Report: OU & Texas reach out to join SEC

whatthewhat

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 7, 2019
110
155
43
63
There is long term risk for Iowa State if they remain in the Big 12 through 2025, as per the OU and Texas letter today. This does not provide us with any stability, including economic. I still recommend kicking OU and TX out of the conference now, this week. Trade short-term spite and upheaval for the money we may or may not see a few years from now.
If it were $1,000 sure. But no way you give up the millions it is going to cost Texas and Oklahoma for causing this mess.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Statefan10

EsTasClone

New Member
Dec 10, 2015
23
6
3
And does the PAC making moves motivate the Big 10 to do anything? We’ll see
I think yes. No one wants to get caught with their pants down in this thing. PAC 12 making moves only makes others follow suit. Not to mention the B1G has a relatively new commish who many view as not up to the job.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,659
63,722
113
Not exactly sure.
I looked at the numbers slightly. As someone else mentioned, Iowa State has greatly improved our position in the last 10 years. We were #44 in AD revenue in 2019 but when you strip out state support of those schools we move up to #38 in AD revenue generation. The AD revenue was $95.4 million with ISU generating $93.4 million of that. Now that includes the approx. $40 million in conference payments which is the slice of the pie that is in jeopardy.

Very Worst case, ISU slides to an enhanced AAC level conference. The AAC may only get $10-12 million today but if the new conference includes former Big 12 teams, I would think the new contract would bump up. Still probably only $20 million or so and thus ISU takes a $20 million hit on conference payment.
IF the fan/public support remains constant that would be the only reduction, however, with a diminished public perception and visibility, the support and public sales MAY also drop some so let's ballpark another $5 million off that.

That equates ISU instead of building to $100-$105 million AD budget probably dropping back to $75-$80 million AD budget. This is better than any existing G5 conference and on par with the lowest earning schools in current P5 conferences.

People state Texas underperforms with their $200+ million budget (and they do). Iowa is over $150 million and what do they have to show for that level of spend? Iowa AD $ is #5 in B1G, is the AD performance top 5? Iowa State is #6 (out of 8 public, supposedly Baylor is more, TCU less) in Big12. I would say our AD performance is top half (probably #4-5 in all sports) so ISU is definitely getting value for the dollar.

RankSchoolConfRevenueExpensesRev Generate
50Georgia TechACC$85,802,112$96,334,831$77,544,930
47North Carolina StateACC$92,724,548$90,100,025$85,872,559
42Virginia TechACC$96,772,489$93,961,068$86,494,151
36North CarolinaACC$107,812,619$110,809,706$98,649,245
32VirginiaACC$110,219,117$112,621,238$91,789,316
22ClemsonACC$133,861,515$131,978,513$128,259,075
19LouisvilleACC$139,955,824$151,167,940$134,032,007
12Florida StateACC$152,757,883$150,147,316$137,150,864
48Kansas StateBig 12$89,919,822$83,079,244$89,919,822
45Oklahoma StateBig 12$95,335,482$95,008,483$95,247,842
44Iowa StateBig 12$95,411,884$95,315,376$93,357,570
43Texas TechBig 12$96,625,347$95,132,604$93,107,675
40West VirginiaBig 12$102,680,928$98,249,890$98,778,029
28KansasBig 12$121,553,307$108,881,800$119,807,033
8OklahomaBig 12$163,126,695$157,958,270$163,126,695
1TexasBig 12$223,879,781$204,234,897$223,879,781
39RutgersBig Ten$103,251,280$103,167,344$73,391,885
33MarylandBig Ten$108,796,303$108,785,924$83,432,588
31PurdueBig Ten$110,844,907$102,026,477$110,844,907
29IllinoisBig Ten$118,565,501$120,168,951$109,912,686
25IndianaBig Ten$127,832,628$114,822,135$124,878,123
24MinnesotaBig Ten$130,456,454$129,450,256$122,483,722
21NebraskaBig Ten$136,233,460$124,148,206$136,233,460
18Michigan StateBig Ten$140,010,865$135,655,740$139,125,175
14IowaBig Ten$151,976,026$146,282,275$151,326,026
11WisconsinBig Ten$157,660,107$154,621,828$154,631,107
6Penn StateBig Ten$164,529,326$160,369,805$164,529,326
4MichiganBig Ten$197,820,410$190,952,175$197,558,637
3Ohio StateBig Ten$210,548,239$220,572,956$210,548,239
54Washington StatePac-12$71,691,339$76,258,966$66,229,324
51Oregon StatePac-12$82,058,386$82,364,021$70,246,661
49CaliforniaPac-12$87,500,758$106,676,734$87,500,758
46ColoradoPac-12$94,935,198$98,413,284$82,652,173
41UtahPac-12$99,526,695$96,000,514$86,932,182
38ArizonaPac-12$105,091,389$100,565,835$83,205,222
35UCLAPac-12$108,412,967$127,339,042$105,835,754
27Arizona StatePac-12$121,698,840$118,404,377$102,342,706
26OregonPac-12$127,508,498$128,943,543$127,055,574
23WashingtonPac-12$133,792,677$131,317,636$129,640,713
37MissouriSEC$106,610,244$108,398,447$105,595,244
34MississippiSEC$108,442,428$113,013,400$105,347,032
30Mississippi StateSEC$112,273,809$98,832,615$112,273,809
20ArkansasSEC$137,497,788$129,620,361$137,497,788
17South CarolinaSEC$140,695,659$136,879,732$140,695,659
16TennesseeSEC$143,765,903$142,976,173$143,765,903
15KentuckySEC$150,435,842$144,886,246$150,435,842
13AuburnSEC$152,455,416$139,260,711$147,194,164
10LSUSEC$157,787,782$148,977,880$157,787,782
9FloridaSEC$159,706,937$141,829,002$157,445,164
7AlabamaSEC$164,090,889$185,317,681$161,436,338
5GeorgiaSEC$174,042,482$143,299,554$170,533,632
2Texas A&MSEC$212,748,002$169,012,456$212,748,002
One thing to remember is the media money is not all from the conference, I believe we get somewhere between 5-10 MM for radio, CTV, and other stuff. So you can subtract that from your 20 MM hit in revenue.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,878
13,962
113
It feels like a Pac 12 merger is coming with the remaining 6, 7, 8 B12 schools. But WVU is out, IMHO. Perhaps Baylor as well.

I would feel bad for WV. I really hope they can land somewhere good, like the ACC, but idk how it happens.

Baylor can suck it. Karma is a b!tch and she is a big Sun Belt fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jctisu

cydsho

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2006
4,369
5,827
113
Omaha, NE
I have no idea if it is the best long term (forever) deal but I'm leaning Super Pac12 conf. Getting away from the SEC/B10 drama sounds good. Although I just don't know how good that would be because that conference would not be in the heart of college sports. If that even exists now.
 

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
It feels like a Pac 12 merger is coming with the remaining 6, 7, 8 B12 schools. WVU is out, IMHO. Perhaps Baylor as well.

I don’t really see the value from the Pac-12’s perspective in adding more than four leftovers. If the B1G and ACC aren’t taking any (WVU excluded), then I think this is probably bad news for Baylor, TCU, and K-State.
 

SEIOWA CLONE

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2018
6,793
6,989
113
63
I am starting to think this is not going to be quick as what I once thought. I assumed that once OU and UT made it official that they were leaving the other conferences would quickly want to fill their remaining spots.
But after hearing Jami last night saying that he expects for UT and OU to fulfill their obligation to the league or buy themselves out of it, and then seeing that the GOR for the Pac 12 runs out in 2024, I am thinking this is going to take a season or two.

ISU should be fine until at least 2023 no matter what happens, even if OU and UT pay the penalty and leave, and the rates decrease we should be able to make it at least two years. That will give both the Big 10 and Pac 12 time to decide what they are doing. Are they just going to set up some type of scheduling between the two conferences or are 4 to 6 teams going to break away and join the Big 10. Until we know that, and their GOR do not run out until 2024, we are in neutral going no where.
 
Last edited:

BigJCy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
24,948
21,797
113
I am starting to think this is not going to be quick as what I once thought. I assumed that once OU and UT made it official that they were leaving the other conferences would quickly want to fill their remaining spots.
But after hearing Jami last night saying that he expects for UT and OU to fulfill their obligation to the league or buy themselves out of it, and then seeing that the GOR for the Pac 12 runs out in 2024, I am thinking this is going to take a season or two.

ISU should be fine until at least 2023 not matter what happens, even if OU and UT pay the penalty and leave, and the rates decrease we should be able to make it at least two years. That will give both the Big 10 and Pac 12 time to decide what they are doing. Are they just going to set up some type of scheduling between the two conferences or are 4 to 6 teams going to break away and join the Big 10. Until we know that, and their GOR do not run out until 2024, we are in neutral going no where.
Agree, think this is going to be a year or years type deal not a weeks or months one....unfortunately. No use getting all worried about where we are going to end up at this point. Probably going to be a fairly long process.
 

Rods79

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2006
3,546
1,238
113
Des Moines
I am starting to think this is not going to be quick as what I once thought. I assumed that once OU and UT made it official that they were leaving the other conferences would quickly want to fill their remaining spots.
But after hearing Jami last night saying that he expects for UT and OU to fulfill their obligation to the league or buy themselves out of it, and then seeing that the GOR for the Pac 12 runs out in 2024, I am thinking this is going to take a season or two.

ISU should be fine until at least 2023 not matter what happens, even if OU and UT pay the penalty and leave, and the rates decrease we should be able to make it at least two years. That will give both the Big 10 and Pac 12 time to decide what they are doing. Are they just going to set up some type of scheduling between the two conferences or are 4 to 6 teams going to break away and join the Big 10. Until we know that, and their GOR do not run out until 2024, we are in neutral going no where.

I’m just going to reiterate; the B1G and the PAC are renegotiating long-term contracts for after 2024 now, or shortly if they have any started yet. It is not like they’re going to work something out in 2023 just in time for 2024. The networks are going to plan their slates out well in advance of that. This is through this season at most, in my opinion…depending how much the legal system does or does not take it to TX/OU.
 

Dandy

Future CF Mod
Oct 11, 2012
22,127
17,364
113
Western Iowa
I think if the PAC 12 expands, the B1G does too and grabs ISU and KU.
You and I are on the same page today!

I just posted this in the In-State football thread:


In my dreams I think it will go something like:
- B1G quickly decides to stay put
- PAC has expansion plans announced
- B1G reacts and decides to expand too

Just like their COVID decision. Make quick decision, watch what others do, then react.

If the SEC and PAC get to 16 teams the B1G will want to follow suit. ACC will do the same in this scenario too.

SEC adds OU and Texas.
ACC adds WV and ??? (Cinc, UCF, Memphis)
B1G adds ISU and KU
PAC adds Ok St, K St, Tech and TCU

P4 with 16 teams each.

Baylor gets the boot to the AAC.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron