*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.

HiltonMagic

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
6,163
211
63
CA
Visit site

Pirate


images
 

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,497
6,983
113
49
I do think about long term planning but ECU? What I enjoy about our current conference alignments are the rivalry's and the geographically co-located schools. So adding ECU, which is the farthest east you can go in the U.S. to a conference that is in the mid-west is just stupid.

Looking long term, at up and coming teams and looking from lower tier conferences, then we need to look at teams such as Cinci and Tulsa or to the indepedent schools like BYU and ND.
past rivalries dont matter nor does geography, wish it was not the case but that is reality now
 

Tank

Well-Known Member
Sep 13, 2008
2,307
104
48
Niceville, FL
past rivalries dont matter nor does geography, wish it was not the case but that is reality now


Then if thats the case, what is stopping all the top schools in the country from making a conference that has no geographical relevance and also breaks up some old rivalries. They can then also get a top money TV deal where they get the money from ESPN, ABC, etc. and from also their own individual deals?

Super-Conference:
Texas
ND
USC
Florida
Alabama
Auburn
Florida State
Virginia Tech
Oregon
BYU
Wisky
Michigan
Ohio State
LSU
Oklahoma
Georgia
 

cyspy

Active Member
Jul 24, 2011
596
164
43
Then if thats the case, what is stopping all the top schools in the country from making a conference that has no geographical relevance and also breaks up some old rivalries. They can then also get a top money TV deal where they get the money from ESPN, ABC, etc. and from also their own individual deals?

Super-Conference:
Texas
ND
USC
Florida
Alabama
Auburn
Florida State
Virginia Tech
Oregon
BYU
Wisky
Michigan
Ohio State
LSU
Oklahoma
Georgia
.

So that's what Deloss Dodds said when he said Texas wouldn't start it but would finish it. This looks like what he was talking about.
 

cyclonedave25

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 10, 2007
21,447
11,169
113
Chicago, IL
Then if thats the case, what is stopping all the top schools in the country from making a conference that has no geographical relevance and also breaks up some old rivalries. They can then also get a top money TV deal where they get the money from ESPN, ABC, etc. and from also their own individual deals?

Super-Conference:
Texas
ND
USC
Florida
Alabama
Auburn
Florida State
Virginia Tech
Oregon
BYU
Wisky
Michigan
Ohio State
LSU
Oklahoma
Georgia
Those teams would walk away from that conference with 6-6 or so records. Maybe 8-4 at best.
 

cyspy

Active Member
Jul 24, 2011
596
164
43
Those teams would walk away from that conference with 6-6 or so records. Maybe 8-4 at best.
.

What difference does your record make anyway as long as you're making the same money as a bottomfeeder to the top teams in your conference,just go ask Indiana.
 

cyclonedave25

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 10, 2007
21,447
11,169
113
Chicago, IL
.

What difference does your record make anyway as long as you're making the same money as a bottomfeeder to the top teams in your conference,just go ask Indiana.
Nothing, if you never want to win another championship of any kind.
Why not be one of those teams and go to another conference where you have a much better chance at going undefeated. I'm sure that would please donors a lot more than just playing against the top teams in the nation week in and out, while probably losing half of those.

Donor money>>>TV money.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,558
26,012
113
I have yet to post in this thread and want a little piece of history. I really don't have anything to contribute...Notre Dame would be cool.
 

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,497
6,983
113
49
Then if thats the case, what is stopping all the top schools in the country from making a conference that has no geographical relevance and also breaks up some old rivalries. They can then also get a top money TV
Virginia Tec
Oregon
BYU
Wisky
Michigan
Ohio State
LSU
Oklahoma
Georgia

did neb care? did texas a and m care about their 100 year ild rivalries? nope..
 

cyspy

Active Member
Jul 24, 2011
596
164
43
Nothing, if you never want to win another championship of any kind.
Why not be one of those teams and go to another conference where you have a much better chance at going undefeated. I'm sure that would please donors a lot more than just playing against the top teams in the nation week in and out, while probably losing half of those.

Donor money>>>TV money.
.

