I'd worry at Mizzou. Who would you work for, a president yet to be named or some radical willing to fast to get rid of you?
As if the economics of the coaching profession are relateable to other professions.
Pay market rate or expect subpar results. It's a choice.
Most professions aren't fueled by inflated TV money.
Or pay market rates and still get subpar results.
Or pay market rates and still get subpar results.
when have we paid market rates? A mid-range big 12 coaching salary would be about 3-3.5 million this year.
I mean look at the numbers. If you're looking to pay 1.5 million for a coach youre not even trying at this point. As a P5 team, we should probably be at least willing to pay a mid-range pay.
http://www.coacheshotseat.com/SalariesContracts.htm
Don't understand why people think you need to mortgage the athletic department to hire a coach. Why does a starting salary have to be in the 2 - 3 mil range. What happened to a fair starting salary and you get compensated for your production and longevity? That's the way it works in most professions.
It's tough, you don't want to put all your cards on the table. What if we came at him with 2.5 and JP thought it was all we could spend, and he asks for 3? I would hope we put something in the 1.75 range (over a million dollar raise) and then if he asked for more, we put it in incentives for winning. Heck, give him 1.75 with .25/win over 6.
when have we paid market rates? A mid-range big 12 coaching salary would be about 3-3.5 million this year.
I mean look at the numbers. If you're looking to pay 1.5 million for a coach youre not even trying at this point. As a P5 team, we should probably be at least willing to pay a mid-range pay.
http://www.coacheshotseat.com/SalariesContracts.htm
Yes - my point is we could pay 3 - 3.5 mil and still not get better results.
Yes - my point is we could pay 3 - 3.5 mil and still not get better results.
Where exactly are you reading that the initial offer was $1.5 million?
Yes - my point is we could pay 3 - 3.5 mil and still not get better results.
Terrible hire (if true).
Terrible hire (if true).
Terrible hire (if true).
So your point is "let's keep paying for 'bottom-of-the-barrel' coaches and hope it goes better for us this time?"
I believe Einstein defined that as "Insanity".
It's common sense, you don't over pay just for the sake of overpaying. You offer them a fair price that they will accept. A 1-2 million dollar raise a year is pretty fair. Then if/when he starts winning, you renegotiate and he gets more. It's not like we are hiring Nick Saban or another elite coach deserving of a large contract at this point in time.