The amount of human resources, money, and carbon footprints that go into procuring resources and building such items FAR outweighs the emissions from gasoline vehicles.
In the last 24 hours I've been hearing that we'll probably see the $7,500 rebate lower in 2024. Not sure how much to believe that.Tesla Model Y lease for around $500 per month w/$0 down and short delivery time…very tempting.
Nothing you said was wrong, but it does fall into the category of "why should we do this to solve the problem when we really should focus on that" which ultimately leads to doing nothing at all. Doubly so when doing this means you to make a change, but doing that pushes the changes off onto others. Not that I'm defending McMansions - they're gross, excessive, visually unappealing and horrible for the environment and built environment.Not until they make me.
I'm not against the idea, in theory. I just think it's such a stupid concept that perpetuates so many flaws in logic, common sense, and practicality. First, if we really want to have a (greater) impact on the environment, we should start by limiting the size and footprint of mega-mansions (Bill Gates, Patrick Mahomes, etc), the average household build size (which has increased disproportionately to family size over the years), and limits on unnecessary gas guzzling toys (Jeff Bezos's yacht). The amount of human resources, money, and carbon footprints that go into procuring resources and building such items FAR outweighs the emissions from gasoline vehicles.
The data varies but the average household produces somewhere (in the neighborhood) of 70% more in emissions than the average passenger vehicle. Why are we wasting our time implementing goals for vehicles, without the power grid infrastructure to support it, when we can start by limiting (reasonably....not talking about teepee sized dwellings here) waste elsewhere? I live in JoCo Kansas and routinely drive by a new housing build on Antioch road. This monstrosity is AT LEAST a 3-4 million dollar house, with a huge pond/water fountain, yard, etc. I guaranfuckingtee you there are no more than 4-5 people who will live in that house and that their monthly utility bill will average, at least 3k. Someone needs a house that size like the Israeli's and Palestinians need more hate for each other. Eliminating that kind of waste would have the impact of eliminating dozens of normally aspirated vehicles.
But hey, lets all switch to electric vehicles because "we care about the environment". It's not going to make a pinch of ****'s worth of difference.
Someone's blowing smoke at you, I think. CA, WA, IL and NY all passed laws banning the sale of new ICE vehicles, but not until 2035.I must have missed the federal legislation that was passed that is going to require all of us to purchase an EV vehicle for our next vehicle purchase. Can anyone give me more details about the new law? Good thing I got under the wire last month when I purchased my hybrid grand highlander.
Nothing you said was wrong, but it does fall into the category of "why should we do this to solve the problem when we really should focus on that" which ultimately leads to doing nothing at all. Doubly so when doing this means you to make a change, but doing that pushes the changes off onto others. Not that I'm defending McMansions - they're gross, excessive, visually unappealing and horrible for the environment and built environment.
First, it's far easier to turn over our vehicle stock than repurpose or replace existing buildings. The average age of a vehicle on the road in the US is 12.5 years. The average age of a single family home is 46 years old. We could turn over the majority of vehicles in a decade or so, but buildings would take far, far longer to repurpose or replace. And that's not even factoring in a lot of areas of the country are facing a not insignificant housing shortage.
Second, the type of home you're describing is a far cry from the average home being built. Less that 3% of new homes are over 5,000 square feet. The problem is the average new home is ~2,500 square feet - up from around 1,600 square feet 40 years ago. If we want to tackle the problem, chipping away at the excesses on the edges isn't going to make much of a difference if almost every house is oversized for the number of people living there.
Third, transportation accounts for about double the greenhouse gas emissions of residential emissions, and is far and away the #1 source.
And finally, while it is true electric vehicles need electricity that comes from somewhere, electric cars produce about half the emissions of a traditional car, and electric trucks produce about 40% of that from traditional trucks. We could reduce residential emissions to zero, but having a fully electric transportation network would still have more of an impact in greenhouse gas emissions. Not that either of those are reasonable (or even possible) in the short or even intermediate term.
So, basically, changing the type of vehicles we drive is about the quickest, cheapest and easiest way to have the most impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions while only requiring modest changes in the habits of most people.
