I think you’re understating the risks a bit. Your club or league going under hurts the fans. Also, I’m not sure we know how effective things like a salary cap would be in a pro/rel league, so a small number of teams may dominate the league with no one else having a realistic chance. That’s not good for the fans.All of the downsides of pro/rel come from the billionaire owner side. I really don't see any downsides for the everyday fan. More teams get a chance to move up in the world (and down making the ending of the season for the bottom tier teams much more exciting), the owners have a stake in the team performing well and the culture of every medium sized city having a team would be amazing. I would jump on a Des Moines based soccer team in a heart beat, it's long due that we have a professional team owned by Iowans, not the farm teams we have now that literally no one cares wins or loses.
I’ve already said I’d be excited for this to pass, so I think the risks of USL implementing it are worth it, but it’s not like there are no risks for the fans.
Edit: one other thing to keep in mind, sports leagues are a zero sum game. So I’m not sure you can really justify it by saying “bad owners get relegated” because even with everyone being perfect owners someone is getting relegated
Because they still want to watch professional soccer. And pretty much everyone has their limit. My point is just that if you’re already willing to be a fan of a USL championship team (so a team not in the top league) you’re more likely going to be a fan if they are a USL league 1 team.Then why not just go to a 5th grade YMCA league game?
If folks really don't care, that says a lot about the league.