Officiating travesty in Lawrence

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,780
13,417
113
But then this more clear shot looks like there is space. Again, probably OK with it going either way but of course, it is going to be called to KU favor.

View attachment 94297
But are we really sure these are Grill's legs/feet?


Just trying to keep the debate going. Devil's advocate and all. a1 a ping.png
 

jcyclonee

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
23,283
26,194
113
Minneapolis
Live lookin at Twins without his CF:
giphy.gif


Just kidding, Twins, love ya!
He's staying busy. His minivan has never been so clean.
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,780
13,417
113
JFC everyone knows random is Tuco.
Either way, dude's a giant douche who spends all his time trolling an ISU website and acting like he isn't. Just like Surly.
He's even admitted it, hasn't he?
It's beyond obvious.
two weeks ago he was arguing ISU players foul elbows with their chin and now he’s arguing the most inadvertent elbow to chin fouls are automatic flagrant.

That sums it up.
Life on CF is an education.
Kansas is morally superior | CycloneFanatic: The Internet's most popular site for fans of the Iowa State Cyclones
I already posted here that the article was idiotic, literally two posts above your post. Twocoach was my old User ID here that I do not have any longer.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: VeloClone

isujeep

Member
Jan 11, 2007
33
10
8
Didn't they initially call it a 2?
I was at the game. I'm pretty sure they called it a 3 on the scoreboard and then after review, took a point off. I'm not 100% positive on that but that is my recollection.

On the non called goaltending. I was on the opposite end of the court halfway up the top section and could tell from there the ball hit the back board first, and I'm 50 years old and need readers to look at my phone. How all three refs missed that is inexcusable.
 

cygrads

Well-Known Member
Jul 27, 2007
4,969
2,728
113
Altoona, IA
Just finished watching the game and while I'm sure typical KU fan would say it was evenly called game the flagrant foul wasn't and KU got 2free throws and then the non goaltending call took 2 points off our score and that's the game. No questionable calls on Kansas led directly to points as those two calls did.
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,780
13,417
113
That wasn't a mistake, it was a deliberate no-call, the reason which we all know from watching Kansas basketball for years.
True, and becomes prominent the last few minutes of a tight game as they attempt to shape its outcome.
 

randomfan44

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2015
7,512
3,703
113
Question: Is there anything in the ncaa rule book about not being allowed to touch the ball once it hits the backboard? Because I assumed it wasn't allowed but haven't actually looked at that part of the rule book.

The ball was definitely not over the cylinder and definitely not on the way down. Can someone post the a tual ncaa rules? My kid is pestering me so I can't look them up right now..
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,052
21,038
113
Question: Is there anything in the ncaa rule book about not being allowed to touch the ball once it hits the backboard? Because I assumed it wasn't allowed but haven't actually looked at that part of the rule book.

The ball was definitely not over the cylinder and definitely not on the way down. Can someone post the a tual ncaa rules? My kid is pestering me so I can't look them up right now..
You could read the Wikipedia page on “goaltending” and see the links to the references. It’s in like the first paragraph.

But I loved your moron fans booing after the most obvious of fouls. What a stupid fanbase.
 

thisISnextyear

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 29, 2007
2,406
1,592
113
Ames
Interesting. I never saw a call so I assumed it had to be called a 2 since I sure as hell couldn't see a definitive view of it either way. If that view overturned a call of a 3, I would like to see what view was enough to overturn it.
I don't know if anyone called anything on this as the scoreboard inside of AFH never changed after the basket until they reviewed it. If they did call something on the floor, they should have given us the points(either a 2 or a 3) and then let it stand or change it after review.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: VeloClone

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,780
13,417
113
Question: Is there anything in the ncaa rule book about not being allowed to touch the ball once it hits the backboard? Because I assumed it wasn't allowed but haven't actually looked at that part of the rule book.

The ball was definitely not over the cylinder and definitely not on the way down. Can someone post the a tual ncaa rules? My kid is pestering me so I can't look them up right now..
@randomfan44,
Why?

:confused: I'm sure you may have a reason. I just can't think of one myself.
Bump.

I see you are avoiding my question. Why? The 'why' refers to why you are even on this board?

Why do you persist coming here on a rival's board, to continually discuss and argue with your opponents fanbase? Even to the point of acquiring a new user name after previously being banned from this site?

What drives you?
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron