SpaceX Falcon Heavy

mywayorcyway

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2012
2,330
2,355
113
Phoenix
I want to see that car's paint job and upholstery in 60 days. Without substantial UV stabilizers the sun will destroy every petroleum-based component (rubber/plastic) and fade the paint very quickly. In fact, if there's any tension on those seat belts at all the UV damage may chew through those and release the spaceman(nequin) before any other damage shows up.

Well you're just a ray of sunshine, aren't you? heh heh



Seriously, though - I'm interested in some of those same things. I'm guessing the folks at SpaceX are as well.
 

CTTB78

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2006
9,540
4,518
113
The stuff this company has done in such a short time is truly remarkable. How these advancements can be used, and how quick they can be used, will be interesting to keep an eye on.

Booster landings were impressive.
Was the funding all Musk and private investors?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: srjclone

SpokaneCY

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
13,294
8,489
113
Spokane, WA
The stuff this company has done in such a short time is truly remarkable. How these advancements can be used, and how quick they can be used, will be interesting to keep an eye on.

Love this company. The costs of launch are ridiculously cheaper than any other outfit but still some congress members don't want to back them.
 

CyArob

Why are you the way that you are?
Apr 22, 2011
32,496
13,442
113
MN

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,682
80,074
113
DSM
All of this crazy stuff being done via private equity and we can’t even get a viable high speed rail network going in this country. I want to go from DSM to Denver in 2 1/2 hours.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,934
14,050
113
All of this crazy stuff being done via private equity and we can’t even get a viable high speed rail network going in this country. I want to go from DSM to Denver in 2 1/2 hours.

If high speed rail could be profitable, private equity would fund it. Apparently no one believes there is enough demand at a profitable price.

And you can get from DSM to Denver in 2.5 hours. Airplanes.
 

MNCYWX

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2010
2,306
985
113
WDM
You could tell in the live feed from the broadcasters that something was wrong with the main booster. They started talking about it as if it was a successful landing and then abruptly stopped before letting out a series of confused mumblings. Never revisited it.

Not only did the main booster miss the ship... it missed the ship by 20 to 30 feet, crashing into the ocean at 300 mph. That's a pretty big oops and setback in my opinion.

Evidently, it ran out of propellant based on the reports I've seen.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: isufbcurt

NWICY

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2012
35,660
31,804
113
You could tell in the live feed from the broadcasters that something was wrong with the main booster. They started talking about it as if it was a successful landing and then abruptly stopped before letting out a series of confused mumblings. Never revisited it.

Not only did the main booster miss the ship... it missed the ship by 20 to 30 feet, crashing into the ocean at 300 mph. That's a pretty big oops and setback in my opinion.

Evidently, it ran out of propellant based on the reports I've seen.

Well by missing the landing pad at least that's probably reusable, crashing into a 300mph probably wouldn't have much salvage left.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,854
62,430
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
You could tell in the live feed from the broadcasters that something was wrong with the main booster. They started talking about it as if it was a successful landing and then abruptly stopped before letting out a series of confused mumblings. Never revisited it.

Not only did the main booster miss the ship... it missed the ship by 20 to 30 feet, crashing into the ocean at 300 mph. That's a pretty big oops and setback in my opinion.

Evidently, it ran out of propellant based on the reports I've seen.

Missing by 20-30' vs boosters that had to hit the water on purpose is not a set back IMO. Landing 2 of 3 boosters is remarkable, especially given the fact that the capsule was successfully put into space.
 

SpokaneCY

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
13,294
8,489
113
Spokane, WA
Missing by 20-30' vs boosters that had to hit the water on purpose is not a set back IMO. Landing 2 of 3 boosters is remarkable, especially given the fact that the capsule was successfully put into space.

Simply remarkable. The cost of launch - simply remarkable. The speed that they test and develop - simply remarkable. This is America's pioneer spirit on full friggin' display.

I'll try and find a link, but was a great piece comparing a typical US launch vehicle contract with how Musk did it. It's such a no-brainer and you engineers would geek out on the nimbleness.
 

Cybyassociation

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2008
9,055
3,826
113
I'm so confused. Is the Tesla on top of something heading to Mars? Is the Tesla floating all by itself? Is anything going to Mars?