Well, my life was sure enriched after seeing it, so much so I am planning to watch it againI doubt my life will be any less enriched if I don't see it.
Well, my life was sure enriched after seeing it, so much so I am planning to watch it againI doubt my life will be any less enriched if I don't see it.
I tend to agree with this, but I also put peddling scientology and it's enablers pretty high on the ladder of scum.I don't understand why people get worked up over actors personal lives. Same goes for musicians. As long as they aren't doing anything heinous like Cosby who cares. If you are going to limit yourself to actors and performers who's personal choices you agree with you are going to severely limit your entertainment options. A lot of those people are detached from reality.
Check out these F-16 RC controlled planes. These would be so cool to play with
I doubt my life will be any less enriched if I don't see it.
I'd still put Will Smith up there, though he's gone for more serious roles that showcase his considerable acting chops, especially in the last 15 years or so. Leo is also similarly bankable, but he's a more traditional movie star rather than action hero.I haven't been to a movie theatre in 5 years, but this was worth it. Tom Cruise might be the last movie star left. Can't think of any other actor with that much charisma on the big screen.
Cruise’s best role was Les Grossman in Tropic ThunderI'd still put Will Smith up there, though he's gone for more serious roles that showcase his considerable acting chops, especially in the last 15 years or so. Leo is also similarly bankable, but he's a more traditional movie star rather than action hero.
Cruise's career has honestly been pretty disappointing, IMO. He's free to do what he wants, but for a guy who had a 13-year run in the 80s and 90s that included Top Gun, The Color of Money, Rain Man, A Few Good Men, Born on the Fourth of July, The Firm, Mission Impossible, Jerry Maguire and Eyes Wide Shut, it's hard not to wonder what could have been if he hadn't chosen to pigeonhole himself as a blockbuster action star. He's only wandered out of that genre a few times since 2000. There's nothing wrong with making those kinds of films, but I think he demonstrated quite clearly early in his career that he could do a lot more than that.
Sometimes people just like having the big checks and don’t care if they are put in one zone.I'd still put Will Smith up there, though he's gone for more serious roles that showcase his considerable acting chops, especially in the last 15 years or so. Leo is also similarly bankable, but he's a more traditional movie star rather than action hero.
Cruise's career has honestly been pretty disappointing, IMO. He's free to do what he wants, but for a guy who had a 13-year run in the 80s and 90s that included Top Gun, The Color of Money, Rain Man, A Few Good Men, Born on the Fourth of July, The Firm, Mission Impossible, Jerry Maguire and Eyes Wide Shut, it's hard not to wonder what could have been if he hadn't chosen to pigeonhole himself as a blockbuster action star. He's only wandered out of that genre a few times since 2000. There's nothing wrong with making those kinds of films, but I think he demonstrated quite clearly early in his career that he could do a lot more than that.
And like I said, that's fine. I just wish we'd gotten more of his 80s/90s performances than more Mission Impossible films.Sometimes people just like having the big checks and don’t care if they are put in one zone.
He did Collateral, Minority Report, Last Samurai, American Made, War of the World, Valkyrie and Tropic Thunder. That could be considered not a "franchise" movie. It could also be that Hollywood has changed too since then, there are less and less mid budget films.I'd still put Will Smith up there, though he's gone for more serious roles that showcase his considerable acting chops, especially in the last 15 years or so. Leo is also similarly bankable, but he's a more traditional movie star rather than action hero.
Cruise's career has honestly been pretty disappointing, IMO. He's free to do what he wants, but for a guy who had a 13-year run in the 80s and 90s that included Top Gun, The Color of Money, Rain Man, A Few Good Men, Born on the Fourth of July, The Firm, Mission Impossible, Jerry Maguire and Eyes Wide Shut, it's hard not to wonder what could have been if he hadn't chosen to pigeonhole himself as a blockbuster action star. He's only wandered out of that genre a few times since 2000. There's nothing wrong with making those kinds of films, but I think he demonstrated quite clearly early in his career that he could do a lot more than that.
I watched it on Sunday at the Waukee IMAX. The movie was incredible and really well done. With young kids and a busy schedule, I rarely go to the theatre but this movie was definitely worth seeing (especially in IMAX). The flying scenes were so intense that I felt exhausted after the movie was over.
The only bad part of the experience was that I accidentally clicked a button on the theatre seat that turned on heated seats. It took me a few minutes to figure out how to turn that off but it made things a bit uncomfortable.
I would love to see the Les Grossman spin off movie. I think there were some talks about this happening.Cruise’s best role was Les Grossman in Tropic Thunder
Nobody wants a movie like Top Gun to challenge their view of the world.It’s like an amusement park ride if you see on a huge screen. Very fun but not going to challenge your view of the world.
I totally get why it’s a movie everybody would give at east a B walking out of theater.