9-9 is not safe, unless you're OK flirting with First Four and can withstand possible bid-stealing. If the two wins are Baylor and at WVa, it might work, but that means at least another sub-50 loss (Tech).
2 wins and we might be in, but sweating on Selection Sunday. Like Royce White, I don't like to sweat.
17-15 = NIT road game
I thought the same thing.I can definitely understand that thinking. For instance I don't believe Nebraska is a blueblood football school because they haven't had huge success since the early 2000's. Indiana might be in the same boat as Nebby but in the basketball scene.
In the end I would still consider them to be a blueblood. They still have quite a bit of prestige and being the premier program of the basketball state helps. Doesn't hurt having 5 national titles and 8 FFs too.
Seriously have some of you even looked at the other teams? I just don't see these other teams that are somehow going to take these spots.9-9 is not safe, unless you're OK flirting with First Four and can withstand possible bid-stealing. If the two wins are Baylor and at WVa, it might work, but that means at least another sub-50 loss (Tech).
Syracuse missed a big opportunity at home vs. UL. SU beginning to run out of opportunities. Still has Duke at home, GT twice, at Louisville. Has some good wins, but resume overall is weak and RPI in the 70s. And, best road win is at Clemson.
I would lose no sleep if Syracuse missed the field. It'd be typical if Orange barely gets to 7th or 8th in ACC, surges in the conference tournament and got the auto-bid. Sooo Boeheim.
I cant take this seriously until they move Clemson off the page. They have 9 conference losses already for **** sake. I dont care how close they were against a few good teams, those losses count just the same.
While I don't disagree that their might be some tense moments (the bubble is always moving), I just look at how they would get to 9-9.
If they only win 2 home games they are at worst adding wins over RPI 28 and 35 (granted losing at Tech would not be a good look at 95). If they only beat the 2 worst RPI teams they would be 5-4 on the road (and shockingly in this scenario 4-5 at home) with another Top 50 road win which would give them 3.
None of that might be enough to get them better than a low 10 but I just don't see a 9-9 Big XII team getting left out. Especially when you see some of the sub .500 trash currently sitting on that bubble.
Having said that I would prefer to not find out what happens to 9-9 teams and would much rather they just go 6-0 and grab a 5 or 6 seed.
9-9 is not safe, unless you're OK flirting with First Four and can withstand possible bid-stealing. If the two wins are Baylor and at WVa, it might work, but that means at least another sub-50 loss (Tech).
RPI hates us this year, that home slate was horrific:
314 Savannah St.
169 Mt. St. Mary's
294 The Citadel
184 Omaha
337 Miss. Valley St.
Throw in neutral:
282 Drake
While I don't disagree that their might be some tense moments (the bubble is always moving), I just look at how they would get to 9-9.
If they only win 2 home games they are at worst adding wins over RPI 28 and 35 (granted losing at Tech would not be a good look at 95). If they only beat the 2 worst RPI teams they would be 5-4 on the road (and shockingly in this scenario 4-5 at home) with another Top 50 road win which would give them 3.
None of that might be enough to get them better than a low 10 but I just don't see a 9-9 Big XII team getting left out. Especially when you see some of the sub .500 trash currently sitting on that bubble.
Having said that I would prefer to not find out what happens to 9-9 teams and would much rather they just go 6-0 and grab a 5 or 6 seed.
Everything else loves us. That's a wash. Plus win AT PHOG ALLEN.
Most teams in the top 16 were slotted very close to their RPI. It's still going to be a big factor this year.