Playing Colvin - Mac's biggest mistake

Clone1450

Active Member
Dec 30, 2008
658
63
28
44
Kansas City
What Colvin did to get suspended affected the coaches and players. As long as the coaches and players were in agreement Colvin should play, I really feel I have no reason to be upset with Coach Mac. There were significant changes to the roster that warranted Mac reassessing his options for both his personal reasons ans well as the team. The fact that he went to the team to get their opinion and the rest of the coaches shows he is a leader.

Now if Colvin was accused of raping a girl in a "ghost room", and the suspensions was lifted given the circumstances, I would be ****** as hell right now as a fan. If he was charged with a DUI riding a moped down the street through an accident scene, yes I would be ******. If he was passed out in an alley, yes I would be ******. If he punched a cabbie in the face, yes I would be ******.

He disrespected the coaches and players. Ultimatley they made the decision to let him play earlier than planned. Why anyone else cares amazes me. I believe it is just displaced frustration for the lack of wins.


Good Post.

Had he decided to lift Red Shirts, this thread would be ablut how he ruined the development of a young player and hurt his career when he could have just played Colvin...
 

galactawitz

Active Member
Nov 27, 2007
808
123
43
Ames
I purely made the Chizik reference in the fact that he made a big splash with his quotes when Colvin was suspended. Then turned around a few weeks later and went back on them using a team vote as an attempt to not take heat for going back on his strong words. That burns me. While ISU hasn't been the most successful program in athletics due to our abundance of integrity and willingness to do things the right way, it is one of the things that makes me proud to be a Cyclone fan. I felt like that honor, that integrity, that sets us apart from other programs took a hit by how this was handled. That type of thing really lights a fire for me because we have shown that we are better then that.

I appreciate the explanation and can see where you are coming from with that. I guess for me personally it isn't a huge hit on his integrity. We are talking about a guy who was suspended because of his attitude. This isn't a Pierre Pierce situation, or even a Brian Ferentz situation. It was strictly a situation where his actions to the team were detrimental. Not letting him play last night to me would have been much more detrimental than holding him out. The reason he was suspended was to prove a point, I think that point was proven. I can understand people don't agree with it. What I don't understand is how big of deal it has become.
 

RossHallHero

Active Member
Jul 8, 2009
905
45
28
Actually, RossHallHero says "coward".

Survey says RossHallHero is an idiot. You have absolutely no idea what you are blathering on about and make no sense at all.


Yeah, you're right. It makes perfectly good sense to let the players decide if the punishment should be lifted.

Afterall, that's what they're here for. To coach this basketball team. They should have input on suspensions, playing time, style of play, everything. They are the team, right? It affects them the most, right? I mean, it's the team's style of play, so it should be the team's decision.

Every person who is OK with this because the team decided to lift the punishment should also realize that it's this same team that had absolutely NO LEADERS on it to police their own in the first place. This team couldn't keep a true freshman in line and let him know what's acceptable and what's not.

If this team that Mac is relying on to make his coaching decisions had any leaders, the Colvin situation would've been nipped in the bud by the leaders of the team far before it required a suspension.

The emperor has no clothes.
 

galactawitz

Active Member
Nov 27, 2007
808
123
43
Ames
What Colvin did to get suspended affected the coaches and players. As long as the coaches and players were in agreement Colvin should play, I really feel I have no reason to be upset with Coach Mac. There were significant changes to the roster that warranted Mac reassessing his options for both his personal reasons ans well as the team. The fact that he went to the team to get their opinion and the rest of the coaches shows he is a leader.

Now if Colvin was accused of raping a girl in a "ghost room", and the suspensions was lifted given the circumstances, I would be ****** as hell right now as a fan. If he was charged with a DUI riding a moped down the street through an accident scene, yes I would be ******. If he was passed out in an alley, yes I would be ******. If he punched a cabbie in the face, yes I would be ******.

He disrespected the coaches and players. Ultimatley they made the decision to let him play earlier than planned. Why anyone else cares amazes me. I believe it is just displaced frustration for the lack of wins.

Copy and paste this in for my exact thoughts. Great Post! The only thing i would do is cut back on the vulgarities a bit. Other than that AGREE 100%. Sanity is a good thing. Again playing with 7 is not an option. Not in High School, not in Non- Conference, and certainly not in the Big 12. It would have been an embarrassment, and not fair to the rest of this team, which I still am proud of to have as Cyclones.
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,572
39,417
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
I think the other thing that keeps getting missed is the team aspect. How many times have any of you who played organized sports been "punished" for whatever action of one team member whether that is re-running a drill, running extra sprints or even losing because a star player was either suspended or held out of competition?

