.8, which is actually an increase from last season.
Think about that -- when the team had the ball in the 1990s, it scored more than it does now.
That's despite the following: Offensive strategy has evolved in the mathematically correct direction, which is to shoot more 3s and space the floor better. Of course, that's in part because players are more afraid to enter the lane -- watch a Clippers game for the number of times Chris Paul shies away from going to the rim because he knows he'll get hit. He has admitted as much, despite being one of the toughest, most physical point guards we've ever seen.
But defenses are so fast, physical and prepared that, even with much improved outside shooting in the game these days (the 3-point percentage across the league is 35.9, as opposed to 32.0 percent in Jordan's first championship season), scoring is down.
You can say that all you want but it doesn't make it true.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/9117632/was-jordan-era-really-more-physical-nba
Any athletic 3 or 4 in today's NBA could guard Bird.
#1...narcissist. After watching the game 7 postgame...did he even have teammates, a coach or a GM that helped him win that title? Not even a mention of Irving's game winner from James...which subsequently won the series for the Cavs. "I did it, against all odds." Good grief.
Shaq would make Wilt cry and then take his lunch.
2. i watched jordan play. lebron may be more physical but jordan had more pizzazz.
I don't remember MJ ever getting triple doubles or double digit assists or double digit rebounds likes LeBron has over & over & over again.
#1...narcissist. After watching the game 7 postgame...did he even have teammates, a coach or a GM that helped him win that title? Not even a mention of Irving's game winner from James...which subsequently won the series for the Cavs. "I did it, against all odds." Good grief.