That along with putting our undersized bigs in foul trouble pretty much every game.
How many times in those games did our undersized bigs give up ill advised fouls 90 to 30 feet away from the basket that contributed to that foul trouble? I can remember quite a few.
Yes we have 3 scholarship for the class of 2013. Clay Custer has already filled 1 of the 3. So we have 2 more to fulfill. If Amardi gets granted a 6th year of eligibility he might also fill another 1 of the 3, which would leave us with 1 remaining scholarship to fulfill for the 2014 class.
Here are Rosters and Depth charts IMO for the next two seasons:
Completely agree.We did not have any bigs per se, but we did had a 6'5 guard that weighed 230 and a 6'7 long athletic wing that somewhat compensated for lack of size in the post. When looking at 2014, we don't have the big guard, and we do not have the long athletic wing. We have Hogue, but he is not as long as Clyburn. Size could be a serious problem in 2014. Actually 2013 too if Armandi is not a serviceable big in the 12 or if Gibson doesn't get it together.
Completely agree.
That's why I was saying Hogue HAS to start or we will get crushed on rebounds and defense due to lack of size.
Imo, if Hogue plays more than 10 minutes a game we are in trouble. I expect to see more of Ejim, Geroges, and Amardi on the floor at the same time than Hogue at the three.Completely agree.
That's why I was saying Hogue HAS to start or we will get crushed on rebounds and defense due to lack of size.
Size doesn't determine how good a rebounder is. It certainly helps but Ejim was a beast throughout the big 12 season and he's listed at 6'6". Rebounding requires getting positioning more than just being tall at this level I would say.
Size doesn't determine how good a rebounder is. It certainly helps but Ejim was a beast throughout the big 12 season and he's listed at 6'6". Rebounding requires getting positioning more than just being tall at this level I would say.
Imo, if Hogue plays more than 10 minutes a game we are in trouble. I expect to see more of Ejim, Geroges, and Amardi on the floor at the same time than Hogue at the three.
Based on tapes of his IHCC games, he is like Babb, except with less size, handle, shooting, defense, and effort. He does have a better vertical.Based on what? Hogue is the 2nd or 3rd best player on his Juco team. Hogue will log 25+ minutes every game due to his rebounding, defense & driving ability. He may not be a lights out shooter, but if we can't penetrate on offense, out perimeter game is useless.
Based on tapes of his IHCC games, he is like Babb, except with less size, handle, shooting, defense, and effort. He does have a better vertical.
If our perimeter game is useless without penetration, why would you expect someone like Hogue to play much?
Expect a lot of three guard line-ups. Better +/-.
As for your concerns with big man, the defense and rebound problems were more team and guard caused than due to Ejim and Georges giving up a few inches.
I wouldn't rule out Hogue starting at the 3, or even SDW... but I also wouldn't rule out Gibson or Amardi at the 5 then Ejim at 3. This lineup can go several different ways, and Fred will put his best guys out there regardless of size.
Or he's damn good and he plays more.Imo, if Hogue plays more than 10 minutes a game we are in trouble. I expect to see more of Ejim, Geroges, and Amardi on the floor at the same time than Hogue at the three.