If that happens, I’m asking JLH if I can motorboat because crazy is happening.
If that kind of craziness is happening, she'll be asking you
If that happens, I’m asking JLH if I can motorboat because crazy is happening.
Seems to be the consensus?The terrible ACC TV deal is reason #1 why the Big 12 needs to cherry pick the PAC. The SEC and B1G will eventually get the ACC teams they want and several others will be Big 12 bound. This solidifies the Big 12 as the #3 conference.
The PAC network loses money. ESPN+ brings money in. How does going from 12 mouths to feed to 24 mouths to feed suddenly make it profitable? And not only profitable, but twice as profitable as what the conference gets from ESPN+.
Conference channels that don't have the leverage to force distribution will not succeed. Quite frankly, as more and more people go to streaming, I'm not sure the BTN model will hold up as well as it has thus far. Once people have options, Rutgers isn't going to pull in nearly the revenue from NYC as it did in linear cable networks. Same with Minnesota, and Indiana, and Maryland.
I dont think bowl tie ins move the needle at all when it comes to conference realignment. With the expanded playoff they will even be less important.How do bowl/conference tie-ups impact conference restructuring? Do expanded play-off schemes do away with bowl/conference tie-ups? If not, I can't even imagine what the SEC would do to take the PAC12's slot in the Rose Bowl and I don't think we would ever see a "badder" junkyard dog than the B1G protecting theirs. Would it be worth picking up the best of the rest of PAC12 schools if the Rose Bowl slot came with them?
How do bowl/conference tie-ups impact conference restructuring? Do expanded play-off schemes do away with bowl/conference tie-ups? If not, I can't even imagine what the SEC would do to take the PAC12's slot in the Rose Bowl and I don't think we would ever see a "badder" junkyard dog than the B1G protecting theirs. Would it be worth picking up the best of the rest of PAC12 schools if the Rose Bowl slot came with them?
I believe the conference’s deals and bowl affiliations stay intact as long as the conference exists. That’s why if the PAC gets raided by the B12, the remaining schools are far more likely to backfill and continue on as the PAC than disband the conference and join the MWC.How do bowl/conference tie-ups impact conference restructuring? Do expanded play-off schemes do away with bowl/conference tie-ups? If not, I can't even imagine what the SEC would do to take the PAC12's slot in the Rose Bowl and I don't think we would ever see a "badder" junkyard dog than the B1G protecting theirs. Would it be worth picking up the best of the rest of PAC12 schools if the Rose Bowl slot came with them?
I bet they fly.Keep seeing rumors about Cal, Stanford, WU, Oregon to the ACC?
How in the holy hell does that make any sense? Washington to Florida State is one mother ****** of a road trip
Keep seeing rumors about Cal, Stanford, WU, Oregon to the ACC?
How in the holy hell does that make any sense? Washington to Florida State is one mother ****** of a road trip
It's complicated. But one idea would be to merge the P12N into ESPN's properties as they are with the Longhorn Network. The B12 is now pretty much on ESPN's platform. The network has obvious interest in the P12 as well.
Spreading the network to the plains increases viewership perhaps exponentially. Games like Oregon at ISU or oSu at Washington would be hugely interesting to a national audience as well, to say nothing for Arizona/Ku hoops.
My sense is that the P12 has problems associated mostly with fans out there not caring. Merging that inventory with the Midwest would be a fix of sorts. The alliance would also be much more competitive with the SEC and B10 on multiple levels.
I don't like the idea of destroying one conference to benefit another and leaving out many schools as a result like Stanford, WSU and the like. Seems unethical and unwise.
I actually think it makes plenty of sense and is pretty much the only hope for either conference and/or its members to survive all this. An "American Coastal Conference" adding those schools to the current ACC would be a decent cultural fit as many share the same academic snobbery. And a conference with the likes of Oregon, Clemson, Washington, FSU, UNC, Miami, Stanford, Duke, GT, etc. wouldn't be a horrible lineup. Obviously ND would be the golden goose but I don't ever see that happening, and they'd still likely get raided once the GoR is up, but I think it'd be a pretty good hail mary.Keep seeing rumors about Cal, Stanford, WU, Oregon to the ACC?
How in the holy hell does that make any sense? Washington to Florida State is one mother ****** of a road trip
Keep seeing rumors about Cal, Stanford, WU, Oregon to the ACC?
How in the holy hell does that make any sense? Washington to Florida State is one mother ****** of a road trip
In a matter of about 1 year the PAC went from the hot, stuck up cheerleader that wouldn't look at the big XII, to the now crazy, meth addict with a couple kids.
I think the GOR would be a roadblock. If it opens up the GOR, I could see 8-10 ACC schools being firmly against it. If the GOR remains in place, I can't see WAOR signing on to a deal that runs almost through the B10/B12's next (not the ones they signed last year) deals.The only sense it makes is that it would potentially reopen negotiations for a TV contract for the ACC. But, that may also give Clemson and FSU an opportunity to bolt if they won't sign the deal. It's a big risk fro the ACC and for the PAC schools that would presumably need to blow up the PAC before setting up the TV contracts with the ACC.
I think the GOR would be a roadblock. If it opens up the GOR, I could see 8-10 ACC schools being firmly against it. If the GOR remains in place, I can't see WAOR signing on to a deal that runs almost through the B10/B12's next (not the ones they signed last year) deals.
There's another theory out there that there might not be all that much more network money available right now at the SEC/B10 level. That could explain why the B10 hasn't finished off the PAC by taking WAOR. The networks might be more agreeable to paying certain schools in the B12/ACC for the next 7-12 years.
The RSNs are at the brink of BK.
ESPN is talking about "must haves" vs "nice to haves"
The streamers may be the future, but they don't seem like the present
This seems plausible.
By boat through the Panama Canal is my guessI bet they fly.
Oregon always takes the Oregon trail when the can. Duh.By boat through the Panama Canal is my guess