Lanning

im4cyclones

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2010
3,937
671
113
Ames, IA
He's not very good.
If your expectations were 450+ yards passing, that would be too much.
If your expectations were to manage the game, than that shouldn't have been too high.

Problem is that he's Ankeny tough, but not very good.

Ankeny tough? I hope that is sarcasm.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: The_Gent

isu81

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2013
2,430
1,673
113
He's the next in a long line of promising qbs we've had that will end up getting benched. Jantz, Barnett, Richardson, Rohach, and now Lanning.
He was never a promising QB. I've watched him since he was in middle school. There's a reason the other teams that offered him did so at other positions.
 

jkclone

Well-Known Member
Bookie
Jan 21, 2013
5,834
2,360
83
Urbandale
I think tonight showed that he doesn't have it mentally to be the QB. He made some great throws but also some of the most boneheaded plays too.

The last interception sealed it for me. There is absolutely no excuse for that one.
 

Rabbuk

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2011
56,961
46,117
113
He was never a promising QB. I've watched him since he was in middle school. There's a reason the other teams that offered him did so at other positions.
Ya I think Rhoads planned on recruiting over him, but it never actually happened.
 

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
33,048
29,302
113
Lanning was really bad tonight. I'm sure he'll start against Iowa, but I would think Campbell will have to have a very short leash on him in that game.

That safety was just a horrific play by Lanning. He made a couple decent deep throws, but that was about it. His read option plays were not even good. He usually made the wrong read and handed it off when he should have kept it and vice versa.

He wasn't the only problem, we got destroyed in the trenches on both sides of the ball too. That never helps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: khardbored

MayorsCabinet

Member
Dec 5, 2013
58
62
18
People on here make me laugh... last year you're all calling for Joel to play over Sam and now looky here, one game in and he's awful and shouldn't be on the field.

The backup QB is always the most popular guy on the team for you guys. Get a hold of yourselves and give this 21 year old kid, learning his 4th (!!!) offense in 4 years, a damn chance.
 

jkclone

Well-Known Member
Bookie
Jan 21, 2013
5,834
2,360
83
Urbandale
People on here make me laugh... last year you're all calling for Joel to play over Sam and now looky here, one game in and he's awful and shouldn't be on the field.

The backup QB is always the most popular guy on the team for you guys. Get a hold of yourselves and give this 21 year old kid, learning his 4th (!!!) offense in 4 years, a damn chance.
I don't know if the backup can do better but I do know that Lanning made mistakes that were inexcusable for freshmen. It was awful.
 

MayorsCabinet

Member
Dec 5, 2013
58
62
18
I don't know if the backup can do better but I do know that Lanning made mistakes that were inexcusable for freshmen. It was awful.

Fumbled snap, easy fix.
Safety - OLine couldn't block anyone.
Miscommunication with Trevor Ryen on the first INT, easy fix.
Final INT was bad but it gets hectic during desperation time.

So overall, I would say the last INT was the only "inexcusable" turnover. Before the final 2 drives, he was 17-25 for 235 yards and 3 TDs. Don't forget the first 3 1/2 quarters when judging someones performance.
 

Cloneman89

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2014
532
352
63
Terrible - I was a JL fan but that was pathetic. No running game made things even worse - he is not a passing qb and it showed. Team was bad - inept - whatever you want to call it - this staff is in over their heads and have zero clue. TO at half that takes 3 off board and puts up 7. 12 men on field penalty - screen passes to nowhere. Same old BS - thought Mangino was calling plays again.
 

BBHMagic

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2009
4,370
1,379
113
The QB is the obvious position to pin things on when things go bad, but it is truly lazy in this case. There were loads of things that were pathetic in this game and to act as if Lanning was the difference is shear nonsense. The last interception was awful but the first one wasn't on him and neither was the fumbled snap. On the safety, what the hell was he supposed to do when he was instantly getting tackled from his blind side right when he got the snap? Not to mention he had some fantastic throws that we haven't seen made in years.

Was Lanning an asset today. Probably not, but he wasn't anywhere near the liability people are making him out to. Yes there are reasons we lost. Don't take the easy way out and pin it all on the QB.
 

jkclone

Well-Known Member
Bookie
Jan 21, 2013
5,834
2,360
83
Urbandale
Fumbled snap, easy fix.
Safety - OLine couldn't block anyone.
Miscommunication with Trevor Ryen on the first INT, easy fix.
Final INT was bad but it gets hectic during desperation time.

So overall, I would say the last INT was the only "inexcusable" turnover. Before the final 2 drives, he was 17-25 for 235 yards and 3 TDs. Don't forget the first 3 1/2 quarters when judging someones performance.
The fumble is inexcusable. Easy fix but it shouldn't need to be fixed. The safety wasn't really an issue. For the first interception I don't know which one was right but you can't have that so whichever one needs to figure it out. Plus I thought it was Lazard. The last interception was just absolutely inexcusable. That's the one that really did it for me. The inability to know what to do there was just awful.

Then he all around just didn't play that great. He had some nice throws but there wasn't anything special. I think that was more the receivers.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron