They care about numbers.
And if the reports and rumors are true, ESPN doesn't seem to care too much for any of the expansion candidates' numbers...
They care about numbers.
Adding a school that is adding 60,000 to its alumni base every year sure is desperation.
ESPN acts in their own best interest. Not the big 12's. ESPN would be fine with the big 12 disappearing in 10 years.
Adding a school that is adding 60,000 to its alumni base every year sure is desperation.
I think a school like UCF would be beneficial to the conference in the middle to long term. The City and its surrounding suburbs, according to Wikipedia have a population of nearly 3 million people, putting them 17th in the nation in this category. That's a decent size market, with no NFL team. Additionally, I think TV contracts in the future as others will say, will be dependent on how many people watch, which means fan base will be important. I think it is in the best interest for conferences to run their own production studio's as the money in advertising for these games is substantial. More people watching your game, the more advertsiers are willing to pay.
The problem is that when the sports media talks about teams to add, they are solely only concerned about the win/loss record of a team and the match ups that will create. The BIG 12 espn blog has a running article that ranks the expansion teams every week, from reading it, they are only taking in to account the teams win/loss record at that point in time.
UCF, USF, Cincy, Houston aren't joining another P5 conference before 2023ish. The ACC, SEC aren't waiting in the wings to add those schools. The Big12's best move at this point is patience and see what the TV rights marketplace looks like around 2022 (before the next round of BIG 10 rights negotiation). IMO a Big12//Pac12 merger makes great sense.
.
"Bring back divisions" is kind of a misnomer because nothing indicates that the Big 12 will ditch the 9 game conference schedule. But I am all aboard getting more money for changing literally nothing else, not adding programs that would water down the conference, and - looking ahead - not promoting Group of 5 programs to the Power 5 level for when/if the Big 12 collapses and Iowa State is looking for a P5 home.
No. First off. If you have a d
No. First off. If you have a freeking direction in your schools name you don't belong in a power conference. Sorry. Second. Do you really think they will pull from UF, FSU or Miami? Third. Does the BigXII really want another WVU island? Stop with the UCF garbage already. Holy ****.
No. First off. If you have a d
No. First off. If you have a freeking direction in your schools name you don't belong in a power conference. Sorry. Second. Do you really think they will pull from UF, FSU or Miami? Third. Does the BigXII really want another WVU island? Stop with the UCF garbage already. Holy ****.
Big 12 has to play round robin to have championship unless they expand to 12 or more. That was the caveat with allowing the smaller sized conference a championship game. Having said that, the conference is still considering divisions in the round robin format.
So Southern California doesn't belong in a P5 conference. Good to know...
OR ESPN promoted fear Big 12 would crash thus Nebbie, Mizzou and A&M panicked and left.Yea this is entirely untrue..It is Fox and ESPN that saved the Big 12 last go around..Now if the big 12 doesn't have Tx and OU then yea..but ESPN and Fox would lose money by not having a major conf in the middle of America..if it goes to P4 that's 20% less content available. There are only so many hours in the day to show games. Fox owns Tier 1 rights so it is more Fox than ESPN. I find it laughable all these fans that think adding say BYU or UConn or Cinnci would be worthless to the conf..Rutgers anyone? The big 12 would get 2-3 times the revenue from BYU or Uconn than Rutgers. Uconn basketball alone would.
WTS...if MOnday comes and there won't be an extension of the GOR then I sure hope JP and Leath spend the next 5-6 years begging the BIG or PAC..
I expect cable and tv to offer less money as fewer eyeballs are trending' next timeTo me, adding teams is short-sighted. You are getting $25mil for a few years, but it is only going to go down at the next round of TV negotiations. Getting less money per team will push OU out in 2025. UT will try to keep it together until the LHN deal is done. At that point, they'll either go independent or have their pick of conference options.
BYU & Houston WOULD NOT dilute the league. They'd probably strengthen it. The networks would have you believe otherwise to justify fighting a contractually obligated pro rata clause. Worrying about future negotiations is short sided considering how the media landscape is changing.
...
Even a diluted Big 12 is better than the AAC or Mountain West. Give me expansion or give me death.
Do you really think this league is more likely to survive by adding two of the teams available than they are with 10? Cause I don't.
Personally, I really think that if anything happens at all the most likely scenario is that come 2024/2025 the PAC12 and Big12 merge and drop WVU to the ACC and OU/OSU to the SEC and maybe KU to the Big10.
But to me the most important thing will be whether we have a 4 team or 8 team playoff come 2024.
I think a school like UCF would be beneficial to the conference in the middle to long term. T
.