Officiating travesty in Lawrence

CY88CE11

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 25, 2012
5,412
5,745
113
The Des
A flagrant 1 foul (men's) or unsportsmanlike foul (women's) involves excessive or severe contact during a live ball, including especially when a player "swings an elbow and makes illegal, non-excessive contact with an opponent above the shoulders". This offense includes the former "intentional foul" of fouling an opposing player to prevent an easy breakaway score. In women's basketball only, the unsportsmanlike foul also includes contact dead-ball technical fouls. The penalty for a flagrant 1 or unsportsmanlike foul is two free throws and a throw-in for the opposing team at the out-of-bounds spot nearest the foul.

Setting a screen is not excessive. He did not swing an elbow. He did not foul to prevent a breakaway score. It meets none of the criteria for a flagrant foul.

The ISU player swung his elbow during a live ball and made contact above the shoulders. Textbook definition of a flagrant.

"Swung his elbow" :mccaffery:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jcyclonee

NoCreativity

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
12,492
10,806
113
Des Moines
I never watch the 2 Kansas games live every year, I just get too worked up during the games after watching years and years of screw jobs down there.
I'm not shocked at all with the goal-tend, refs are completely incompetent and corrupt.

The last one I watched live was the Big 12 tourney game back in '14 I think. Self was completely out of control but they T'd up Fred when he actually showed some emotion and stuck up for his team.
 

randomfan44

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2015
7,512
3,703
113
I never watch the 2 Kansas games live every year, I just get too worked up during the games after watching years and years of screw jobs down there.
I'm not shocked at all with the goal-tend, refs are completely incompetent and corrupt.
If the fix was in by the refs then the illegal screen by McCormack with less than a minute left does not get called. That gets ignored 10 times a game and could have easily been ignored once again.
 

CY88CE11

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 25, 2012
5,412
5,745
113
The Des
Did McCormack swing his elbow while in a standard screen setting position? I must have missed that.

I don't think people are arguing that McCormack's should be a flagrant, in a vacuum. However, it was MUCH closer to a flagrant than Jones's. That you're characterizing Jones moving his elbows to run as "swinging his elbow" in a non- basketball move is laughable and pathetic. Aka, par for the course when you come here after a KU screw job.
 

abcguyks

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
2,297
421
83
Olathe
A flagrant 1 foul (men's) or unsportsmanlike foul (women's) involves excessive or severe contact during a live ball, including especially when a player "swings an elbow and makes illegal, non-excessive contact with an opponent above the shoulders". This offense includes the former "intentional foul" of fouling an opposing player to prevent an easy breakaway score. In women's basketball only, the unsportsmanlike foul also includes contact dead-ball technical fouls. The penalty for a flagrant 1 or unsportsmanlike foul is two free throws and a throw-in for the opposing team at the out-of-bounds spot nearest the foul.

Setting a screen is not excessive. He did not swing an elbow. He did not foul to prevent a breakaway score. It meets none of the criteria for a flagrant foul.

The ISU player swung his elbow during a live ball and made contact above the shoulders. Textbook definition of a flagrant.

So you think that a shoulder to the eye socket of a player trying to get past you is not 'excessive or severe'? It was enough to put Kalscheur straight to the floor and it sure didn't look like an act.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyclonehomer

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,997
74,830
113
America
Feel free to provide me some sort of rule book definition of a flagrant 1 in NCAA basketball that would define that play as a flagrant 1. I'll be happy to admit I am wrong if you can.
I’ll let you have your orgasm over that and pretend nothing else has happened for decades that benefits KU.
 

cycfan1

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2006
4,896
2,275
113
Ames
If the fix was in by the refs then the illegal screen by McCormack with less than a minute left does not get called. That gets ignored 10 times a game and could have easily been ignored once again.

Ask George Conditt how many times a game that hip check screen at the three point line gets ignored.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HFCS

randomfan44

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2015
7,512
3,703
113
Exactly. The fact Tuco is defending Jones's flagrant kills all credibility he thought he had.
Jones lifted his elbow and hit the guy behind him in the face. How is that NOT a flagrant? Seriously, give me a reason why it's not. I provided the definition:

" A flagrant 1 foul (men's) or unsportsmanlike foul (women's) involves excessive or severe contact during a live ball, including especially when a player "swings an elbow and makes illegal, non-excessive contact with an opponent above the shoulders". This offense includes the former "intentional foul" of fouling an opposing player to prevent an easy breakaway score. In women's basketball only, the unsportsmanlike foul also includes contact dead-ball technical fouls. The penalty for a flagrant 1 or unsportsmanlike foul is two free throws and a throw-in for the opposing team at the out-of-bounds spot nearest the foul. "

Was it excessive? Yes, it drew blood.
Did he swing his elbow? Yes, His arm was raised and moved to the back (no it was not with intention to hit him).
Did the elbow make illegal contact with a player above the shoulder? Yes. Clearly.

This is a poorly worded rule that was a bad attempt to remove the refs from trying to determine "intent". Now they just say that if you raise your arm up and elbow someone in the face while in a non-basketball move that it is a flagrant 1.
 

twincyties

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
4,564
6,926
113
A flagrant 1 foul (men's) or unsportsmanlike foul (women's) involves excessive or severe contact during a live ball, including especially when a player "swings an elbow and makes illegal, non-excessive contact with an opponent above the shoulders". This offense includes the former "intentional foul" of fouling an opposing player to prevent an easy breakaway score. In women's basketball only, the unsportsmanlike foul also includes contact dead-ball technical fouls. The penalty for a flagrant 1 or unsportsmanlike foul is two free throws and a throw-in for the opposing team at the out-of-bounds spot nearest the foul.

Setting a screen is not excessive. He did not swing an elbow. He did not foul to prevent a breakaway score. It meets none of the criteria for a flagrant foul.

The ISU player swung his elbow during a live ball and made contact above the shoulders. Textbook definition of a flagrant.
you are such a f**king clown if you think he “swung” his elbow. He was going down the lane and quickly tried to change direction. Have you ever seen someone doe that with their hands down by their side? Have you ever seen any kind of basketball play where they have their hands down by their side? JCL was up in his body so much Jones barely had his elbow extended behind his frame? It was nearly parallel to his body.
 

randomfan44

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2015
7,512
3,703
113
Ask George Conditt how many times a game that hip check screen at the three point line gets ignored.
My guess is that he gets called for about 1 out of 3 of them, same as McCormack. It gets ignored all game, otherwise both teams would spend the whole game at the line.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ayagi

CY88CE11

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 25, 2012
5,412
5,745
113
The Des
Jones lifted his elbow and hit the guy behind him in the face. How is that NOT a flagrant? Seriously, give me a reason why it's not. I provided the definition:

" A flagrant 1 foul (men's) or unsportsmanlike foul (women's) involves excessive or severe contact during a live ball, including especially when a player "swings an elbow and makes illegal, non-excessive contact with an opponent above the shoulders". This offense includes the former "intentional foul" of fouling an opposing player to prevent an easy breakaway score. In women's basketball only, the unsportsmanlike foul also includes contact dead-ball technical fouls. The penalty for a flagrant 1 or unsportsmanlike foul is two free throws and a throw-in for the opposing team at the out-of-bounds spot nearest the foul. "

Was it excessive? Yes, it drew blood.
Did he swing his elbow? Yes, His arm was raised and moved to the back (no it was not with intention to hit him).
Did the elbow make illegal contact with a player above the shoulder? Yes. Clearly.

This is a poorly worded rule that was a bad attempt to remove the refs from trying to determine "intent". Now they just say that if you raise your arm up and elbow someone in the face while in a non-basketball move that it is a flagrant 1.

