Chicago Bears bought Arlington Heights track only to build next to Soldier Field?

Cycsk

Year-round tailgater
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 17, 2009
28,412
17,340
113
You certainly can take public transport to any game in Chicago. But it doesn't mean it is easy or convenient at least in my mind. Getting to a Cubs game via public transport is not too bad. But leaving in the masses sucks.


Our little trick leaving Wrigley Field was to walk a few blocks north to the Irving Park/Sheridan train stop, get on going southbound, and enjoy our choice of seats while the train pulls up to the masses at Addison.
 

canker2323

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2006
1,614
378
83
47
What Cheer, IA
I’m kind of bummed the horse track is closing. I liked that place.

Wish a stadium could be built south of McCormick, where the old hospital (I think) was located. Would still be a nightmare getting in and out.
 

deadeyededric

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
15,836
13,622
113
Parts Unknown
That was only the teams who have their location branded as a major city. Include the franchises with a regional name but suburban location, and you would include…

Glendale Cardinals

Foxborogh Patriots

Plus there are teams with stadiums technically in their parent city’s limits but very much more thematically a suburban location. Examples would include KC and Houston.
The Cardinals will be out in Glendale by themselves after this season since the city kicked the Coyotes out.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: VeloClone

Rabbuk

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2011
56,961
46,117
113
I’m kind of bummed the horse track is closing. I liked that place.

Wish a stadium could be built south of McCormick, where the old hospital (I think) was located. Would still be a nightmare getting in and out.
Was it some kind of children's hospital? I think that might be gone now. But the one I'm thinking of came down in like the 80s?
 

DesertClone1

DesertClone
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 6, 2009
8,197
3,508
113
Queen Creek, AZ
Because they lose so much money at Soldier field. At the race track area they can build a casino, there own hotels, bars and resturants. Basically build their own little city and get all the money, parking, and concessions. It's really a good move for them. I am a Packers fan but I can totally understand this. It's not like Soldier Field is historic anymore.

So what they’re essentially doing is what The Packers are doing with the TitleTown District.
 

davegilbertson

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2011
1,856
1,866
113
42
My concern is KC would be going from the greatest parking lot in sports to downtown with almost no parking, correct?
Royals tailgating would become a thing of the past. I think the hope would be that it becomes more of a destination/immersive urban setting, albeit more difficult to get to. I think the proposed location would keep it from being in the heart of downtown, out skirts of the East/NE edge of downtown, so traffic may not become nearly as bad of an issue.

I'm just remembering when KCATA used to have free (or very very cheap) bus to Kauffmann Stadium and HyVee offered 5$ tickets. Then Royals had to go and get good and win a championship. :)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: deadeyededric

drmwevr08

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
7,661
3,687
113
Arizona
The Cardinals will be out in Glendale by themselves after this season since the city kicked the Coyotes out.
I was surprised for a purpose built area at how badly that place clears out after a game. It was a **** show, at least for those in the shopping area adjacent. So much for the burbs being easier access.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: deadeyededric

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,000
20,965
113
The quotes from Chicago's mayor lead me to believe they're not going to fight very hard to keep the Bears in the city. I'm sure they could find something to do with that property in that part of town that would be just as valuable, if not more so, than a stadium. Soldier Field is old and decrepit, and there's no point in keeping old things if they suck.
That's my thinking too. It's one thing when a stadium leaves a city and is in just some part of town. But that real estate has to be incredibly valuable. It would also be a difference in economic impact if it was in a smaller market, but I would think gameday economic impacts aren't that significant in the big picture in a city the size of Chicago. Plus there is probably still a fair amount of Bears spillover visitors making a weekend trip out of a game. While I love the idea of the downtown stadium, and I much prefer that type of experience. However, for larger cities with expensive real estate I have to think it's not always the best bet to have an NFL stadium taking up all that real estate.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mjdivine

Nor'MidWester

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2016
1,811
2,633
113
Seriously doubt they will tear down a recently renovated stadium to sell off the land to developers, especially park land along the lake.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,695
66,050
113
LA LA Land
Chicago should have become a 2 NFL franchise city decades ago.

The market for two teams in terms of ticket sales is drastically higher than LA.

Bears should have stayed downtown and an expansion or relocated teams should have moved to west suburbs in a new stadium before the Olympic bid got serious. Landing the spaceship on Soldier Field, not getting a second team, and not building a new indoor stadium (for Bears or 2nd team) has been a super dumb strategy. Not as dumb as privatizing parking meters for 75 years for only 2 years worth of the revenue, but still pretty dumb.

I'm not a big Bears/NFL fan the way I am Bulls/NBA/Cubs/MLB so I never went to a Bears game in 14 years living there because tickets are laughably overpriced for a team that hasn't had an offense for 30+ years straight. A second NFL team would actually help the Bears suck less.

For whatever reason Cubs/Sox/Hawks/Bulls tickets would land in my lap via friends and never a freebie or cheap Bears ticket.

I moved to LA in 2015. Tickets at Wrigley for the 2016 NLCS were starting around $1500, not the WS, just NLCS. Tickets for the same series at Dodger Stadium started at $111. That's how drastically higher sports ticket demand is in Chicago than LA. It was cheaper for a Cubs fan to buy a ticket, plane ticket and nice hotel in LA than go to the game in Wrigley.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: NWICY

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
43,088
36,334
113
Chicago’s second team was long gone before the NFL became a cultural phenomenon.

It’s leaving money on the table to not have it now.
 

mattyheiden

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2011
1,273
145
83
MN
I became a Bears fan during the Vince Evans, Walter Payton, Noah Jackson, Alan Page era.
 
Last edited:

CloneGuy8

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2017
11,856
23,228
113
40
So are they planning on building a retractable roof? I know that makes the most sense to host other events, including a super bowl. As a fan though, that would kind of suck. I love watching games played in the elements. Home games for the Bears, Packers, Bills, Steelers, Ravens, Browns, ect in the winter are fun to watch when the weather sucks (easy to say when I'm watching from my couch).
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone

JP4CY

Lord, beer me strength.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2008
74,562
95,550
113
Testifying
So are they planning on building a retractable roof? I know that makes the most sense to host other events, including a super bowl. As a fan though, that would kind of suck. I love watching games played in the elements. Home games for the Bears, Packers, Bills, Steelers, Ravens, Browns, ect in the winter are fun to watch when the weather sucks (easy to say when I'm watching from my couch).
I'd just dome it. Wouldn't it only be open for a few games?