Re: Poll: Can message boards play a factor into a potential recruit coming to Iowa St
The same reason we discuss anything on this board. 99% of this board could think GMac should be fired. Doesn't mean he should? We come here to discuss. Every few months this topic gets brought up and my opinion gets shot down with no evidence... but simple posts similar to this: 'You have to be rediculous to believe that what gets said on here can affect a recruit. Come on... seriously??? WOW!'
It gives me peace of mind that others may share the same opinion as me... yet I don't wish to skew the results to fit my opinion. I want valid stats to prove that it's not "rediculous to think this way".
And I think that providing the results of a poll where at least 50% of the participants given a large enough sample size... (without sneaky wording used to 'trick' people into a specific answer) is valid proof that it's not "rediculous to think such a thing".
3 months from now, I can simply link to this post. Is that valid enough of a reason for you? Hopefully I've justified my privilege to post my opinions and polls on this message board.
Why does it matter so much to you whether people think such a thing has happened? 99% of the people could think that such a situation has occurred, but that doesn't mean that it has.
The same reason we discuss anything on this board. 99% of this board could think GMac should be fired. Doesn't mean he should? We come here to discuss. Every few months this topic gets brought up and my opinion gets shot down with no evidence... but simple posts similar to this: 'You have to be rediculous to believe that what gets said on here can affect a recruit. Come on... seriously??? WOW!'
It gives me peace of mind that others may share the same opinion as me... yet I don't wish to skew the results to fit my opinion. I want valid stats to prove that it's not "rediculous to think this way".
And I think that providing the results of a poll where at least 50% of the participants given a large enough sample size... (without sneaky wording used to 'trick' people into a specific answer) is valid proof that it's not "rediculous to think such a thing".
3 months from now, I can simply link to this post. Is that valid enough of a reason for you? Hopefully I've justified my privilege to post my opinions and polls on this message board.
Last edited: