Nope, I understood exactly what you said, and chose to reply as I did. That’s called “a discussion”. I disagreed and expanded on what you said, rather than limiting myself to your points.
Two more corrections. One, I haven’t even remotely claimed to know everything about JT. I made statements I know from direct observation, that’s all. Nothing more.
Every single word I wrote is true. Literally. If you made any other inferences (as you apparently did), that’s on you.
And two, I’m not assuming you’re an idiot. However, with this post you’re not exactly doing yourself any favors, repeatedly drawing invalid conclusions. Seems to be a habit.
Good luck with that.