SI.com coaching awards. Spoiler: The Mayor wins one

EggMcClone

Well-Known Member
Mar 19, 2006
2,374
42
48
43
Michigan
mylifeinthebasement.blogspot.com
John Calipari, Steve Prohm among SI.com's coaching award honorees - Luke Winn - SI.com

4. After-Timeout Efficiency King: Fred Hoiberg, Iowa State
So much for the concerns about Hoiberg having zero coaching experience prior to being hired by ISU: He was the game's best timeout tactician this season, even ahead of well-established coaches such as Thad Matta and Calipari. I ran strength-of-schedule adjustments on Synergy Sports Technology's After-Timeout Efficiency data, and the Cyclones ranked No. 1 at 1.093 adjusted points per possession, followed by Ohio State at 1.066 and Kentucky at 1.019. While the Buckeyes and Wildcats had top-10 overall offenses, the Cyclones ranked 23rd, making their national-best ATO figures even more significant.
The entire adjusted-ATO top 10: 1) Iowa State, 2) Ohio State, 3) Kentucky, 4) Colorado State, 5) Rider, 6) Indiana, 7) Belmont, 8) Creighton, 9) Duke, 10) Wichita State. (Smart hire of Tim Miles from Colorado State, Nebraska. Dude can coach.)
 

khaal53

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 13, 2006
2,852
533
113
40
You know what boggles my mind the most about this? Just how few teams are able to average more than 1 point per possession in possessions after timeouts. Throughout the flow of games this year six Big 12 teams alone averaged 1.05+ points per possession.

To me this shows the advantage that defenses have after timeouts and makes you wonder why coaches use timeouts to "set up plays" as often as they do but especially with the "use it or lose it" time out at the end of the first half.
 
  • Like
Reactions: reignofthetiger

reignofthetiger

Active Member
Apr 24, 2010
448
105
43
Carmel, IN
You know what boggles my mind the most about this? Just how few teams are able to average more than 1 point per possession in possessions after timeouts. Throughout the flow of games this year six Big 12 teams alone averaged 1.05+ points per possession.

To me this shows the advantage that defenses have after timeouts and makes you wonder why coaches use timeouts to "set up plays" as often as they do but especially with the "use it or lose it" time out at the end of the first half.

+1
 

Naughtius

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,646
303
83
Central IA
Somebody needs to go back through all of our losses, and find out how many TO's we had going into halftime and at the end of the game. Then email JP to tell him Fred is leaving points off the board. He's ripping off the University!

In fact, we may want to alert the NCAA. This smells of point shaving.
 

khaal53

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 13, 2006
2,852
533
113
40
Somebody needs to go back through all of our losses, and find out how many TO's we had going into halftime and at the end of the game. Then email JP to tell him Fred is leaving points off the board. He's ripping off the University!

In fact, we may want to alert the NCAA. This smells of point shaving.

Yes, I'm an idiot!
 

longtimeclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2009
7,952
230
63
Up north
Somebody needs to go back through all of our losses, and find out how many TO's we had going into halftime and at the end of the game. Then email JP to tell him Fred is leaving points off the board. He's ripping off the University!

In fact, we may want to alert the NCAA. This smells of point shaving.[/QUOTE]

Shhh we don't want to give the NCAA any ideas now
 

jbhtexas

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
14,144
4,098
113
Arlington, TX
To me this shows the advantage that defenses have after timeouts and makes you wonder why coaches use timeouts to "set up plays" as often as they do but especially with the "use it or lose it" time out at the end of the first half.

Perhaps the coaches fear the UCONN syndrome...
 

Naughtius

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,646
303
83
Central IA
Wonder what McDormatt's stats would look like, especially the "Wait 4 seconds, then throw the ball down the length of the court and hope one of our guys gets to it first" play?
 

CLONECONES

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2012
7,614
480
83
RVA
Wonder what McDormatt's stats would look like, especially the "Wait 4 seconds, then throw the ball down the length of the court and hope one of our guys gets to it first" play?


Socialist%2B%252B%2BFacepalm.png
 

MrOtter

Member
Sep 6, 2010
562
19
18
Fort Collins, CO
Wonder what McDormatt's stats would look like, especially the "Wait 4 seconds, then throw the ball down the length of the court and hope one of our guys gets to it first" play?

The entire adjusted-ATO top 10: 1) Iowa State, 2) Ohio State, 3) Kentucky, 4) Colorado State, 5) Rider, 6) Indiana, 7) Belmont, 8) Creighton, 9) Duke, 10) Wichita State. (Smart hire of Tim Miles from Colorado State, Nebraska. Dude can coach.)

You're on a roll today...
 

Naughtius

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,646
303
83
Central IA
The entire adjusted-ATO top 10: 1) Iowa State, 2) Ohio State, 3) Kentucky, 4) Colorado State, 5) Rider, 6) Indiana, 7) Belmont, 8) Creighton, 9) Duke, 10) Wichita State. (Smart hire of Tim Miles from Colorado State, Nebraska. Dude can coach.)

You're on a roll today...

My bad. Meant to indicate during his ISU tenure.
 

Ficklone02

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,702
377
83
City by the Bay
You know what boggles my mind the most about this? Just how few teams are able to average more than 1 point per possession in possessions after timeouts. Throughout the flow of games this year six Big 12 teams alone averaged 1.05+ points per possession.

To me this shows the advantage that defenses have after timeouts and makes you wonder why coaches use timeouts to "set up plays" as often as they do but especially with the "use it or lose it" time out at the end of the first half.
The comparison doesn't surprise me too much. How many times does a team like KU or Missouri or Baylor get a steal and runout layup? Heck of a lot easier to have offensive efficiency when the defense isn't setup. Obviously a coach will only call a timeout to setup a play when the defense is already set anywase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: khaal53

Jordanj6502

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,096
81
48
Ames
You know what boggles my mind the most about this? Just how few teams are able to average more than 1 point per possession in possessions after timeouts. Throughout the flow of games this year six Big 12 teams alone averaged 1.05+ points per possession.

To me this shows the advantage that defenses have after timeouts and makes you wonder why coaches use timeouts to "set up plays" as often as they do but especially with the "use it or lose it" time out at the end of the first half.


The comparison doesn't surprise me too much. How many times does a team like KU or Missouri or Baylor get a steal and runout layup? Heck of a lot easier to have offensive efficiency when the defense isn't setup. Obviously a coach will only call a timeout to setup a play when the defense is already set anywase.

Was thinking along a similar line. I wonder how the stats would look if you excluded fast break opportunities.
 

ahaselhu

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2007
1,871
64
48
Clarinda, IA
Wonder what McDormatt's stats would look like, especially the "Wait 4 seconds, then throw the ball down the length of the court and hope one of our guys gets to it first" play?

I'd be curious to know what McDermott's stats looked like at ISU as well. It seemed to me, even in Hoiberg's first year, that we were much better out of timeouts than we ever were with Greg.
 

tim_redd

Well-Known Member
Mar 29, 2006
13,162
7,981
113
41
Ankeny
I have today marked down as one of the greatest days in isu basketball history. what is everyone doing today to celebrate?