It's unfortunate that both Brock and Norton were both less than themselves for ~3 games. If we would of had at least one of them at 95% healthy for KU, KSU, and UT...
I don’t think Brock was anywhere near healthy since the KU game
It's unfortunate that both Brock and Norton were both less than themselves for ~3 games. If we would of had at least one of them at 95% healthy for KU, KSU, and UT...
The margin of loss in those 3 games was so small, it wouldn't of taken much to tip it the other way.People forget that before they got hurt we were already near bottom for rushing stats and rankings. Not sure what that would have looked like in those losses, but they were hardly our biggest issues in those games.
Brock had 104, 100, and 76 in the first three games...that 76 was on 7 carries. He got hurt on the first play of game 4...his injury should not be downplayed. Norton needs reps as a true freshman.People forget that before they got hurt we were already near bottom for rushing stats and rankings. Not sure what that would have looked like in those losses, but they were hardly our biggest issues in those games.
The reason the offense struggled in the other areas is because of the lack of a run game.People forget that before they got hurt we were already near bottom for rushing stats and rankings. Not sure what that would have looked like in those losses, but they were hardly our biggest issues in those games.
He's a RB we have not had in a while (norton). I wouldn't say he's a slasher, definitely a bigger RB for us. I think he can be good, not going to be our guy to do 50 yard runs or house calls like Breece would.Great game from Norton. I’d also like to give props to Silas for busting a couple of big runs.
Brock had 104, 100, and 76 in the first three games...that 76 was on 7 carries. He got hurt on the first play of game 4...his injury should not be downplayed. Norton needs reps as a true freshman.
He’s basically Stevie Hicks. Won’t wow you, but by the end of the game the other team’s defense is like “****. This guy again”?He's a RB we have not had in a while (norton). I wouldn't say he's a slasher, definitely a bigger RB for us. I think he can be good, not going to be our guy to do 50 yard runs or house calls like Breece would.
He is money in the red zone, I know that. We have been severely missing someone who can take a negative 1 yard run into a 3 yard run, he did that multiple times today.
God rest his saintly soul...He’s basically Stevie Hicks. Won’t wow you, but by the end of the game the other team’s defense is like “****. This guy again”?
The ISU rushing attack was really good with Brock before he got hurt. Maybe it is just who you are playing, but after he got hurt it was really painful to watch the running game. He still didn't look 100% before today. Hopefully it isn't anything serious. ISU needs more than a couple healthy running backs.Brock had 104, 100, and 76 in the first three games...that 76 was on 7 carries. He got hurt on the first play of game 4...his injury should not be downplayed. Norton needs reps as a true freshman.
That dude for WVU looked out cold.I'd like to see a slow mo of his trucking TD captured at field level from the WV side.
Yeah, announcers said that Campbell said he was maybe 60-70% last week, and he looked like it as he was wincing after getting hit a couple times.I don’t think Brock was anywhere near healthy since the KU game
God rest his saintly soul...
Didn't we lose him, Ennis Haywood, and Hiawatha Rutland all too young?God rest his saintly soul...
Yep. All gone too soon.Didn't we lose him, Ennis Haywood, and Hiawatha Rutland all too young?
After seeing some of his runs today, I'm thinking better than that.He’s basically Stevie Hicks. Won’t wow you, but by the end of the game the other team’s defense is like “****. This guy again”?
Don't lower your head to tackle, kids.On Norton's second touchdown, he KO'd #32 for WVU.
![]()
The targeting rule is to protect defenders too, not just ball carriers.Don't lower your head to tackle, kids.