Who should the NCAA be punishing, the people spending the money on recruits or the recruits who receive the money? It is certainly unethical for the recruits to accept any money, but it is purely reactive to suspend the player, as opposed to being proactive about curbing such transactions from taking place at all.
It is unfortunate for Cam Newton that the best way to punish Auburn is to deny him eligibility to play. However, the kid will still get a job in the pros. Look at Michael Vick; if a guy who engaged in those sorts of activities can find a job in the NFL, I have to think Newton's less morally questionable activities won't be punished by a destroyed future.
Though Chizik left this program in shambles, his leaving is obviously turning out to be a positive. The less I find myself being ****** at him for leaving the way he did.
Doesn't mean I won't enjoy it when he crashes and burns.
And, Chuck, your point was?
Hahahahahahaha ha ha ha hahhaha yes!
Bye Bye Cam Newton, and bye bye Chizzzz.
Will they get their wins taken away now?
The won't touch Chiz much likeUSC didn't touch Carrol.
Is Chizz really to blame here?
It seems that most coaches are pulling a post-Nixon mentality by turning blind eyes in regards to players/agents/boosters. This is a system crash of blue screen proportions.
So does this elevate LSU back into the conversation if it goes down?
This is my question. What are the BCS implications here? Is LSU now undefeated?
And, Chuck, your point was?
I don't think so, they still lost, but Auburn now has a 0-0 record.
Because it is not illegal for the boosters to spend that money. It is only against NCAA rules.