Category 5 CultureI'm just joining this thread, but wondering what the #C5C is on the twitter posts? I saw this last year but don't understand what is is supposed to mean.
Category 5 CultureI'm just joining this thread, but wondering what the #C5C is on the twitter posts? I saw this last year but don't understand what is is supposed to mean.
Did you say that about walk on Hornacek too? Or weren’t you born yet! If the kid can shoot he’ll have a chance!He might be our best walkon for a while. He will never play unless foul trouble or a blowout but a great player for Practice.
Did you say that about walk on Hornacek too? Or weren’t you born yet! If the kid can shoot he’ll have a chance!
Even the one where he fell on Hoiberg's foot?Hornacek wasn’t a normal walk on. Hornacek was promised a scholarship if he walked on. He just had to wait for the next year to start. Yes I was born and yes I saw Horny play at Hilton almost every game
It looks like a step back statistically but would actually be huge. There are just as many losses to go around as wins so there are bound to be some that don't get in. Generally speaking, the new adds are more likely to be solid football programs than basketball juggernauts.9/14 in the dance is actually a significant step back from getting 7/10 or 8/10 lately.
I'm not exactly complaining because I think the league has been more stacked than necessary for quite a while and doesn't get acknowledged for it unless the B12 wins the ncaa tournament.
If 5 teams actually aren't dance worthy, I am totally fine with that and hopefully we get at least 7 games against those teams on the schedule.
9/14 in the dance is actually a significant step back from getting 7/10 or 8/10 lately.
I'm not exactly complaining because I think the league has been more stacked than necessary for quite a while and doesn't get acknowledged for it unless the B12 wins the ncaa tournament.
If 5 teams actually aren't dance worthy, I am totally fine with that and hopefully we get at least 7 games against those teams on the schedule.
These projections are just projections but...
View attachment 114359
Anybody in the top 35 or so is a virtual lock to make the tournament.
So that gives you 6/14 to start with KU, UH, UT, TCU, BU, and TTU. It wouldn't surprise me if one or two of these teams underperforms -- these projections are hard -- and a few of them teams lower down on the list have surprising seasons and jet towards the top of the list, but just go with me.
#36 through #65 is roughly "the bubble" (though a lot more teams will make it into the tournament in the 30s and 40s than will in the 50s and 60s). Everybody else in the conference save UCF is in this range. So if you can get 3/7 of KSU, BYU, UC, ISU, OSU, and OU, then you might end up with 9/14.
It is going to be difficult but it will be possible. The Big 12 is going to need to dominate in the non-con and then have a lot of teams with records close to 0.500 in the conference rather than more stratification between the teams towards the top and towards the middle. It will be entertaining to watch.