JoePa Fired/What is happening at Penn State?!?!

UNIGuy4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 11, 2009
9,410
287
113
No, he admitted to hearing an allegation, which he reported immediately. We have no idea what he was told about a possible investigation. We have no idea what other actions he may have taken or information he was privy to that his lawyer is telling him not speak about publicly at this time. There is a big difference between witnessing a rape (I think most of us agree that the GA should have intervened or called the police immediately) and hearing an allegation from one subordinate about another.

Like I said, it looks terrible, but he did fulfill his bare minimum legal obligation and the investigators don't seem to believe that he was actively covering it up like some of the other school officials seem to have been. I think, quite frankly, that Penn State and the investigators/prosecutors have bigger fish to fry than Joe Paterno at the moment. Do I think they should and will take a long at him eventually? Absolutely. I'm just saying that he's probably like the third priority at best of people who should be dealt with after Sandusky and the last person in the chain of people who were told and just sat on it.

Tell that to the 21 year old that was raped. He turned a blind eye to all of this. Hell Paterno even allowed him on campus AND allowed him to bring little boys to practice as late as 2007. Sorry but get Paterno out, he knew everything, I can about guarantee that.
 

CoachBob

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 23, 2009
150
25
28
Tell that to the 21 year old that was raped. He turned a blind eye to all of this. Hell Paterno even allowed him on campus AND allowed him to bring little boys to practice as late as 2007. Sorry but get Paterno out, he knew everything, I can about guarantee that.


Do you mean the coed in Iowa City and the Head Coach did not go to authorities right away as I remember when allegations were leveled. Maybe I am wrong on that but didn't Kirky go through the local chain of command and not the police.
 

MNCyGuy

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2009
11,644
551
83
Des Moines
Tell that to the 21 year old that was raped. He turned a blind eye to all of this. Hell Paterno even allowed him on campus AND allowed him to bring little boys to practice as late as 2007. Sorry but get Paterno out, he knew everything, I can about guarantee that.

Innocent until proven guilty. In my mind there are only two for-sure guilty people right now: Sandusky and the highest ranking official that knew about this and did not investigate or contact authorities. There are probably more people who are guilty, but we do not know that for sure. We do not know the extent to which other people were lied to. It is still possible (though admittedly unlikely) that Paterno was told there was an investigation and that Sandusky was cleared. I've got to have faith that if he was culpable in anyway it will come to light eventually, but until that time you've got to let the process work and you can't start punishing people for crimes that you can't prove they commited yet. Unless you are working for the state of Pennsylvania on this investigation and are breaking all sorts of laws by talking about it publicly, you cannot guarantee he knew anything. You think, you suspect, but you can't prove. None of us can. That is why he hasn't been fired yet.
 

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,536
66,606
113
Colorado
Completely agree that the right thing for the GA to do was to call the cops or intervene.

But try to put yourself in his shoes for a minute. I can't speak for anyone else, but what he witnessed, something that horrific, is one of the LAST things I expect to see when I'm working. It's easy for me to say sitting at my computer that I would have tried to beat the guy up. But I have never seen a little boy being raped before; I'm sure I would have been in quite a bit of shock. I have to think this is what happened with the GA; he was so caught off guard and shocked he couldn't process what to do right away. Then he went home, collected himself and proceeded to report it. This is where JoePa and the other administrators come into play. The only thing I fault the GA for is not following up after the first time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclone13

UNIGuy4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 11, 2009
9,410
287
113
Innocent until proven guilty. In my mind there are only two for-sure guilty people right now: Sandusky and the highest ranking official that knew about this and did not investigate or contact authorities. There are probably more people who are guilty, but we do not know that for sure. We do not know the extent to which other people were lied to. It is still possible (though admittedly unlikely) that Paterno was told there was an investigation and that Sandusky was cleared. I've got to have faith that if he was culpable in anyway it will come to light eventually, but until that time you've got to let the process work and you can't start punishing people for crimes that you can't prove they commited yet. Unless you are working for the state of Pennsylvania on this investigation and are breaking all sorts of laws by talking about it publicly, you cannot guarantee he knew anything. You think, you suspect, but you can't prove. None of us can. That is why he hasn't been fired yet.
Are you not guilty if you confess that you knew about it?
 

mustangcy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,918
1,021
113
Bloomfield
Innocent until proven guilty. In my mind there are only two for-sure guilty people right now: Sandusky and the highest ranking official that knew about this and did not investigate or contact authorities. There are probably more people who are guilty, but we do not know that for sure. We do not know the extent to which other people were lied to. It is still possible (though admittedly unlikely) that Paterno was told there was an investigation and that Sandusky was cleared. I've got to have faith that if he was culpable in anyway it will come to light eventually, but until that time you've got to let the process work and you can't start punishing people for crimes that you can't prove they commited yet. Unless you are working for the state of Pennsylvania on this investigation and are breaking all sorts of laws by talking about it publicly, you cannot guarantee he knew anything. You think, you suspect, but you can't prove. None of us can. That is why he hasn't been fired yet.