His arm moved in a running motion. Headbutting a moving arm should not generate a flagrant call.
 

randomfan44

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2015
7,512
3,703
113
you are such a f**king clown if you think he “swung” his elbow. He was going down the lane and quickly tried to change direction. Have you ever seen someone doe that with their hands down by their side? Have you ever seen any kind of basketball play where they have their hands down by their side? JCL was up in his body so much Jones barely had his elbow extended behind his frame? It was nearly parallel to his body.
Again, you are trying to determine intent. It doesn't matter what he was trying to do. The rule is "keep track of your elbows or get called". Period.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ayagi

randomfan44

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2015
7,512
3,703
113
His arm moved in a running motion. Headbutting a moving arm should not generate a flagrant call.
If you are running down the court and elbow a dude in the face, it can be called a flagrant. It is dumb, I agree, but it is the way the rule is now written. And he wasn't running, he was starting to seal the guy out for post position so spare me that one. He was facing the side line, not the end line. Not many players I know run sideways.
 
  • Disagree
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ozclone and Ayagi

davegilbertson

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2011
1,856
1,866
113
42
On/off topic question.

Why are regular season conference championships not awarded for football, but are for basketball?

Basketball championships have always been determined by tournaments.

Kind of casts a light on some supposed "championship" records
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cyclonehomer

twincyties

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
4,564
6,926
113
If the fix was in by the refs then the illegal screen by McCormack with less than a minute left does not get called. That gets ignored 10 times a game and could have easily been ignored once again.
He slid into Gabe and leaned his shoulder. A screen that hard gets called every f**king time unless your position is finely established and you’re totally straight up.

You know your problem is that you’re so used to home cooking at the Phog you literally don’t even know the actual rules of basketball anymore.

Enjoy your “win” and look forward to you guys getting bounced by a 7 seed first weekend of the tourney again. Must suck to be a “blue blood” that falls short of your expectations every single year.
 

CY88CE11

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 25, 2012
5,412
5,745
113
The Des
If you are running down the court and elbow a dude in the face, it can be called a flagrant. It is dumb, I agree, but it is the way the rule is now written. And he wasn't running, he was starting to seal the guy out for post position so spare me that one. He was facing the side line, not the end line. Not many players I know run sideways.

And if you set an illegal screen with your shoulder, you can be called for a flagrant. The contact from McCormack was far more excessive than anything Jones did.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: twincyties

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,202
27,227
113
Jones lifted his elbow and hit the guy behind him in the face. How is that NOT a flagrant? Seriously, give me a reason why it's not. I provided the definition:

" A flagrant 1 foul (men's) or unsportsmanlike foul (women's) involves excessive or severe contact during a live ball, including especially when a player "swings an elbow and makes illegal, non-excessive contact with an opponent above the shoulders". This offense includes the former "intentional foul" of fouling an opposing player to prevent an easy breakaway score. In women's basketball only, the unsportsmanlike foul also includes contact dead-ball technical fouls. The penalty for a flagrant 1 or unsportsmanlike foul is two free throws and a throw-in for the opposing team at the out-of-bounds spot nearest the foul. "

Was it excessive? Yes, it drew blood.
Did he swing his elbow? Yes, His arm was raised and moved to the back (no it was not with intention to hit him).
Did the elbow make illegal contact with a player above the shoulder? Yes. Clearly.

This is a poorly worded rule that was a bad attempt to remove the refs from trying to determine "intent". Now they just say that if you raise your arm up and elbow someone in the face while in a non-basketball move that it is a flagrant 1.
LOL get your KU glasses off and rewatch that play. Jones stopped and his momentum caused his elbow to go backwards. He didn’t swing his elbow that’s just the way his body was moving. When you’re 6” taller than someone your elbow is going to be face level to then almost all the time. That’s not a clear flagrant and shouldn’t have been called a flagrant. It’s 100% a judgement call and the refs got it wrong. JUST like they flat out missed the goaltending call.

It’s no doubt a foul on Jones but to call that a flagrant is so suspect. Both announcers even agreed.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron