Jordan vs. Bryant vs. James

Bobber

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
8,880
576
113
Hudson, Iowa
MJ was the best I've ever seen and probably the best I'll ever see. Not only was he a great player, he was a great team player who made his team mates around him better.

Kobe and James are great player no doubt, but seems to be more about them than the rest of the team.

It's like comparing Bill Russel to Wilt Chamberlin.
 

DJK15

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2008
3,690
138
63
I hate hearing that Jordan had a way better cast, Jordan made that cast of players great.

No kidding, MJ didn't have the benefit of a top 5 big man like Kobe has/does (Shaq, Gasol, Bynum).
 

ISUcy08

Well-Known Member
Dec 22, 2008
1,959
60
48
I would say Jordan for everything except rebounder and dunker. Lebron is a good rebounder. It's a toss up for dunker between LBJ and Mike. Mike had some awesome dunks, but LBJ is a powerful dunker!
 

Clones85'

Just Win Baby
Jan 31, 2007
13,242
645
113
Out of the three...

Best scorer: Jordan
Best pure shooter: Kobe
Best rebounder: Lebron
Best defender: Kobe/Jordan
Best distributor: Lebron
Best ball handler: Jordan
Best dunker: Jordan
Best in the clutch: Jordan w/ Kobe close
Most athletic: Lebron

Best all-around: Jordan

This is correct
 

Clones85'

Just Win Baby
Jan 31, 2007
13,242
645
113
No kidding, MJ didn't have the benefit of a top 5 big man like Kobe has/does (Shaq, Gasol, Bynum).

He had a top 50 player of all time in Pippen and the best rebounder of all time in Rodman. Jordan's team were more stacked than any of Kobe's teams have been. When Jordan retired the Bulls still won over 50 games. How many you think the Lakers win without Kobe?

Jordan is the best, but this talk about him not having a great team is ridiculous.
 

Rhoadhoused

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2010
11,211
245
63
34
Ames, IA
I hate the rings argument, one person can't win a championship. Anyway, what does postseason play have to do with anything except clutch performance? Remember when LeBron scored 25 straight points to beat Detroit in the playoffs? No championship, but is that his fault? Jordan is the GOAT no doubt, but I think rings are overrated when comparing individual performance.
 

hawkeyeguy85

Member
Jan 17, 2007
222
13
18
He had a top 50 player of all time in Pippen and the best rebounder of all time in Rodman. Jordan's team were more stacked than any of Kobe's teams have been. When Jordan retired the Bulls still won over 50 games. How many you think the Lakers win without Kobe?

Jordan is the best, but this talk about him not having a great team is ridiculous.

He only had Rodman the second time around...not first three.

Not saying you didn't remember, but I've seen a lot of people lately that toss out Rodman as having been there all along.
 

Clones85'

Just Win Baby
Jan 31, 2007
13,242
645
113
He only had Rodman the second time around...not first three.

Not saying you didn't remember, but I've seen a lot of people lately that toss out Rodman as having been there all along.

And Kobe only had Gasol the last 2...what does it matter?

MJ had great supporting casts. Great. To say otherwise is false.
 

Istater4life

Active Member
Jun 14, 2010
408
221
43
I would like to see Kobe try and win a title with Luc Longley, Bill Wennington, and Jud Buechler.
 

Clones85'

Just Win Baby
Jan 31, 2007
13,242
645
113
I would like to see Kobe try and win a title with Luc Longley, Bill Wennington, and Jud Buechler.

You are forgetting the other guys. Pippen, Grant, Paxson, Armstrong. When Jordan retired the Bulls went 55-27 and were 2nd in the East. Don't tell me that Jordan had no help as they were damn good without him.

This talk that MJ didn't have the supporting cast is laughable.

And I still say that MJ played in the weakest talent period in NBA history. No other stars to push him
 

Clone9

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2006
3,266
1,177
113
Boston, MA
phil jackson says otherwise, and shaq is not even close to a complete player, so no it wasnt his team, he was a supporting cast

Did you really just say that Shaq was supporting cast? Shaq is one of the top 50 players of ALL TIME. Kobe was young during those championships. He was not the leader of the team. Shaq was the leader, without question. Shaq was the best player on those teams.

