*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
We can only pray whatever is going on behind the closed doors turns out to somehow save the conference. Not looking good by any means whatsoever anymore after hearing the OU comments . Guess we'll find out here soon, and I'm leaning towards it being not in favor for Iowa State and Iowa State getting stuck in a crappy non BCS conference. Absolutely sucks how Iowa State is going to get screwed from this whole ordeal. We need to find a T. Boone Pickens.

ISU is not going to get screwed. Have faith.
 

LutherClone

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2008
1,169
47
48
Phoenix, AZ
Best case for Big 12 implosion- Mizzou, OK, Okie State, KU go west to Pac 16. Texas decides to go indy. SEC adds one more, Big 10 decides to stay at 12. Hopefully Big East would want ISU, K State and Texas Tech to get to 12. ISU needs 5 BCS conferences.

I put this in the aTm thread, but I'll say it here too:

IF the Big XII explodes, I think the best bet for us is:

OU, OSU, UT and TT head west to the PAC-12/16. Mizzou is accepted by the SEC (new state, new TV markets, etc). Iowa State/K-State/KU to the Big East and are put in a division with Louisville, TCU and Cincy for football.

The ACC would stay at 12, the SEC would be alright with their 14 and I think the B1G would sit tight to see how a 16 team league would pan out in the west.

I think our safest bet in an "end of the world" scenario is that KU is set adrift with ISU and KSU. They are by far the strongest of the three brands and I think we make a far stronger package with them than a trio of ISU/KSU/Baylor when we knock on the Big East's door.

If UT would decide to fly solo, I think KU would slip into their place in the PAC-12/16. You could make an interesting argument for K-State over TT in that case for academics, but let's face it, both are bad and Stanford isn't going to love either. In the case that Texas Tech is left behind, I would see Iowa State, Baylor and TT getting the nod to the Big East... but more precarious position for us in that case as we would be an isolated NW team for football.
 

hobbes

Active Member
Feb 20, 2010
238
30
28
Chicago
I won't start worrying unless I hear rumors that Baylor prez Ken* has a new round of lawsuit threats. If Baylor is ok with what's going on, must be good.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,469
28,853
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
I put this in the aTm thread, but I'll say it here too:

IF the Big XII explodes, I think the best bet for us is:

OU, OSU, UT and TT head west to the PAC-12/16. Mizzou is accepted by the SEC (new state, new TV markets, etc). Iowa State/K-State/KU to the Big East and are put in a division with Louisville, TCU and Cincy for football.

The ACC would stay at 12, the SEC would be alright with their 14 and I think the B1G would sit tight to see how a 16 team league would pan out in the west.

I think our safest bet in an "end of the world" scenario is that KU is set adrift with ISU and KSU. They are by far the strongest of the three brands and I think we make a far stronger package with them than a trio of ISU/KSU/Baylor when we knock on the Big East's door.

If UT would decide to fly solo, I think KU would slip into their place in the PAC-12/16. You could make an interesting argument for K-State over TT in that case for academics, but let's face it, both are bad and Stanford isn't going to love either. In the case that Texas Tech is left behind, I would see Iowa State, Baylor and TT getting the nod to the Big East... but more precarious position for us in that case as we would be an isolated NW team for football.

Logic suggests this is the most likely outcome of a Big 12 explosion. Part of the reason I'm really not worried.
 

Clone83

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2006
5,074
1,075
113
That's not exactly what his statement said. Reading comprehension failure + sensationalism by ESPN.
People need to realize that this, the ESPN article linked, and the AP article linked in the KC Star are all just a subset of a much longer press conference held earlier today. A lot more was said than what is in these articles. The transcript for the first half of the press conference was linked here a few pages back. Sorry I'm not going back to find it, but know that the most recent postings are from the same source and do not represent everything that was said earlier today. It isn't new.

This is not new information, but the same information reported in different ways.

OU may leave in the end and is being contacted by other conferences, but it is at the center of trying to find new members to keep the conference together, and the OU president has been spending all of his time on this.
 

NobodyBeatsCy

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2008
3,750
633
113
Clive, IA
I don't get Boren. He has to know that comments like his throws ice cold water on every prospective member the conference is trying to get. The key words are conference stability -especially from the big names. Oklahoma decides to publicly announce that their being courted by others, and they are going to thing about it for three weeks?!?

I've been somewhat calm during this go-around this year, but this move baffles me. This is nothing short of sabotage, and this conference seems to be going down.

It's a shame that ISU is in this spot and only able to watch from the sidelines - in slow motion, much like a car wreck.
 

CycloneChris

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2009
1,645
86
48
Chicago suburbs
Outline the reasons you think it is unstable.

Big Ten is SLOW to expand. I expect them to sit back and see how the bigger conferences work.

ACC has repeatedly said that they want to stay exactly where they are. There was a LOT of push back when they moved to 12. That is one conference where basketball will have a say.

Big East will expand. Their history shows it. They will still be a BCS conference.

And why did the Big East have to expand?

Because teams left the conference for greener pastures. And who did they expand with? Teams looking to step up, not BCS Conference schools.

Sounds like you think the Big East will be stable until other conferences decide to make a move.
 
Last edited:

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
Pollard also is working on a contingency plan. He just doesn't blab it to the media for them to twist his words like OU does.

I don't get Boren. He has to know that comments like his throws ice cold water on every prospective member the conference is trying to get. The key words are conference stability -especially from the big names. Oklahoma decides to publicly announce that their being courted by others, and they are going to thing about it for three weeks?!?

I've been somewhat calm during this go-around this year, but this move baffles me. This is nothing short of sabotage, and this conference seems to be going down.

It's a shame that ISU is in this spot and only able to watch from the sidelines - in slow motion, much like a car wreck.

What makes you think ISU is watching from the sidelines. Were we watching from the sidelines last year? He'll no we weren't. And we aren't this year.
 

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
And why did the Big East have to expand?

Because teams left the conference for greener pastures. And who did they expand with? Teams looking to step up, not BCS Conference schools.

But if the big 12 imploded, who will they be expanding with this time? Ding ding. BIG 12 teams I.e. BCS teams. They will offer every Big 12 leftover they can get.

AND I also don't see more than one or 2 teams leaving. SEC will go to 14 and ACC and BIG 10 will stay at 12 for now.
 

Rogue52

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 20, 2006
8,970
3,607
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
The reason why OU's comments are troubling:

OU: "We will do what's in the best interest of the University of Oklahoma."

ISU: "We are committed to the Big XII."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.