Never cared for his goatee anyway but he just went on a HUGE rant about how not having a Conf. Championship game is a GIGANTIC advantage.
See 2015 CFP there Marky...
![]()
Remember back in the day when the Big 12 had a championship game and the Big 10 and Pac 10 didn't and we had the BCS?
You could be a 1 loss team, make the conference championship, lose and get knocked out of a BSC game because you had 2 losses.
Or in the big 10 in 2002 when Ohio State played for the BCS title and Iowa gets thumped by USC in the orange bowl.
They never played each other in the regular season and had no championship game, so they put 2 into BCS games.
It was an advantage not to have a championship game. No one complained about it then. Fast forward to today, the big 12 is the only conference without a game and it's a big deal to everyone.
Think if we didn't have the playoff.
Iowa vs Clemson for the title. It could still end up that way but at least now they have to play someone to get there.
I watched their in depth analysis and they manage to avoid the only relevant question.
Assuming 3 of 4 spots are set: OU, Alabama and the BIG winner.
Real question is does a 1 loss ACC Champ UNC earn a bid over 2 loss Pac 12 champ or 1 loss Ohio St?
Gary Danielson is just as bad too. What a dinosaur. He should watch games with Brady Hoke and talk about 32 crossbucks.
Wtf is a crossbuck?
No, playing the 8 worst teams in the Big Ten conference is a HUGE advantage.Never cared for his goatee anyway but he just went on a HUGE rant about how not having a Conf. Championship game is a GIGANTIC advantage.
See 2015 CFP there Marky...
![]()
What about when ksu crushed OU in the b12 title game, and OU still went on to play USC in the national title?