What lesson does the one team member take from that? How about "I won't do that again, everyone is ****** at me" or "They are going to kick my ***."

What lesson do the other team members take from that? How about "I won't let him or anyone else do that again" or "I better make sure next time it is not me or I will get my *** kicked."

The military gets this and regularly uses group punishment during training so the unit gets that they need to be self policing and that the actions of one can very negatively affect the welfare of the many.

The upshot is that McD did have a choice and if the team felt that they lost a game they shouldn't have due to CC's suspension, CC would definitely learn from it if he EVER had any chance to learn the lesson. The rest of the team would learn about consequences as well.

Sorry if I am preaching. I will shut up now. Have a great day and let's hope for the best this weekend.
 

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
While you are at it, please ask the Moral One Deace how he can defend his Michigan head football coach who was knowingly breaking the rules of practice time limits because "everyone else is doing it" and "it's a stupid rule anyway" but can trash a coach for lifting a suspension that HE put in place????

While those are all **** porr excuses in the case that rules were broken and I disagreed with that argument from Deace, as of right now, all the info saying that those rules were broken was made by a transfer. There were supposedly more sources but none were named and the names that were thrown out are likely disgruntled players. There is an investigation into this which should be concluding soon and hopefully there are some facts associated with that. It should be noted that situation stemmed from a Freep article noting Tony Clemons as the main source. Tony Clemons was a highly rated recruit who frankly wasn't that good and transferred out to Colorado last year. Not someone I would hold in high credibility. I am not saying there was nothing wrongfully done, I am just saying right now the credibility of it seems to thin.

Having said all of that, those are pretty different situations but I agree with your point on Deace. He is biased against us and does hold himself morally higher than us.
 

yoteforever

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2008
515
279
63
In all candor, I can understand why fans have said that by playing Colvin Coach Mac lost his values. I can understand why fans of Iowa State basketball are disappointed so far in the teams record. I can understand why Hilton for the most part has gone to a low humm (exception was Texas). But what I don't understand is the total lack of compasssion for Greg, his staff, and the member of this team that are playing their *** off for ISU fans.

Wouldn't it just be easier to lineup one by one and kick Coach Mac in the nuts? I mean c'mon, how many coaches have you ever heard of that has had to put up with even a small percentage of crap Greg has had to deal with? What has transpired this season is nothing short of unbelievable.

The thread deals with playing Colvin, so I'll focus on that. Are all of you out there so "high and almighty" (and I'll add inflexible) that you NEVER change your mind on something? Good lord, we head to Lubbock with 7 players (without Colvin). Talk about a potential embarrassing situation. Say we have to play four guys, and ESPN talks about how there is a 5th on the bench, but under "coaches suspension" so he doesn't play. How frickin stupid does that makes us look like?

I go to every home game without fail, and I drive a long way to do so. When Coach Mac suspended Colvin for the Duke outburts along with other total crap, I supported that move. I then have watched Colvins actions as he has been serving his suspension, and he has become vocal and positive. Those were the changes Coach Mac desired to obtain. Maybe just maybe, Chris is a quick learner. If so, and he now maintains the right attitude and approach to the game, the suspension (although shortened) has served the purpose it was intended for. Combine that with the fact that Greg let the team vote, tells me the team knows more about what is going on than we do as a fan base.

For all you Mac haters, keep pushing, you'll probably get what you want. But for the love of God, have some compassion for what he has gone through. I bet the better number of you had it happened to you would have folded your tent and walked away.

Coach Mac: Until you step down, you are MY coach.........best wishes
 

DaddyMac

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
14,070
453
83
I would say that it is much easier for a coach (in the public's eye) to extend a suspension than it is to shorten one abruptly. Had Feb 1st rolled around and Greg didn't feel CC was living up to his part of the deal, he could have just said that and a lot of people would have praised him for staying true to what he feels is the right thing to do.

This move just makes him look desperate.

Given he's lost 4 players the past 2 weeks or so, he probably is desperate. That much is understood.
 

dfwcy

Active Member
Oct 20, 2008
485
85
28
Can anyone tell me how this is any different from what Chip Kelly did at Oregon with Blount?



It is very similar and both coaches were wrong. They both said they were going to do something and went back on their word.