I see your point and that's why one of the reasons these superconferences are not the best way to go. Let's take a school that's in the middle of the pack,why would you want four teams that may be better than you joining your conference and possibly pushing you down the standings. The Yankees need the Orioles just as much as they need the Red Sox.
 

chrishull14

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2007
1,067
34
48
Cyclone City
I think BYU is a mistake. Expanding west is a dead end. Most of the top schools are already in the PAC 12. In my opinion, expanding East has greater potential
 

nj829

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2006
5,681
157
63
Northwest Arkansas
If ECU were to come, I think there would be some east-coast teams also invited to get back to at least 12 if not 14. ECU, Pitt, UCF all candidates. If Pitt comes, Big East football may collapse and then you can add WVU as well or USF instead of UCF. Would be great to have a Texas and Florida exposure.

Maybe some of the not-so-good SEC teams would like to move out for a chance at winning in football. Ole Miss, Kentucky, and Vandy may want out to have a shot at a real bowl game that they will never have in the SEC. (yes, big longshot there)
 

F5cy

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2011
1,861
758
113
Washington, D.C.
I think BYU is a mistake. Expanding west is a dead end. Most of the top schools are already in the PAC 12. In my opinion, expanding East has greater potential

Yes, as opposed to expanding East where most of the top schools are already in the SEC, Big 10, Big East, or ACC. :jimlad:
 

isuno1fan

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
23,300
4,699
113
Clive, Iowa
I think BYU is a mistake. Expanding west is a dead end. Most of the top schools are already in the PAC 12. In my opinion, expanding East has greater potential

BYU is a national brand similar to ND. Not as big, but similar in that they are everywhere. It isn't expanding West. Adding BYU will bring up demand for the B12 across the US.
 

cyspy

Active Member
Jul 24, 2011
596
164
43
If the BIG XII stays together what teams could the PAC-12 go after that would grab any attention. In my estimation,not many if any at all. BYU would be a great addition to the BIG XII and especially because they don't have much in the way of options. It's either stay indy or BIG XII for the time being.
 

Incyte

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2007
4,956
931
83
If the BIG XII stays together what teams could the PAC-12 go after that would grab any attention. In my estimation,not many if any at all. BYU would be a great addition to the BIG XII and especially because they don't have much in the way of options. It's either stay indy or BIG XII for the time being.

China State.
 

CycloneChris

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2009
1,645
86
48
Chicago suburbs
Pitt is looking outside the Big East, but not at the Big 12.

http://blogs.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/sports/pitt-redshirt-diaries/29387-about-this-big-12-stuff-and-some-notes


BYU rumors on Twitter....

utahsportcritic Utah Sports Critic
Our source finally said that Big12 & BYU conversations will likely continue but it looks like BYU will DECLINE the offer.
11 minutes ago
»

utahsportcritic Utah Sports Critic
Source finally said that w/o UT & OU guarantees BYU didn't feel that Big12 move was strong enough to force them to leave independence.
14 minutes ago
»

utahsportcritic Utah Sports Critic
Source also said BYU had a few other demands of TV rights etc that Big12 would not agree to.
15 minutes ago
»

utahsportcritic Utah Sports Critic
Source stated that Big12 could/would not give guarantees that Texas and OU would remain in the conference.
19 minutes ago
»

utahsportcritic Utah Sports Critic
Source insider BYU told us that BYU has, or will soon, DECLINE the offer to join the Big12 conference. Working on secondary confirmation.
20 minutes ago
 
Last edited:

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,634
23,892
113
Macomb, MI
If the BIG XII stays together what teams could the PAC-12 go after that would grab any attention. In my estimation,not many if any at all. BYU would be a great addition to the BIG XII and especially because they don't have much in the way of options. It's either stay indy or BIG XII for the time being.

If the Big 12 holds firm it's very unlikely the Pac 12 expands. Even if BYU doesn't come to the Big 12, Cal-Berkely and Stanford will make sure they never have a place at their table. That leaves a lot of MWC options - Hawaii, Fresno St, Boise St, UNLV, New Mexcio, Nevada, Colorado St, and Wyoming. I can't see ANY of these schools getting added. No one in the Pac 12 is going to want to pay the travel costs associated with bringing in Hawaii. As far as the rest of those schools, I don't think any of them are up to snuff for Pac 12's educational standards.
 

CycloneChris

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2009
1,645
86
48
Chicago suburbs
If the BIG XII stays together what teams could the PAC-12 go after that would grab any attention. In my estimation,not many if any at all. BYU would be a great addition to the BIG XII and especially because they don't have much in the way of options. It's either stay indy or BIG XII for the time being.

The fact the PAC12 is limited on who they can expand with is not a good thing for the Big12.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron