I resemble that statementLol it’s 12 dumbasses (myself included) mashing their keyboards
I resemble that statementLol it’s 12 dumbasses (myself included) mashing their keyboards
Yeah there’s no way he’s a real fan. Big time troll.Who is "we"?
I think we have a lot of fans like this. They tend to fall into one of two camps. The first are the fatalist, nutcup “we are ISU” losers. The others are the clowns that actually have some odd sense of pride over having good tailgating for a ******* football teams. These are the sit in the parking lot and drink beer and miss half of the third quarter guys.
We aren't getting added by anyone. We're taking Cinci and some other school and making the Big MAC.
Try switching hands. It might help.We aren't getting added by anyone. We're taking Cinci and some other school and making the Big MAC.
Yeah there’s no way he’s a real fan. Big time troll.
Yeah that’s such a stupid take lolBut not one single person living in Phoenix knew Iowa State was playing in the fiesta bowl, and the only reason people watched the game was because of Oregon. He knows this because he lives there.
imagine what a loser that guy has to be in real life
Hard to figure out why.The problem with 1 is that even though they don't know **** about college sports is they still know who the Hawkeyes are.
Scott Frost could use that win against Kansas.There are only two teams that would like or agree to that. Kansas and Iowa State.
I cant definitively comment, but my nephew was just choosing between ISU and Minny and the cost was basically the same per my sister.If this is true, I’d sure like to know more.
There wasn't the potential for an 8 or 12 team playoff back then.The B1G already tried competitive balance divisions and it was a disaster. They switched to geographic from Legends and Leaders.
My dad is from Mesa and got into Iowa State football when Purdy decided to go there. He was disappointed they wouldn't let fans go to the game. He wanted to see them play in person.Yeah that’s such a stupid take lol
That’s why Pods make more sense. You would play everyone in the conference at least every two years, and once at home every 4.
Plus the potential for a semi final round for the conference championship, which those two games would likely add some $$$ to the pot.
I don't think you would create a two game conf championship (at least you wouldn't have to). If you consolidate into a power division with no games against fcs, or non-power teams I guess this could happen by eliminating 1 or 2 non-conf games.
If you have 4 pods, you simply pair two pods each season. So, make it easy...
North
South
East
West
N+S play each other for two season (home and away, 7 game total each year); N teams would play two games each vs. E (home, away), S teams play 2 games each vs. W (home, away)
W+E do the same.
In year 3 the "partner: divisions change:
N+W play each other home and away. The N still plays the E but now they change to the two teams they did not play during the previous two years. S&W do the same.
In the end Every team plays each other home and away over a 4 year period and you have temporary divisions that change every two years so you can still have a championship match up between two 8 team divisions.
It makes total sense, outside of the need for certain cash cow rivalry games to be played every year to satisfy TV and fan bases.
Ideally, the best competitive situation is two divisions, weighted fairly evenly, with the top two brands in opposite divisions poised to meet in the CCG. Once teams demand a cross division rivalry game get played every year it all falls apart pretty quickly.
My dad is from Mesa and got into Iowa State football when Purdy decided to go there. He was disappointed they wouldn't let fans go to the game. He wanted to see them play in person.
You mean, he knew Iowa State was playing in the fiesta bowl?
impossible, we were told no one there cared