I am a die hard Cyclone alum who is living in Scotland this year. My best friend Rich is an Iowa fan. Rich emailed me the following thoughts from himself and a link to an article out of the Free man electronic Webster Iowa Newspaper or whatever it is. The article and his ideas try to demonize the Big 12 Commissioner and the Insight Bowl Committee as trying to get back at Nebraska for leaving the Big 12. Please offer me counter arguments to the following letter with link, because I don't buy it and feel Beebe is bigger than that.
Rich says: "The fact that Missouri has the highest BCS rating and thus deserves the bid over Nebraska, the North Division champ, makes logical since but
is not normal reality in the Bowl selection process. Once you get past
the strict guidelines for the five BCS Bowls (Champs from the Big 10,
PAC 10, Big 12, SEC, ACC and Big East are guaranteed spots, and no more
then 2 schools from any one conference can play in a BCS bowl), the selection
process for the remaining 30 bowls is often questionable and inconsistent
at best. It's very similar with the rankings. How in the world can they
justify ranking Missouri 6 spots higher than Nebraska when Nebraska and
Missouri had the same record going into the Big 12 Championship game, and
Nebraska owns a convincing win over Missouri during the season?
Look no further than last year's Insight Bowl and Iowa State to prove my point.
FOOTBALL: Cyclones accept bid to play in Insight Bowl - Iowa State Daily: Football - FOOTBALL: Cyclones accept bid to play in Insight Bowl : Football
The above link writes about how last years Iowa State team (6-6) got selected
to the Insight Bowl over last years Missouri team (8-4). The main reason was
the fact that Iowa State travels well, and would bring thousands more fans to
Tempe for the bowl game then would Missouri.
So, we fast forward to 2010, and the same Bowl this year decides now to take a
10-2 Missouri team over a 10-3 Nebraska team that clobbered Missouri and as a
result won the Big 12 North? Add to that the fact that Nebraska brings their
whole state to their Bowl game. Sorry, but one can not help but smell a skunk
here."
I say Missouri is ranked higher in the BCS and had a better record in the last 4 games than Nebraska. Also, ISU took NU into overtime before losing while losing to MU by 13-0. The only argument is MU lost to NU in the regular season, offer me counter arguments for me to give my buddy. Thanks, Dr. J
Rich says: "The fact that Missouri has the highest BCS rating and thus deserves the bid over Nebraska, the North Division champ, makes logical since but
is not normal reality in the Bowl selection process. Once you get past
the strict guidelines for the five BCS Bowls (Champs from the Big 10,
PAC 10, Big 12, SEC, ACC and Big East are guaranteed spots, and no more
then 2 schools from any one conference can play in a BCS bowl), the selection
process for the remaining 30 bowls is often questionable and inconsistent
at best. It's very similar with the rankings. How in the world can they
justify ranking Missouri 6 spots higher than Nebraska when Nebraska and
Missouri had the same record going into the Big 12 Championship game, and
Nebraska owns a convincing win over Missouri during the season?
Look no further than last year's Insight Bowl and Iowa State to prove my point.
FOOTBALL: Cyclones accept bid to play in Insight Bowl - Iowa State Daily: Football - FOOTBALL: Cyclones accept bid to play in Insight Bowl : Football
The above link writes about how last years Iowa State team (6-6) got selected
to the Insight Bowl over last years Missouri team (8-4). The main reason was
the fact that Iowa State travels well, and would bring thousands more fans to
Tempe for the bowl game then would Missouri.
So, we fast forward to 2010, and the same Bowl this year decides now to take a
10-2 Missouri team over a 10-3 Nebraska team that clobbered Missouri and as a
result won the Big 12 North? Add to that the fact that Nebraska brings their
whole state to their Bowl game. Sorry, but one can not help but smell a skunk
here."
I say Missouri is ranked higher in the BCS and had a better record in the last 4 games than Nebraska. Also, ISU took NU into overtime before losing while losing to MU by 13-0. The only argument is MU lost to NU in the regular season, offer me counter arguments for me to give my buddy. Thanks, Dr. J