Sarcasm is hard for some people, I guess. Those would be state laws not federal, and they do not go into force for another 12 years.Someone's blowing smoke at you, I think. CA, WA, IL and NY all passed laws banning the sale of new ICE vehicles, but not until 2035.
Good timing for my question, lol. Do you use it much for anything other than your commute like small grocery trips or other errands?This summer I purchased a pedal assist e-bike (Aventon Soltera) with the intent of using it 2 or 3 days a week for commuting to work. I live in the Chicago area, and work is in the suburbs meaning public transit isn't quite feasible for commuting. Additionally, my fiancee works remote three days a week, so getting a second car doesn't make a lot of sense when we don't have anywhere to reliably park it. I have found the e-bike to be a great option for my transportation needs.
For my 6.5 mile commute, it takes me 25 minutes to drive into work and 30-40 minutes to drive home depending on traffic. When I do this on my bike, my commute is a consistent 30-35 minutes each way, and I have found a route that is about 1/3 residential/neighborhood streets, 1/3 marked bike lanes, and 1/3 separated bike path.
I managed to go from filling my gas tank roughly once per week, to filling every 3-4 weeks. With gas prices being around $4 in my area for much of the summer, I have saved about 30% of the bike's cost with gas alone, and I've only had it for four months.
I'm not big on other people driving my vehicles.
Unless you go to Jiffy Lube, they drive them anyhow to warm up the oil and do a quick inspection.
This summer I purchased a pedal assist e-bike (Aventon Soltera) with the intent of using it 2 or 3 days a week for commuting to work. I live in the Chicago area, and work is in the suburbs meaning public transit isn't quite feasible for commuting. Additionally, my fiancee works remote three days a week, so getting a second car doesn't make a lot of sense when we don't have anywhere to reliably park it. I have found the e-bike to be a great option for my transportation needs.
For my 6.5 mile commute, it takes me 25 minutes to drive into work and 30-40 minutes to drive home depending on traffic. When I do this on my bike, my commute is a consistent 30-35 minutes each way, and I have found a route that is about 1/3 residential/neighborhood streets, 1/3 marked bike lanes, and 1/3 separated bike path.
I managed to go from filling my gas tank roughly once per week, to filling every 3-4 weeks. With gas prices being around $4 in my area for much of the summer, I have saved about 30% of the bike's cost with gas alone, and I've only had it for four months.
This summer I purchased a pedal assist e-bike (Aventon Soltera) with the intent of using it 2 or 3 days a week for commuting to work. I live in the Chicago area, and work is in the suburbs meaning public transit isn't quite feasible for commuting. Additionally, my fiancee works remote three days a week, so getting a second car doesn't make a lot of sense when we don't have anywhere to reliably park it. I have found the e-bike to be a great option for my transportation needs.
For my 6.5 mile commute, it takes me 25 minutes to drive into work and 30-40 minutes to drive home depending on traffic. When I do this on my bike, my commute is a consistent 30-35 minutes each way, and I have found a route that is about 1/3 residential/neighborhood streets, 1/3 marked bike lanes, and 1/3 separated bike path.
I managed to go from filling my gas tank roughly once per week, to filling every 3-4 weeks. With gas prices being around $4 in my area for much of the summer, I have saved about 30% of the bike's cost with gas alone, and I've only had it for four months.
Good timing for my question, lol. Do you use it much for anything other than your commute like small grocery trips or other errands?
Used market? Did you factor in that your will be buying new batteries?I will wait until there is something affordable in the used market. There are a lot of new models out there right now and a lot of them are going to be lemons, just because it is all new manufacturing processes and new battery manufacturing. In 5-10 years we will know who is getting it right.
Currently my wife has a Prius V that is getting 40 MPG. I wish Toyota would have kept making the V, lots of room. Not a great riding car, but it is very economical. I just bought a 2008 Prius as my beater car. I can't seem to get it over 45 MPG, but the cold windy weather doesn't help.
Used market? Did you factor in that your will be buying new batteries?