Not sure what state this is from from the guy you posted it I think it's NJ but wow.
This can't be real, right?
Not sure what state this is from from the guy you posted it I think it's NJ but wow.
Problem with that is same teams keep playing each other.They really should keep things regional as much as possible until the semifinals.
They really should keep things regional as much as possible until the semifinals.
OABGIC. jesus dudes. just change it to Idasac or something
Problem with that is same teams keep playing each other.
Except when the 2 best teams meet in the quarter finals and should be been in the dome for a semi or final game..... Been there. We lost by a point to the eventual state champ that didn't have a close game the rest of the way.Which imo is more fun. Lots of fans from different small towns gathering for some old fashioned rivalries.
Except when the 2 best teams meet in the quarter finals and should be been in the dome for a semi or final game..... Been there. We lost by a point to the eventual state champ that didn't have a close game the rest of the way.
How is it set up currently? They should just have Western side vs Eastern side brackets and use 35 as the dividing line.They do, to some extent. It helps if the best 4 teams are spread out enough to have other opponents available.
That’s basically how they used to do it. That’s not perfect either, as you often have 3 or 4 of the best teams (in the largest class anyway) on the West side and that system guaranteed an East side team a spot in the championship. So two dominant West teams play each other in the semis, knocking out one of them, and a weaker East team got a pass to the finals where they get blown out.How is it set up currently? They should just have Western side vs Eastern side brackets and use 35 as the dividing line.
It is real, that converted a 4th and 7, and the offense scored to take the lead after that. The other team (that was leading at the time of this video) ended up scoring later to win the game, so this didn’t change the outcome, but still … what a terrible look.This can't be real, right?
This can't be real, right?
Damn you Drew0311. You beat me to it. HAHAHA!Same guy who reffed Iowa State game against Texas and today vs Oklahoma
I was doing the gladbrook reinbeck game and we were hoping for a rematch of their game about a month in a half ago.Ooh, Don Bosco goes down, that’s a bit of a surprise.
I think ABC would work.OABGIC. jesus dudes. just change it to Idasac or something
always set the ball on a hash after a first down when spotting the ball. no one in the stands would ever know. makes it 100% easier.It is real, that converted a 4th and 7, and the offense scored to take the lead after that. The other team (that was leading at the time of this video) ended up scoring later to win the game, so this didn’t change the outcome, but still … what a terrible look.
Some of the comments I see online are 1) the chains were set inaccurately/moved between plays and the ref was trying to correct for that and 2) high school refs typically start each 1st and 10 right on a hash mark to help make measurements easier.
These arguments have a few problems - I don’t think I’ve noticed officials making the effort to place the ball directly on a hash on each and every 1st down, and I’ve watched a lot of high school football over the past 17 years. I also worked on a chain gang one year; the very system of chains is weird anyway, based on a subjective decision of where the ball should be spotted on every play, and there’s a little marker on the chains that gets set on the link right on the front edge of a hash mark on every 1st down. That’s how the chains get set accurately, not the sticks, it’s where that little marker is.
Regardless, there’s no valid explanation of chain mechanics/hash marks/correcting an error that would include the ref picking up the ball and moving it forward to touch the stick and grant the first down. That is inexcusable and outrageous right there.
(He also is rocking a pretty bitchin’ beard for a high school ref.)
Also, check out the official holding the stick after the ref signals first down and picks up the ball. He stands there frozen for a second just staring at the spot, like he can’t believe what he just saw.
Officials (ones who are seasoned at least) in HS, college, pro will try to have one point touching the yard line, either front or back on first down at least.It is real, that converted a 4th and 7, and the offense scored to take the lead after that. The other team (that was leading at the time of this video) ended up scoring later to win the game, so this didn’t change the outcome, but still … what a terrible look.
Some of the comments I see online are 1) the chains were set inaccurately/moved between plays and the ref was trying to correct for that and 2) high school refs typically start each 1st and 10 right on a hash mark to help make measurements easier.
These arguments have a few problems - I don’t think I’ve noticed officials making the effort to place the ball directly on a hash on each and every 1st down, and I’ve watched a lot of high school football over the past 17 years. I also worked on a chain gang one year; the very system of chains is weird anyway, based on a subjective decision of where the ball should be spotted on every play, and there’s a little marker on the chains that gets set on the link right on the front edge of a hash mark on every 1st down. That’s how the chains get set accurately, not the sticks, it’s where that little marker is.
Regardless, there’s no valid explanation of chain mechanics/hash marks/correcting an error that would include the ref picking up the ball and moving it forward to touch the stick and grant the first down. That is inexcusable and outrageous right there.
(He also is rocking a pretty bitchin’ beard for a high school ref.)
Also, check out the official holding the stick after the ref signals first down and picks up the ball. He stands there frozen for a second just staring at the spot, like he can’t believe what he just saw.