Thats your opinion, mine is that it isn't the purview of a reputable University to sponsor and manage a giant drunk fest with history of property damage, several deaths, and bad press. I would like to see a university-wide celebration return, but it needs to be done in a very careful and deliberate way to avoid turning into what VEISHEA became. Also, VEISHEA was going to be cancelled with or without Tom Hill being at ISU.
History of property damage... yet i bet most ames businesses would rather still have veishea because it was a cash cow for the area.
As for the deaths... all were off campus and most werent even really veishea-related... they were things that could happen on any weekend (like a guy sitting on a balcony and falling off). Should we cancel football because the crime rate goes way up on gamedays?
And who said anything about it 'managing a giant drunk fest'? How about exploring solutions to work with the community like they did in the first veishea back in 04? How about not repeating the same exact mistake from 2004 and funneling a party that was broken up right into a congested area?
As far as being 'careful and deliberate' with bringing something back, there's no reason they couldnt've done that between years, examining solutions and implementing them. Even if it had to take a year off like it did in 05 (and that made 06 a very successful, much improved veishea when they implemented all the changes)