You'd have something if you accurately knew his scheme.Nothing false about that post. Hoiberg's system needs elite offense players and he doesn't have them. The 3-pt line moved 2 ft further out a couple of years ago and that puts even more stress on his offensive scheme, which isn't novel anymore and coaches now know how to defend it better. His Nebraska team have been/are poor at rebounding, which gets exploited badly in conference play. If he can't adapt his offense to the skills of the players he has, and fix his rebounding, it will not end very well for him at NU.
His scheme of using analytics, passing, sharing the ball, and taking good looks, whether twos or threes, still results in top defense. He was elite at exploiting mismatches and realizing the elasticity of a players offensive/defensive contributions. Good now as it was then, if he has the players. Often near the top of the conference in 2P FG%. At the end of his tenure, near the top in 2P FGA even.
He's changed. It should not surprise anyone that a coach that could not tell recruits what they needed to hear for over a year is not doing well at Nebraska. Coaching is more than just knowing basketball, and without the hometown hero momentum of 2011-2015, he's just a guy that knows basketball but does not like many parts of his job. During his entire tenure at Iowa St he did not need to do much to create a good lockeroom. Iowa State MBB, Ejim, Georges etc did that for him. Not the case at NU.
Last edited: