not to be confused with Men Without Hats!
Serious question - What was so bad about the Bruce VandeVelde thread that a certain moderator determined it should be "locked"?
The thread originator seriously wanted to know what had become of BVD and there was actually a little debate about the pro's and con's of his tenure. There was a little rancor in the thread as well, but nothing that doesn't go on in probably 25% of the threads on this site (and 100% of threads with mention of Dan McCarney).
What criteria does a moderator use when determining whether or not a thread should be locked?
I for one thought it was a legitimate topic! Can you unlock it?
FREE BVD! FREE BVD! FREE BVD!
P.S. I love the site!
Serious question - What was so bad about the Bruce VandeVelde thread that a certain moderator determined it should be "locked"?
The thread originator seriously wanted to know what had become of BVD and there was actually a little debate about the pro's and con's of his tenure. There was a little rancor in the thread as well, but nothing that doesn't go on in probably 25% of the threads on this site (and 100% of threads with mention of Dan McCarney).
What criteria does a moderator use when determining whether or not a thread should be locked?
I for one thought it was a legitimate topic! Can you unlock it?
FREE BVD! FREE BVD! FREE BVD!
P.S. I love the site!