Chill your ****, this is a notice to everyone moving forward.News flash: anyone bemoaning "call out culture" is being political too. But somehow right-wing political is ok to you.
Chill your ****, this is a notice to everyone moving forward.News flash: anyone bemoaning "call out culture" is being political too. But somehow right-wing political is ok to you.
I for one am especially glad Carson didn't go after any kittens! I mean who would post anything like that on social media? And where would someone like that get a job now that the Register has been called out.Yep, and as i mentioned earlier, certainly we'd all agree there are some things that no one would be able to look past, even if one was 16, even with apologies.
Hopefully this prevents the DMR from future attempts of cheaply profiting off the hysteria of call-out culture. They managed to mess up what should have been an easy story. But this is a place that still employs Randy.This entire situation is a debacle and there's a ton of blame to go around. The reporter should never have been hired given his history, and that's true whether he'd ever exposed Carson King's tweets or not.
But the online mob that developed in the wake of the Register story was like nothing I've ever seen, and it hasn't let up even now that the reporter lost his job. Even tonight I'm seeing tweets that essentially say, "It's a shame he got death threats, but..." People have lost their minds.
Hopefully this prevents the DMR from future attempts of cheaply profiting off the hysteria of call-out culture. They managed to mess up what should have been an easy story.
I think that kind of research is pretty important in a lot of situations. This clearly wasn’t one of those situations though, he wasn’t aspiring to some leadership position or anything like that.
He was literally not profiting at all off of this, other than publicity for his cause. There was no reason for the Register to call out the attack dogs. However - the attack dog was really sort of just doing his job, as crappy as that job is.
Well said. Just another reminder of how low the DMR has fallen in their struggle to avoid being antiquated.The tweets should never have been material to the story about a private citizen doing good, that is where this went wrong. That is on the Senior Editor...period.
The details of how this spiraled out of control are irrelevant. I would have felt a little bad for Calvin if not for his own terrible tweets. But again, that is partly on the Senior Editor for not keeping a respectable and professional staff, and for having horribly antiquated hiring practices.
The Register did not offer anything near an apology. Frankly, more words from them are not needed, and if anything they provided additional proof of how terrible the Senior Editor is at being a journalist and running a newspaper.
Get rid of Carol Hunter...or expect more of the same.
Hopefully this prevents the DMR from future attempts of cheaply profiting off the hysteria of call-out culture. They managed to mess up what should have been an easy story. But this is a place that still employs Randy.
I've also seen a lot of people in the local media comment that they are surprised they do a routine social media check for a story like this.My thing with “doing his job”, why is it necessary to go back to tweets from 2011? I totally understand going back a year or two but eight? Just stupid and makes no sense. And I know you can search for specific words tweeted by specific accounts and maybe that’s how he found them, but at that point it definitely seems like it was trying to find dirt rather than making a profile
Right they missed their mark, badly. The search doesn’t seem out of line, but the inclusion of what little they found seems forced.I think that kind of research is pretty important in a lot of situations. This clearly wasn’t one of those situations though, he wasn’t aspiring to some leadership position or anything like that.
That’s the call-out culture they jumped in bed with. It’s Iowa, it’s everywhere.They're getting death threats and hiring extra security for their offices. This is Iowa. This isn't what we are. Or at least, it didn't used to be.
My thing with “doing his job”, why is it necessary to go back to tweets from 2011? I totally understand going back a year or two but eight? Just stupid and makes no sense. And I know you can search for specific words tweeted by specific accounts and maybe that’s how he found them, but at that point it definitely seems like it was trying to find dirt rather than making a profile
Editor should be gone too. Maybe even more so. For bad business acumen, if nothing else.
I enjoy the humor in him attributing this to right-wing, anti-PC ideologues when A.) he should be blaming the generally left-leaning call-out and cancel culture that he pathetically attempted profit from, B.) he had far more non-PC, offensive tweets. If the tweet by needed to be included in his article, his tweets are grounds for dismissal
I have just as much issue on whatever senior editor ran the story.