Nebraska sux

Frak

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2009
11,449
7,055
113
The problem with the bolded is that Nebraska and their fans don't think that's good enough. Of course they can have results like Iowa and ISU but the reality is that they will rarely be in the national title/playoff discussion.

Yeah, they have to come to terms with that. Maybe they have already, I don't know. You'd think that the last 10 years would have been a little humbling.
 

cycloneworld

Facebook Knows All
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2006
30,179
22,529
113
Urbandale, IA
Campbell told a recruit all the jobs he turned down last year. Given the list, he ain’t leaving.

I'd love to know if the rumors were true that he would have left for USC last year had he been offered (who could blame him).

I think there is a 0.00001% chance he would leave for Nebraska. Why? Admin/boosters are a trainwreck and he can win as much here as he can at Nebraska.
 

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
17,496
31,818
113
I'd love to know if the rumors were true that he would have left for USC last year had he been offered (who could blame him).

I think there is a 0.00001% chance he would leave for Nebraska. Why? Admin/boosters are a trainwreck and he can win as much here as he can at Nebraska.

I have a really hard time buying that rumor...Cali is LA is the complete opposite of what CMC seems to like.
 

jcyclonee

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
23,270
26,180
113
Minneapolis
I'd love to know if the rumors were true that he would have left for USC last year had he been offered (who could blame him).

I think there is a 0.00001% chance he would leave for Nebraska. Why? Admin/boosters are a trainwreck and he can win as much here as he can at Nebraska.

I have a really hard time buying that rumor...Cali is LA is the complete opposite of what CMC seems to like.
I don't buy that rumor either. However, I do buy the rumor that he would have left for ND if that had been offered.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,965
41,694
113
Waukee
I don't buy that rumor either. However, I do buy the rumor that he would have left for ND if that had been offered.

I completely buy Campbell is gone if he gets a call from South Bend, Columbus, Ann Arbor, or State College. Anywhere else? Not sure he'd see that as anything but a lateral move or a terrible geographic and cultural fit (e.g., USC or any of the SEC schools). He seems serious about staying in the Midwest.

Until then, though, and that day may never come, here he is.
 

LarryISU

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2013
2,316
3,200
113
Omaha
If a football dynasty can be built in Lincoln, Nebraska, and one once was, there is zero reason the same cannot be achieved in Ames, Iowa. None.
Tom Osborne decided early on, he could not compete with the big dogs by playing the same game they did. That is how he ended up with that triple option offense. It was different. They also took every player they could get, grades were irrelevant, rap sheet irrelevant. They had 150 players on their teams. He did things differently and it paid off.

I'm not sure anyone can really do the same thing today, is my point. Fred kind of did it with basketball, took in a bunch of misfits who were really good players and got them to sit a year. He essentially invented turning your program around with transfers. Now, everyone does it, so it couldn't be sustained.

In football, I think CMC switched things up with Heacock and his defensive schemes and that's what really helped to make us competitive in the Big 12. But with scholarship limits, NIL, transfer portal, political correctness (by that I mean the things Osborne got away with are not acceptable today, well unless you are a private school like Baylor), I just don't know that the opportunity is there to build a dynasty.

But, I'm fine with having the teams we have. In football, we beat top 10 teams and go to bowl games. In basketball, the last ten years, we also beat top 10 teams and win conference tournaments and make the Sweet Sixteen. Women's basketball, we beat Baylor probably more than anyone. We are doing great.
 

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,366
39,459
113
I don't buy that rumor either. However, I do buy the rumor that he would have left for ND if that had been offered.

There just seemed to be so much smoke about USC---I'm not sure I believe it was total crap. The USC rumors were much more than the other schools in previous years. And he acted a bit different last year. I agree that it always seemed like a bad fit, but plenty of coaches take 'bad fit' jobs---none of them think a job really is a bad fit.