For the last 2 titles, Kobe is the unquestioned leader of the team. He also has a great supporting case in Pau, Odom, Fisher, etc.


IMO, Jordan was the best ever. He could take over a game whenever he wanted to and do anything he wanted. Kobe doesn't do this as consistently as Jordan did. Therefore, Jordan is better. In fact, Kobe isn't even the best Laker ever.
 

cyclonenum1

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
7,191
330
83
You are forgetting the other guys. Pippen, Grant, Paxson, Armstrong. When Jordan retired the Bulls went 55-27 and were 2nd in the East. Don't tell me that Jordan had no help as they were damn good without him.

This talk that MJ didn't have the supporting cast is laughable.

And I still say that MJ played in the weakest talent period in NBA history. No other stars to push him

Both excellent points that I agree with. The NBA was very strong in the 80s...lots of top talent. However, it dropped off dramatically in the 90s. I think the NBA today is much stronger overall than in the 90s...in large part due to the tremendous influx of very good foreign players.
 

cyclonenum1

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
7,191
330
83
Did you really just say that Shaq was supporting cast? Shaq is one of the top 50 players of ALL TIME. Kobe was young during those championships. He was not the leader of the team. Shaq was the leader, without question. Shaq was the best player on those teams.

For the last 2 titles, Kobe is the unquestioned leader of the team. He also has a great supporting case in Pau, Odom, Fisher, etc.


IMO, Jordan was the best ever. He could take over a game whenever he wanted to and do anything he wanted. Kobe doesn't do this as consistently as Jordan did. Therefore, Jordan is better. In fact, Kobe isn't even the best Laker ever.

Yeah...I agree...what a comical comment to call Shaq a "role player". He might be that at this point in his career but there was a time he was the most dominant player in the league. In fact, he was so dominant that the only way you could really stop him was using the "hack-a-Shaq" technique and just count on him missing half of his free throws.
 

michaelrr1

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
8,235
1,895
113
WDM
jordan was great, now doubt about that. Me and my dad used to eat dinner in the living room to watch every game. The thing about Jordan is he had literally the perfect team surrounding him. Part of me wonders what would of happened if rodman/pippen/kerr/longley werent around.

jordan had better competition, but he also had a much better team. Thats why i put kobe next to jordan. Lebron, albeit a lot more physical talent, his name will be forever scarred because he could never win it in cleveland.


my favorite memory of jordan is when mutumbo tried to dunk on jordan and he stuffed it entirely. Running back he turned around and waddled his finger back at mutumbo.

That question has already been answered. These players, save Pippen, were only with him for the last 3 championships. The first 3 came with an entirely different roster - Paxson, Armstrong, Grant, Cartwright.
 

Istater4life

Active Member
Jun 14, 2010
408
221
43
You are forgetting the other guys. Pippen, Grant, Paxson, Armstrong. When Jordan retired the Bulls went 55-27 and were 2nd in the East. Don't tell me that Jordan had no help as they were damn good without him.

This talk that MJ didn't have the supporting cast is laughable.

And I still say that MJ played in the weakest talent period in NBA history. No other stars to push him

I wouldn't say that was a weak talent period with the likes of Karl Malone, John Stockton, Patrick Ewing, Shaq, David Robinson, Olajuwon, Isiah Thomas, Reggie Miller.
 

Clonefan94

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
11,204
6,258
113
Schaumburg, IL
Yeah...I agree...what a comical comment to call Shaq a "role player". He might be that at this point in his career but there was a time he was the most dominant player in the league. In fact, he was so dominant that the only way you could really stop him was using the "hack-a-Shaq" technique and just count on him missing half of his free throws.

When you stop having to compare people to Jordan, that's when you know they'll be the best. If there is a doubt, sorry, it's still Jordan.