Kelly needed Blount to help win a Pac 10 championship so he caved in and Mac needed Colvin to help win B12 games and he caved.
 

DaddyMac

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
14,070
453
83
Can anyone tell me how this is any different from what Chip Kelly did at Oregon with Blount?

Colvin didn't punch and opposing player, go after his own teammates, try to go after fans in the stands and need to be pulled off the court/field by coaches/players/staff.

Duh... :wink:
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
McD made a decision. Then wanted to backtrack without making himself look bad. So he goes to the team and makes them vote.

Good thing the team voted like Greg wanted them too. Otherwise McD might have gone to Pollard and asked him to decide. And if Pollard had said no, he could have always gone to the student body and had them vote. Surely, the student body would say yes to brining Colvin back. If the student body said yes, who is poor McD to say no to the voice of Iowa State University?
 

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
Can anyone tell me how this is any different from what Chip Kelly did at Oregon with Blount?

Well, what Blount did wasn't against his team directly. That was more of an assault issue. I see them as pretty different I guess.
 

kg-cyclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
4,113
164
63
McD made a decision. Then wanted to backtrack without making himself look bad. So he goes to the team and makes them vote.

Good thing the team voted like Greg wanted them too. Otherwise McD might have gone to Pollard and asked him to decide. And if Pollard had said no, he could have always gone to the student body and had them vote. Surely, the student body would say yes to brining Colvin back. If the student body said yes, who is poor McD to say no to the voice of Iowa State University?

Haha...Got their input to suspend him too, what do you call that?
 

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
McD made a decision. Then wanted to backtrack without making himself look bad. So he goes to the team and makes them vote.

Good thing the team voted like Greg wanted them too. Otherwise McD might have gone to Pollard and asked him to decide. And if Pollard had said no, he could have always gone to the student body and had them vote. Surely, the student body would say yes to brining Colvin back. If the student body said yes, who is poor McD to say no to the voice of Iowa State University?

Except the team and Mac are the ones that know everything that went on. nice try though.
 

Cyclonestate78

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2008
12,115
646
113
Actually, RossHallHero says "coward".

Survey says RossHallHero is an idiot. You have absolutely no idea what you are blathering on about and make no sense at all.

Wrong answer. He is driving home a point. GMAC is the coach, the leader, the CEO, the one who was hired and paid a large amount of money to be the guy making the decisions for this program. Do we really want a coach that delegates his responsibility for making decisions for this program to his players by having the team vote? So do we now have a vote on how long practice should be? Wind sprints or no wind sprints today? Do we practice free throws? Rebounding drills? Who should we recruit?

The point is really that when you start letting the players make the decisions that you as the head coach should be making it is the first step in losing control of the team. Pretty soon everything becomes a democracy. Compound that with the fact that the players now know that because of the teams lack of depth GMAC has shown that he will not follow through with the punishments that he has specifically stated. Thus they know that they are pretty much free to do whatever they want with no regard for any disciplinary action because the coach has already shown them that he won't follow through.

Will that happen? Not necessarily. Has it opened the door for that? Yes.
 

JonDMiller

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2006
2,538
192
63
Kelly needed Blount to help win a Pac 10 championship so he caved in .

I disagree. Blount didn't play against against Cal, USC, Stanford, Arizona State, Arizona, or anyone else in the Pac 10 other than Oregon State in the season finale. An I don't think they needed him, as James had over 155 rushing
 

IcSyU

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2007
28,309
6,981
113
Just because the vote says one thing doesn't mean it was going to be done that way. Look at the United States. You can get the Presidency without getting the majority of the votes.
 

RossHallHero

Active Member
Jul 8, 2009
905
45
28
Compound that with the fact that the players now know that because of the teams lack of depth GMAC has shown that he will not follow through with the punishments that he has specifically stated. Thus they know that they are pretty much free to do whatever they want with no regard for any disciplinary action because the coach has already shown them that he won't follow through.

Will that happen? Not necessarily. Has it opened the door for that? Yes.


This is a great point.

Great point.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,376
47,086
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Yeah, you're right. It makes perfectly good sense to let the players decide if the punishment should be lifted.
.


Another complete failure of a post by you. Count me as not surprised.

You have no evidence that the players "decided" that the suspension should be lifted. That is conjured up in your own head.

McDermott got input from the players, absolutely yes. As any good coach would.

The players made the decision: absolutely not, from everything I've read.