No excuse

tm3308

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2010
8,189
1,608
113
There is simply no excuse for the Hawks losing today. They were outplayed, and out-coached. I'll have to wait and see how the season plays out before I could make an honest assessment of which team was better, but ISU was the better team today, and it wasn't even close.

Iowa's defense was completely unable to slow down Jantz. He made play after play, and while we had a few broken coverages (the TD in the North endzone and the one that got called back spring to mind), Jantz made far more pin-point passes. It wasn't just a few lucky breaks here and there.

ISU did all they could to GIVE this game away, and they still won. Turnovers, penalties. Didn't matter, Iowa wasn't able to take advantage of the Cyclone's mistakes. ISU manhandled Iowa in the trenches on BOTH sides of the ball (which shocked me, I figured the o-lines would dominate the game for both teams).

And how's about a little love for Money Reynolds, who truly was money today?

I said a couple weeks ago that I expected a competitive game, and that if ISU got a big play or two on special teams, I could easily see them winning it. Well, they had several good special teams plays.

I was losing it when we didn't go for a chance at a field goal at the end of the 4th quarter. I knew we wouldn't, but it still pi*sed me off. And it happened again after ISU offered us a window of opportunity on the offsides penalty to turn 4th and 6 into 4th and 1, yet we didn't go for it. You can't play not to lose, especially on the road, and ESPECIALLY when it's a rivalry game and the stadium is going as nuts as JTS was.

But that didn't cost us the game. Did it cost us a CHANCE to win the game? Sure. But the play of Steele Jantz and the rest of the Cyclones is what really lost this game for the Hawks.
 

ISUcy08

Well-Known Member
Dec 22, 2008
1,959
60
48
Good post! It's kind of refreshing not to hear a bunch of crap like "super bowl", Hawk fans saying Iowa simply let ISU have it, etc., like in previous years.
 

ISUcy08

Well-Known Member
Dec 22, 2008
1,959
60
48
There is simply no excuse for the Hawks losing today. They were outplayed, and out-coached. I'll have to wait and see how the season plays out before I could make an honest assessment of which team was better, but ISU was the better team today, and it wasn't even close.

Iowa's defense was completely unable to slow down Jantz. He made play after play, and while we had a few broken coverages (the TD in the North endzone and the one that got called back spring to mind), Jantz made far more pin-point passes. It wasn't just a few lucky breaks here and there.

ISU did all they could to GIVE this game away, and they still won. Turnovers, penalties. Didn't matter, Iowa wasn't able to take advantage of the Cyclone's mistakes. ISU manhandled Iowa in the trenches on BOTH sides of the ball (which shocked me, I figured the o-lines would dominate the game for both teams).

And how's about a little love for Money Reynolds, who truly was money today?

I said a couple weeks ago that I expected a competitive game, and that if ISU got a big play or two on special teams, I could easily see them winning it. Well, they had several good special teams plays.

I was losing it when we didn't go for a chance at a field goal at the end of the 4th quarter. I knew we wouldn't, but it still pi*sed me off. And it happened again after ISU offered us a window of opportunity on the offsides penalty to turn 4th and 6 into 4th and 1, yet we didn't go for it. You can't play not to lose, especially on the road, and ESPECIALLY when it's a rivalry game and the stadium is going as nuts as JTS was.

But that didn't cost us the game. Did it cost us a CHANCE to win the game? Sure. But the play of Steele Jantz and the rest of the Cyclones is what really lost this game for the Hawks.
Kirk should check in his pants and see if his balls have dropped yet. Sorry, I couldn't resist. :unsure:

But seriously, that would **** me off as a fan. That's why, although it didn't work, I like Rhoads' risk taking like the Nebraska OT.
 

AlleyAddict

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
2,607
129
63
Ames
Thanks, all the hawk fans ive seen today went from "state sucks" to "they cant party like us" :rolleyes:
 

mg4cy

Member
Feb 5, 2007
164
4
18
Iowa
refreshing yes, but most Hawk fans will have to wait for the rest of the season for the honest assessment on who was better, so they can play the superbowl card, and what not, not the scoreboard on who was better, its the season as a whole on who is better.
 

SNEDDS3

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
4,199
697
113
Boone, IA
There is simply no excuse for the Hawks losing today. They were outplayed, and out-coached. I'll have to wait and see how the season plays out before I could make an honest assessment of which team was better, but ISU was the better team today, and it wasn't even close.

Iowa's defense was completely unable to slow down Jantz. He made play after play, and while we had a few broken coverages (the TD in the North endzone and the one that got called back spring to mind), Jantz made far more pin-point passes. It wasn't just a few lucky breaks here and there.

