ISU Gambling Megathread

CloneLawman

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
17,006
21,822
113
Wherever I go, there I am.
Not gonna lie, the downplaying/joking of Blom betting on the Iowa under by national media guys is really weird. Like of course we/us will make those jokes on the forums, but national guys with actual credentials doing it horribly undercuts the loss of eligibility for him and the implications these bets imply for states that didn't investigate it.
Rece Davis is a putz.
 

CycloneWanderer

Well-Known Member
Nov 4, 2007
8,337
5,687
113
Wandering
Could not agree with you more. CMC’s conference record is at best OK and if you throw out the COVID year it is not particularly impressive given the money invested in this program. Last year was embarrassing and the TCU loss was Jim Walden BAD. And something I thought we had put behind us—kind of like the brutally bad special teams’ play all through CDM’s tenure. But I digress. AND I was in the stands in 1985 when we lost to Drake. I am sick and tired of some fans thinking CMC is the best we can do. He has this year to show some improvement, but when we are legitimately talking about a 4 win season, that isn’t good enough for this lifelong fan. And the Dekkers situation underlies fundamental questions about recruiting, character judgment, and team discipline. That is ALL on the Head Coach.
Considering the number of sports and schools caught up in the gambling stuff, I'm not going to be that hard on a coach for it happening once. Learn from it and make sure it doesn't repeat.

We really need to look at this in context. The covid year was great and we shouldn't discount it. We had a lot of relatively "topped out" players back from that season who did not show a lot of improvement between covid season and the next. I think the extra year of eligibility for many actually hurt our program's ability to cycle in new, potentially more talented players and we suffered through some of the cost of that last year. Now, last year was super disappointing, but I also think we shouldn't ignore the fact that we were competitive in many of the games we ended up losing by less than 7 with an extremely young and one-dimensional offense. It's not like we were consistently getting blow out , like has been in the past. If you are a lifer, you should know that there has to be more criteria that go into your perspective of ISU football than W-L.

Some will reference DMac or Rhoads, but there were other indications of stagnating in each of those cases. Rhoads' first season was his only winning season. He had 6 consecutive losing seasons, no recruiting growth, and never had a winning conference record. DMac only had 1 winning conference record in 11 years during a time when the Big12 north was historically weak. CMC has 5 winning seasons in a much more competitive, 9-game conference format.

This is CMC's first real trial during his time here (1st year is a pass for me, since he was just hitting the ground) and he has made adjustments. Recruiting has improved. We are competitive in a lot of games. We are seeing change in the conference that should help us be more consistently competitive. Let's give him the time to cook.
 

SolterraCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
2,402
3,311
113
38
I think it was rounded out to 58%? I made most of my money on futures including betting 25 on KSU to win the BIG12 and for Iowa womens bball to beat South Carolina. My actual small dollar bets were 58% all the way through.

Also put a bet 15 dollar bet on UCONN to reach the final 4 after they destroyed us in the Nike tournament.
Damn nice hits! Ok so you hit some nice futures with the KSU and UConn bets. Which is why you came out so far ahead. Cause at 58% on traditional bets (against the spread, O/U) you would not have a balance of $450 on $150 initial bankroll I don’t think. But you sold yourself short, if you’re hitting 58% you’re a good gambler

To give you my perspective (I’m a ****** gambler). This year I’ve put in $300. I’ve wagered $538 (80% more than my bankroll) on 12 bets. I have $175 left in my balance. So I could have theoretically wagered about $700. Say $800 assuming I win some of those additional bets. 2.6x my deposit.

If we extrapolate that to $45K, he’d need a bankroll of $16,875. Let’s say he gets $2K of free bets from the apps, that’s $14,875. So I overestimated at $25K, but still a lot more cash than I’d think he’d have on hand.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Cfinnerty16

cyclonez7

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
6,577
1,999
113
Ankeny
At what point do we start investigating college kids fantasy football teams and March madness pools?
 

Tailg8er

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2011
7,883
4,736
113
38
Johnston
Damn nice hits! Ok so you hit some nice futures with the KSU and UConn bets. Which is why you came out so far ahead. Cause at 58% on traditional bets (against the spread, O/U) you would not have a balance of $450 on $150 initial bankroll I don’t think. But you sold yourself short, if you’re hitting 58% you’re a good gambler

To give you my perspective (I’m a ****** gambler). This year I’ve put in $300. I’ve wagered $538 (20% more than my bankroll) on 12 bets. I have $175 left in my balance. So I could have theoretically wagered about $700. Say $800 assuming I win some of those additional bets. 2.6x my deposit.

If we extrapolate that to $45K, he’d need a bankroll of $16,875. Let’s say he gets $2K of free bets from the apps, that’s $14,875. So I overestimated at $25K, but still a lot more cash than I’d think he’d have on hand.

I've only deposited $250 ever into DraftKings, but I've bet a total of $17,438...

These numbers are deceiving AF.



Screenshot_20230802-132448.png
 

Marcelason78

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2022
3,817
4,451
113
Does this mean the afore mentioned Brock, Hanika, Remsburg, and Lee are in the clear, or are these just ones charged criminally?
Maybe Jeremy can shed some light on this. Seems to be a lot of ‘everybody knows’ info out there but nothing confirmed on these guys yet.
 

CydeofFries

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 10, 2017
1,444
1,931
113
33
Yeah I get why it is separated on the NCAA by total amount wagered, but I do wonder if average or largest bet should really be the factor for determining how long of a suspension.
 

cyclonez7

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
6,577
1,999
113
Ankeny
These guys definitely shouldn't be gambling, but the amounts reported are totally misleading and each wager probably amounts to no more than a college kids lunch money. They probably didn't even come out making a profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mywayorcyway

cat named georges

Active Member
Apr 16, 2017
48
130
33
Maybe we need to spend more time investigating moms while recruiting players. Who knew so many moms are down with letting their sons gamble illegally?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nrg4isu