It seemed to be a determining factor in the outcome. The foul call being when he dove for the ball and undercut the Nova player. Foul or not?
So, was the foul call on Ku's guard correct or not ...
- Thread starter surly
- Start date
The refs claimed that Kansas had control of the ball throughout the sequence, and thus, it was a player control foul, and they went to reply to confirm it.
Wasn't how I saw it at all...
Wasn't how I saw it at all...
If they wouldn't have called the foul they would've probably called Graham for travelling so I don't think it makes much of a difference.
Watching I was thinking either traveling or tripping with traveling being the likely call and then they go with player control on Kansas. Sometimes I think they are just spitballing some of these calls when the pressure is on.
Still think it's a bad call but with the same outcome, ball out of bounds to other team.
Still think it's a bad call but with the same outcome, ball out of bounds to other team.
yes it was a foul. You dive into a player and undercut him, it is a foul. How hard is that to understand?
Definitely not traveling and also not a foul, loose ball contact between two players, should have let them play on.
Rule book being misinterpreted by many people on the internet. It is not what the rule book says. Rule book covers incidental contact like a person going into a pile for the ball. When a player undercuts another player, that is not incidental and is a foul.
My sympathy for Kansas only goes so far, since they've had so many calls go their way throughout the years, but I felt it was a pretty bad call against them for once.