ISU did all they could to GIVE this game away, and they still won. Turnovers, penalties. Didn't matter, Iowa wasn't able to take advantage of the Cyclone's mistakes. ISU manhandled Iowa in the trenches on BOTH sides of the ball (which shocked me, I figured the o-lines would dominate the game for both teams).

And how's about a little love for Money Reynolds, who truly was money today?

I said a couple weeks ago that I expected a competitive game, and that if ISU got a big play or two on special teams, I could easily see them winning it. Well, they had several good special teams plays.

I was losing it when we didn't go for a chance at a field goal at the end of the 4th quarter. I knew we wouldn't, but it still pi*sed me off. And it happened again after ISU offered us a window of opportunity on the offsides penalty to turn 4th and 6 into 4th and 1, yet we didn't go for it. You can't play not to lose, especially on the road, and ESPECIALLY when it's a rivalry game and the stadium is going as nuts as JTS was.

But that didn't cost us the game. Did it cost us a CHANCE to win the game? Sure. But the play of Steele Jantz and the rest of the Cyclones is what really lost this game for the Hawks.

I respect you, you are a good poster but the first line in your post is an oxymoron.
 

DareDevil

Member
Nov 27, 2006
471
3
18
Muscatine
Nice classy post! I agree with you that Iowa should have won with all the penalies and fumbles that were given up... They just never to advantage of them, other than the first fumble.
 

tm3308

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2010
8,189
1,608
113
I respect you, you are a good poster but the first line in your post is an oxymoron.

Technically, yes it is. I just meant that in the sense that they didn't lose because "it's ISU's Super Bowl" or "we had guys injured", etc. They lost because they were outplayed, plain and simple.
 

clonefanpaul

Omnipresent Lurker
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 28, 2009
723
499
63
Milwaukee, WI
Kirk should check in his pants and see if his balls have dropped yet. Sorry, I couldn't resist. :unsure:

But seriously, that would **** me off as a fan. That's why, although it didn't work, I like Rhoads' risk taking like the Nebraska OT.

I would be even more ****** that with a minute and change on the clock at the end of the fourth he just killed the clock. Seriously, that decision was idiocy.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,829
62,389
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
For all that the Hawks lost, I wouldn't get too down on them just yet. Your QB is solid, and the O-line blocked well. McNutt is scary to play against. The D definitely didn't look like an Iowa D, but give some credit to the ISU line- we didn't have all those big boys against UNI.
 

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
43,091
36,337
113
For all that the Hawks lost, I wouldn't get too down on them just yet. Your QB is solid, and the O-line blocked well. McNutt is scary to play against. The D definitely didn't look like an Iowa D, but give some credit to the ISU line- we didn't have all those big boys against UNI.

I'd say it's way early to make that call. He really wasn't very good.
 

ISUcy08

Well-Known Member
Dec 22, 2008
1,959
60
48
I would be even more ****** that with a minute and change on the clock at the end of the fourth he just killed the clock. Seriously, that decision was idiocy.

That's the one I'm talking about. I don't blame him for talking the field goal in OT on fourth and one. Not going for the WIN with 1:20 to go and 2 timeouts, the same thing he did versus Ohio St.... stupid. Pretty sure Rhoads would have gone for it.
 

erikbj

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2006
7,508
651
113
46
hiawatha, ia
That was the worse iowa redone defense I can remember seeing. Not used to seeing norm Parker giving up 44 points......we will see if isu just gOt a lot better or this is a down year for their D.

It was a great game today, this was college football at it's finest moment! Hope the hawks turn it around.
 

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
43,091
36,337
113
Kicking the field goal looks bad but I think most every coach would do the same thing. Out of the four options that can happen after an OT field goal, only one beats you.
If you went on 4th and 1 and got stuffed, the reaction would be MUCH worse.
 

tm3308

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2010
8,189
1,608
113
Kicking the field goal looks bad but I think most every coach would do the same thing. Out of the four options that can happen after an OT field goal, only one beats you.
If you went on 4th and 1 and got stuffed, the reaction would be MUCH worse.

Like I said, under normal circumstances this is true. But it was painfully obvious to every Hawk fan (and joyfully so for ISU fans) that the Hawks were not going to stop Jantz. We couldn't do it in regulation. We could do it in the first OT. We couldn't do it in the second OT. What on EARTH made KF think they would come through in the third OT?
 

cycloneG

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2007
15,976
16,612
113
Off the grid
Like I said, under normal circumstances this is true. But it was painfully obvious to every Hawk fan (and joyfully so for ISU fans) that the Hawks were not going to stop Jantz. We couldn't do it in regulation. We could do it in the first OT. We couldn't do it in the second OT. What on EARTH made KF think they would come through in the third OT?

Agreed. ISU's last punt was with 12:00 minutes left in the 2nd quarter.