Dude, just stop. Your making an fool of yourself. Paterno knew about the rape and not only did not report it to the police but kept the man on campus for years after the fact..because he knew how damaging it would all be if it got out. Joe Paterno is scum..pure and simple. Evil really.
 

UNIGuy4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 11, 2009
9,410
287
113
Do you mean the coed in Iowa City and the Head Coach did not go to authorities right away as I remember when allegations were leveled. Maybe I am wrong on that but didn't Kirky go through the local chain of command and not the police.
You are comparing the rhabdo issue to child rape? Please tell me you aren't.
 

MLawrence

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2010
11,954
4,898
113
35
Probably to no one's surprise, but PSU canceled Joe Paterno's weekly press conference today.
 
Last edited:

cycloneworld

Facebook Knows All
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2006
30,187
22,533
113
Urbandale, IA
On what grounds? Sure his whole story right now is icky at best, but the authorities have straight up said that he is not a target for their investigation. At this point, if he knows that something might come out, maybe he'll decide to step down on his own, but the investigators are making it sound like they don't think he did do anything legally wrong.

If Larry Eustachy can be fired for drinking with college kids (ie. didn't do anything legally wrong), surely Penn State has grounds to fire or place Paterno on leave for severly botching child rape allegations, right?
 

weR138

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2008
12,187
5,138
113
Probably to no one's surprise, but Joe Paterno canceled his weekly press conference today.

I am a bit surprised. He's not a target of investigators after all. Innocent until proven guilty, right? What's JP got to worry about?
 

weR138

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2008
12,187
5,138
113
If Larry Eustachy can be fired for drinking with college kids (ie. didn't do anything legally wrong), surely Penn State has grounds to fire or place Paterno on leave for severly botching child rape allegations, right?

Yes, but it's not JP's job to investigate allegations. And why care when you can pass the buck. It's not Joe's fault that eight kids were raped. It's the rapists fault, right?
 

MNCyGuy

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2009
11,644
551
83
Des Moines
If Larry Eustachy can be fired for drinking with college kids (ie. didn't do anything legally wrong), surely Penn State has grounds to fire or place Paterno on leave for severly botching child rape allegations, right?

Honestly, I think it's coming in some way, shape, or form. But **** this whole thing became public what, 4 days ago? That's all I'm saying.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,611
12,054
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
In a public setting, yes. But let's be realistic: what will you do if you are the only witness and the rapist is an extremely powerful person ?

I am not saying that doing nothing is the right thing: it's definitely wrong. But we know that things don't operate in "ideal" situation.

First of all, there is no way in hell I would just try and brush it off as no big deal and walk away. I would make sure what was happening was immediately stopped, and do whatever it took to make sure it was stopped. I would than do all that I could to make sure it never happened again. I could care less who the person was, or how powerful that person was. It could be the person I respect most in life. There is a very definitive line when it comes to this stuff, and its very obvious when that line has been crossed. No holds bared once it has been crossed.
 

cyclone13

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2009
3,335
1,220
113
First of all, there is no way in hell I would just try and brush it off as no big deal and walk away. I would make sure what was happening was immediately stopped, and do whatever it took to make sure it was stopped. I would than do all that I could to make sure it never happened again. I could care less who the person was, or how powerful that person was. It could be the person I respect most in life. There is a very definitive line when it comes to this stuff, and its very obvious when that line has been crossed. No holds bared once it has been crossed.

I agree. I only try to speculate what might cross their mind at their times: at times people choose to do "what's best" instead of "what's right". We won't know what these people (GA, Janitor) thought: whether they were too upset, shocked, etc or whether they thought about different things that cloud their "right" with the "best"
I'm probably a pessimistic person, seeing so many wrong things in the society.
 

chadm

Giving it a go
Apr 11, 2006
15,418
1,333
113
Midwest
Does Pennslyvania have mandatory reporting similiar to the state of Iowa? Isn't a GA in the state of Iowa being a state employee required to report this?

Currently I put more blame on the GA than I do on JoePA.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,895
25,033
113
Do you mean the coed in Iowa City and the Head Coach did not go to authorities right away as I remember when allegations were leveled. Maybe I am wrong on that but didn't Kirky go through the local chain of command and not the police.
You are comparing the rhabdo issue to child rape? Please tell me you aren't.

I believe this was in reference to the satterfield and everson rape incident. While I do not consider the crime to be in the same ballpark, the decision to keep the investigation 'in-house' is equally disturbing.