My theory is that he really listened to schools last year. I'd bet that he talked to USC and details of the job were discussed. I'm not sure that he told them 'yes', but I'd bet the talks were pretty far along.

I would be interested in why we never heard about the extension that was supposed to happen after the USC job was filled, but before Notre Dame opened up.

As I said before, I sort of think that last year we might have dodged the biggest bullet. I'm hopeful he came out of it with the itch satisfied and happy where he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcyclonee

Dr.bannedman

liberal
Aug 21, 2012
8,677
9,878
113
that island napoleon got sent to
Tom Osborne decided early on, he could not compete with the big dogs by playing the same game they did. That is how he ended up with that triple option offense. It was different. They also took every player they could get, grades were irrelevant, rap sheet irrelevant. They had 150 players on their teams. He did things differently and it paid off.

I'm not sure anyone can really do the same thing today, is my point. Fred kind of did it with basketball, took in a bunch of misfits who were really good players and got them to sit a year. He essentially invented turning your program around with transfers. Now, everyone does it, so it couldn't be sustained.

In football, I think CMC switched things up with Heacock and his defensive schemes and that's what really helped to make us competitive in the Big 12. But with scholarship limits, NIL, transfer portal, political correctness (by that I mean the things Osborne got away with are not acceptable today, well unless you are a private school like Baylor), I just don't know that the opportunity is there to build a dynasty.

But, I'm fine with having the teams we have. In football, we beat top 10 teams and go to bowl games. In basketball, the last ten years, we also beat top 10 teams and win conference tournaments and make the Sweet Sixteen. Women's basketball, we beat Baylor probably more than anyone. We are doing great.


you forgot steroids
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,381
55,299
113
Tom Osborne decided early on, he could not compete with the big dogs by playing the same game they did. That is how he ended up with that triple option offense. It was different. They also took every player they could get, grades were irrelevant, rap sheet irrelevant. They had 150 players on their teams. He did things differently and it paid off.

I'm not sure anyone can really do the same thing today, is my point. Fred kind of did it with basketball, took in a bunch of misfits who were really good players and got them to sit a year. He essentially invented turning your program around with transfers. Now, everyone does it, so it couldn't be sustained.

In football, I think CMC switched things up with Heacock and his defensive schemes and that's what really helped to make us competitive in the Big 12. But with scholarship limits, NIL, transfer portal, political correctness (by that I mean the things Osborne got away with are not acceptable today, well unless you are a private school like Baylor), I just don't know that the opportunity is there to build a dynasty.

But, I'm fine with having the teams we have. In football, we beat top 10 teams and go to bowl games. In basketball, the last ten years, we also beat top 10 teams and win conference tournaments and make the Sweet Sixteen. Women's basketball, we beat Baylor probably more than anyone. We are doing great.

Nebraska was pretty dynastyish before Osbourne got there, fwiw.
 

JUKEBOX

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2008
7,961
1,479
113
Nebraska was pretty dynastyish before Osbourne got there, fwiw.
They were good before, but I think it's fair to give credit to Osborne for creating the last (modern?) Husker dynasty. He joined Devaney's staff in 1962 and re-invented their offense and retired 35 years later winning national championships 3 out of the last 4 seasons.

However I suspect he saw the writing on the wall at the end since many of the strategies he developed to build Nebraska into a powerhouse were becoming outlawed (or outdated), so the talent pool of available players started shrinking.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: khardbored

JUKEBOX

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2008
7,961
1,479
113
If a football dynasty can be built in Lincoln, Nebraska, and one once was, there is zero reason the same cannot be achieved in Ames, Iowa. None.
I agree. I don't think it's an impossibility for someone to build another dynasty in Lincoln, but it would require new strategies that could likely equally be implemented/achieved in Ames.

Unless Warren Buffett decides to pay-to-win haha
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2122

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,258
27,934
113
Dez Moy Nez
One of the contractors on site today was from Omaha. We talked about Nebby and Frost. He was very grounded. Even said go Cyclones when he left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: khardbored