Great read! They seem to be pretty good again this year ranked #3 in fcs. Is there a ranking system that includes both fcs and fbs? I read somewhere that South Dakota State would have finished ranked in the 60’s last year overall. That is a bowl quality team if so.
I don't think the game will be that close.
I have faith in Campbell and the team to take care of business, but I’ve seen a lot of this. I think you guys are in for a rude awakening if you think we’re going to blow them out.
I predict it will be a little too close for comfort throughout the first half. Then we put them away late. Thinking. 31-17 or something like that. Most likely a scenario where the final score isn’t an indication of how the game went.
I’d love to be wrong and see a blowout, but I’m just snake bitten by plenty of first games that we’ve looked rusty in.
If we are sloppy and commit turnovers, this will be a tough game. I doubt SDSU will beat themselves. Hoping our improved DL will wreak havoc, and OL take control and give a good balance between Montgomery and shots downfield.
Good article; it reads that they seem to have a winning Swag mentality. Combined with a senior QB and good running backs; we'll need our D-line to have a good game. No turnovers on O...Keep in mind they lost their Bowl Game to James Madison - big time; and that was with some good senior talent.
"....
their run of six straight playoff appearances has clearly earned them national respect. SDSU opens the season ranked 3rd in the Top 25 poll. Last year they began the season ranked 6th.
The Jacks return the most prolific quarterback they’ve ever had in senior Taryn Christion, a stable of talented running backs, and a defense that added former Iowa Hawkeye safety Brandon Snyder to a unit ....."
Just once it would be nice to have an FCS team on the schedule that isn't a top ten national title contender. It would be a refreshing change of pace if the pessimistic fans were expecting the starters to play most of the third quarter while the optimists were expecting the 1st string to spend the 2nd half in sweats and eating hot dogs.
Seriously though, is there a reason we keep scheduling tougher fcs foes? I really don't see much benefit in doing this.
You would be shocked. What most people forget to mention is that SDSU went up against JMU in the semis and committed 10 turnovers. Obviously, 10 turnovers is an outrageous number but they were playing against a very sound and disciplined defense. I have watched SDSU a few times since I am a USD alum. This quarterback reminds me of a poor mans Kenny Hill. If ISUs dline can create some pressure, it will be a long night for the rabbits.
That's good to know. What were their turnover and penalty numbers BEFORE the semis game?
You would be shocked. What most people forget to mention is that SDSU went up against JMU in the semis and committed 10 turnovers. Obviously, 10 turnovers is an outrageous number but they were playing against a very sound and disciplined defense. I have watched SDSU a few times since I am a USD alum. This quarterback reminds me of a poor mans Kenny Hill. If ISUs dline can create some pressure, it will be a long night for the rabbits.
These games are scheduled like 6-8 years in advance. Good luck predicting who will be good/bad 6 years from now. SDSU sucked when we scheduled them. Same thing with NDSU.Just once it would be nice to have an FCS team on the schedule that isn't a top ten national title contender. It would be a refreshing change of pace if the pessimistic fans were expecting the starters to play most of the third quarter while the optimists were expecting the 1st string to spend the 2nd half in sweats and eating hot dogs.
Seriously though, is there a reason we keep scheduling tougher fcs foes? I really don't see much benefit in doing this.
These games are scheduled like 6-8 years in advance. Good luck predicting who will be good/bad 6 years from now. SDSU sucked when we scheduled them. Same thing with NDSU.