Hoiberg will attend the Baylor game (AS A FAN!)

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,435
10,160
113
41
Again you ignore the era after the big 3 left. They were bad for a while. Ainge is not considered an upper echelon gm.

Amazing you continue to misrepresent simple facts. I guess pop is not as ready for his coaching lessons you were going to provide for him.
Lol.
I sympathize that the trauma of the 80’s have made you ISU’s Don Quixote, but you may be wearing your armor a little tight, my friend.
 

cyfan92

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2011
8,228
13,100
113
Augusta National Golf Club
Ejim and Hoiberg are the foundation of the resurgence. Niang doesn't matter nearly as much without Melvin setting the stage, and in Niang's accounts, setting Niang straight in practice following a nice headlock takedown of the freshman.

I don't want to come off as bashing Melvin, because he is such a great ambassador to ISU. But Niang and Fred led the resurgence of this program. Ejim wasn't ever the best player on his own team. However, Niang was 3 out of his 4 years.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,836
62,399
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
I don't want to come off as bashing Melvin, because he is such a great ambassador to ISU. But Niang and Fred led the resurgence of this program. Ejim wasn't ever the best player on his own team. However, Niang was 3 out of his 4 years.

He wasn't the best player on his own team when he won Big 12 player of the year?
 

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,435
10,160
113
41
I don't want to come off as bashing Melvin, because he is such a great ambassador to ISU. But Niang and Fred led the resurgence of this program. Ejim wasn't ever the best player on his own team. However, Niang was 3 out of his 4 years.
How are we defining best player?
 

cyfanatic13

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2008
11,504
10,677
113
I loved Ejim. Absolutely loved him. But you're kidding yourself if you're taking him over Kane/Niang that year. Didn't Hoiberg say after the UNC game that half his plays were for Kane and half were for Niang (and had to get ride of those plays)?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: bsaltyman and flycy

SolarGarlic

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,314
9,629
113
Ejim and Hoiberg are the foundation of the resurgence. Niang doesn't matter nearly as much without Melvin setting the stage, and in Niang's accounts, setting Niang straight in practice following a nice headlock takedown of the freshman.

Ejim was there for the beginning of the resurgence, but no player is as synonymous with Hoiball and Hoiberg's era than Georges Niang. It's not close.

Niang is the last guy that needed a stage set for him.
 

EarthIsMan

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 23, 2014
643
1,154
93
Earth
JFC, first it is a Prohm vs. Hoiberg pissing match and now it is arguing Ejim's importance?

You could possibly argue Ejim was not the best player, but he was critical part of ISU MBB's resurgence and establishing a culture.

Maybe polemics is the just preferred rhetorical technique today on CF? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 

flycy

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
2,339
2,520
113
Crescent, IA
Anecdotally, the newer fans don't value Fred like the old guard. He was my favorite player (and everyone else's at that time) growing up, and I'll always think of him first as "The Mayor" on those Orr/Floyd teams. I don't think anyone hates him, but some fans think of him as the coach that left ISU for the NBA.


Over/under on ESPN camera shots of Fred during the game? It's going to be obnoxious.

Speak for yourself, Julius was my favorite, but that Freddy guy was OK too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SolarGarlic